| The AFC’s trademark |  |  |  |
| Written by SUNDAR NAUTH |
| Friday, 04 October 2013 23:23 |
I WOULD like to express my shock at the recent revelations by Haseef Yusuf, a member and Councilor of the Alliance For Change (AFC). The most shocking for me, and I guess, for most members of the AFC, and certainly the public, is the fact that the son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC. trademark. |
Replies sorted oldest to newest
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
PPP fail to keep their hands from sucking the blood money out of poor people in Guyana.
PPP fail to keep their hands from sucking the blood money out of poor people in Guyana.
Are you blind not to see that the thread is about the AFC, or you're embarrassed to accept the facts that they too are scum bags from the old block?
PPP fail to keep their hands from sucking the blood money out of poor people in Guyana.
Are you blind not to see that the thread is about the AFC, or you're embarrassed to accept the facts that they too are scum bags from the old block?
from the old block the ppp crime family is old school new school and every day school
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
Is Cathy Hughes above public scrutiny?
Dear Editor,
Perception is everything in politics. Mrs Cathy Hughes being on the payroll of Sithe Global and making decisions in the AFC on Sithe does not seem right. I as an ordinary person have forgiven Mr Nigel Hughes since he did the honourable thing and resigned from one of the entities he has been involved in, and even issued a public apology.
However, none of this was forthcoming from Mrs Cathy Hughes and it has been a month now. Is she above public scrutiny?
Yours faithfully,
(Name and address provided)
Is Cathy Hughes above public scrutiny?
Dear Editor,
Perception is everything in politics. Mrs Cathy Hughes being on the payroll of Sithe Global and making decisions in the AFC on Sithe does not seem right. I as an ordinary person have forgiven Mr Nigel Hughes since he did the honourable thing and resigned from one of the entities he has been involved in, and even issued a public apology.
However, none of this was forthcoming from Mrs Cathy Hughes and it has been a month now. Is she above public scrutiny?
Yours faithfully,
(Name and address provided)
How come Dr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited statements?
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
A thief is a thief, there is no unreal thief. If Ashni is a real thief, he should be locked up. Why is he still the finance minister?
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
A thief is a thief, there is no unreal thief. If Ashni is a real thief, he should be locked up. Why is he still the finance minister?
Because they rigged the system.
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
A thief is a thief, there is no unreal thief. If Ashni is a real thief, he should be locked up. Why is he still the finance minister?
Cobra,
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. All the AFC had was snake oil and the snake oil bottle was smashed as the AFC imploded. RIP AFC.
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
A thief is a thief, there is no unreal thief. If Ashni is a real thief, he should be locked up. Why is he still the finance minister?
Cobra,
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. All the AFC had was snake oil and the snake oil bottle was smashed as the AFC imploded. RIP AFC.
The courts of America made it clear that the PPP is a narco government. They are a criminal enterprise.
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. What the US courts said about the PPP government would not hold up either. So, why cry over spilled milk? Are we going to lose time and energy over something that will not materialize?
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. What the US courts said about the PPP government would not hold up either. So, why cry over spilled milk? Are we going to lose time and energy over something that will not materialize?
RIP AFC.
The party of the dead AFC. The snake oil that they tried to sell is rotten and it stinks as much as the AFC which is corrupt at its very core. The stench of AFC corruption was so bad that their executive members had to flee in droves.
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. What the US courts said about the PPP government would not hold up either. So, why cry over spilled milk? Are we going to lose time and energy over something that will not materialize?
RIP AFC.
The party of the dead AFC. The snake oil that they tried to sell is rotten and it stinks as much as the AFC which is corrupt at its very core. The stench of AFC corruption was so bad that their executive members had to flee in droves.
The joint opposition spent taxpayer's money on motions, inquires and investigation to pass judgement on the PPP government that comes up empty every time. They still continue on the same witch hunting path.
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. What the US courts said about the PPP government would not hold up either. So, why cry over spilled milk? Are we going to lose time and energy over something that will not materialize?
RIP AFC.
The party of the dead AFC. The snake oil that they tried to sell is rotten and it stinks as much as the AFC which is corrupt at its very core. The stench of AFC corruption was so bad that their executive members had to flee in droves.
The joint opposition spent taxpayer's money on motions, inquires and investigation to pass judgement on the PPP government that comes up empty every time. They still continue on the same witch hunting path.
I clearly remember when a televised debate on corruption was aired and Gerhard showed up and could not prove anything. He walked away with his tail between his legs. To date the AFC has proven ZERO. Their party is now ZERO. Karma bit them in the rear.
The PNC can holler all they want but they will forever remain a forty percent party. The PPP will rule Guyana for another 100 years, majority or minority.
The AFC is now rotting in the political graveyard with ROAR.
To date, the AFC has not been able to prove their claims in a court of law. What the US courts said about the PPP government would not hold up either. So, why cry over spilled milk? Are we going to lose time and energy over something that will not materialize?
RIP AFC.
The party of the dead AFC. The snake oil that they tried to sell is rotten and it stinks as much as the AFC which is corrupt at its very core. The stench of AFC corruption was so bad that their executive members had to flee in droves.
The joint opposition spent taxpayer's money on motions, inquires and investigation to pass judgement on the PPP government that comes up empty every time. They still continue on the same witch hunting path.
I clearly remember when a televised debate on corruption was aired and Gerhard showed up and could not prove anything. He walked away with his tail between his legs. To date the AFC has proven ZERO. Their party is now ZERO. Karma bit them in the rear.
The PNC can holler all they want but they will forever remain a forty percent party. The PPP will rule Guyana for another 100 years, majority or minority.
The AFC is now rotting in the political graveyard with ROAR.
The American court already proved the corruption. Roger Khan proved the corruption by saying he worked for the PPP. Brassington proved the corruption by selling the insurance to his brother. Ed Ahmad proved the corruption by sending 19 tons of goods to Jagdeo. Irfan Ally made a house for 200 mill after being a minister for 3 years.
Yuji does not respond to JB. He is a qualified dunce.
JB is:
Is Cathy Hughes above public scrutiny?
Dear Editor,
Perception is everything in politics. Mrs Cathy Hughes being on the payroll of Sithe Global and making decisions in the AFC on Sithe does not seem right. I as an ordinary person have forgiven Mr Nigel Hughes since he did the honourable thing and resigned from one of the entities he has been involved in, and even issued a public apology.
However, none of this was forthcoming from Mrs Cathy Hughes and it has been a month now. Is she above public scrutiny?
Yours faithfully,
(Name and address provided)
Cathy is in charge of the corrupt and unethical AFC. The AFC is now All For Corruption.
Yuji does not respond to JB. He is a qualified dunce.
JB is:
Haha. You are a sour loser. 
At least the Stabroek News dishes out criticisms fairly. Look how they put it on Mr Nigel. Can you say the same for the PPP papers like Guyana Times?
Conflict of Interest has become a trademark of the AFC
Thank God APNU saved the nation from that thieving project Amaila.
Read the Q&A with David Granger's "Hot Seat" interview where he failed to be an opposition leader of the people and development of Guyana.
1) The son-in-law of David Granger, Dominic Gaskin, is the treasurer of the AFC.
2)Kathy Hughes fail to disclose her conflict of interest position with the Amaila Falls Hydro Project.
3)Nigel Hughes deliberately fail to disclose his client/lawyer relationship with the foreman of the jury that acquitted the Lusignan massacre.
4)Nagamootoo fail to disclose that NICIL was a client of his.
5) Ramjattan, leader of the AFC fail to disclose that Fedders Lloyd was his client.
You must add to that list the fact that Mr Ashni Singh's wife signs the audited accounts for her husband. Is that right?
This is an AFC debate. Why we must divert attention?
Because you fail to see the real thieves.
TK you among the real thieves right now and you know it to be a fact but you are in it for your own gain.
Access to this requires a premium membership.