The Alliance needs CHANGE

Topics

Former Member

Singh's letter underscores fact that 'Alliance' needs 'Change'

Written by BALDEO MATHURA

Thursday, 22 September 2011 01:46

THE AFC's Sasenarine Singh is up to mischief again. Kaieteur News and Singh fooled no one as the erroneous contents of Singh's letter was deliberate and so too was its publication in the unedited form.
They both are anti-government and also both employ sensationalism and misinformation as a means of discrediting the government. So when Singh's letter titled "All hail the boy Emperor" found its way in the September 19 edition of the Kaieteur News, I was not surprised.
What surprised me though was the claim by this newspaper that it has noticed over a period of time that letters by Singh are usually riddled with statements not fit for publication.

It also said that some of the statements contained in Singh's latest letter were libellous, unsubstantiated and smacked of rank politicking designed to discredit the government.

This is quite an indictment from an opposition aligned newspaper on an official of the opposition party which projects itself as being an agent of 'change'. It now leaves one to wonder what 'change' might take place should these folks be given a chance to govern.

It is this type of behaviour by Singh which exposes the 'bottom house' mentality of the clique which now dominates the AFC hierarchy.
And it truly underscores the fact that the 'Alliance' needs 'Change'

Replies sorted oldest to newest

MitwahSenior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:

FOR CONTINUED SQUANDERMANIA AND SUPER SALARIES
- GAIL TEXEIRA G$880,000/MONTH OR 10M/YEAR &
ODINGA LUMUMBA G$660,000/MONTH OR 8M/YEAR WHILE
POLICE RECEIVE G$45,000/MONTH OR US$225/MONTH

THE AFC WILL CUT THESE SALARIES, ELIMINATE
SOME OF THESE POSITIONS AND INCREASE
THE SALARIES OF POLICE BY 20%

9/22/118:48 AM

Former Member

quote:
Originally posted by Cobra:
The preacher doesn't practice what he preaches, and it comes back to bite his ass. So said the Dutchman, gooby.

9/22/118:48 AM

MitwahSenior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Mitwah:
quote:
Originally posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:

FOR CONTINUED SQUANDERMANIA AND SUPER SALARIES
- GAIL TEXEIRA G$880,000/MONTH OR 10M/YEAR &
ODINGA LUMUMBA G$660,000/MONTH OR 8M/YEAR WHILE
POLICE RECEIVE G$45,000/MONTH OR US$225/MONTH

THE AFC WILL CUT THESE SALARIES, ELIMINATE
SOME OF THESE POSITIONS AND INCREASE
THE SALARIES OF POLICE BY 20%

.

9/22/119:09 AM

Former Member

The "Alliance for Change" is using the word CHANGE very bluntly without understanding the nature of the word, whether it means four cents, ten cents or just pocket change. If they're running low on change, they can always come to the PPP for big-money wine.

9/22/119:11 AM

MitwahSenior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Cobra:
The "Alliance for Change" is using the word CHANGE very bluntly without understanding the nature of the word, whether it means four cents, ten cents or just pocket change. If they're running low on change, they can always come to the PPP for big-money wine.

Your comprehension is one of your many challenges.

9/22/119:13 AM

Former Member

quote:
Originally posted by Mitwah:
quote:
Originally posted by Cobra:
The "Alliance for Change" is using the word CHANGE very bluntly without understanding the nature of the word, whether it means four cents, ten cents or just pocket change. If they're running low on change, they can always come to the PPP for big-money wine.

Your comprehension is one of your many challenges.

My comment is not based on the related article. It's just a general remark on how the word change is used by your party executives.

9/22/119:18 AM

MitwahSenior Member

quote:
Originally posted by Cobra:
quote:
Originally posted by Mitwah:
quote:
Originally posted by Cobra:
The "Alliance for Change" is using the word CHANGE very bluntly without understanding the nature of the word, whether it means four cents, ten cents or just pocket change. If they're running low on change, they can always come to the PPP for big-money wine.

Your comprehension is one of your many challenges.

My comment is not based on the related article. It's just a general remark on how the word change is used by your party executives.

Makes no difference. Comprehend?

9/22/119:49 AM