Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

THE CIVIC WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE A FORMAL GROUPING

 
August 2, 2012 | By | Filed Under Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom -- Source
 
There was a false expectation that the PPP would not have gone on to the last elections with the Civic component attached. It was expected that the Civic would have been subsumed by the party. This was a false premise and was based on the notion that after close to twenty years in power, the PPP would have been able to bring over the Civic personalities into the party, thus creating a party of balanced political interests.

This was, however, never the idea behind the Civic. The Civic component of the PPP/C was conceived to create a balance within the government, and not the party.

Dr. Cheddi Jagan had the foresight to understand that his party’s roots, its history and ideological affinity would not have allowed it to have easily become a party representing the totality of interests, classes and ethnicities within the country. The Civic was created to ensure that balance within the government.

The Civic was never intended to be a formal grouping in an alliance with the PPP. It emerged following the breakdown of the talks within the Patriotic Coalition for Democracy (PCD) to have a joint slate. The main villains in that process were the Working People’s Alliance (WPA) and the Guyanese Action for Reform and Democracy (GUARD), a civil-society movement.

Within the PCD there was great opposition to Dr. Jagan becoming the presidential candidate for the 1992 elections. It was said that he was old and would not attract the support of African-Guyanese.

When he offered to have Dr. Roger Luncheon as the presidential candidate, the criticism was that while the doctor was Black he was a communist.

In the end there was an agreement for a presidential slate comprising Dr. Jagan as President, Clive Thomas as Prime Minister and Paul Tennessee as Deputy Prime Minister. However, the WPA and GUARD weaved their mischief and eventually scuttled the process.

This then led the PPP to come up with the idea of the Civic which would comprise of individuals from the professions, academia, religion and business, that would add balance to any government involving the PPP, since the PPP did not enjoy such balance.

Cheddi did not see the PPP as transforming itself into anything other than a working class party. He therefore could not envisage the PPP becoming a party of all classes and interests.

If the PPP had undergone such a transformation, it would have bettered the record of the old socialist, Desmond Hoyte, suddenly experiencing an epiphany and overnight becoming a champion of the free market.

The PPP did not have to change to become a party of all interests. Following the departure of Mrs. Janet Jagan as President, the party was hijacked by the bourgeoisie class.

The challenge of Donald Ramotar is how to return the party to the working class roots, to becoming once again the party of Cheddi Jagan. That process is not going to be easy and it is not going to be swift.

President Ramotar will continue to face fierce criticism about not going far enough, not moving fast enough and not distancing himself from his predecessor.

These same criticisms were leveled against Desmond Hoyte when he became President. Many were upset when he retained most of the old Burnham guard after the death of the founder-leader of the PNC. Hoyte in time consolidated himself in his party and government and was able to eventually banish most of the old guard into political obscurity.

The same charge of not distancing himself from the old guard was also leveled at the feet of Bharrat Jagdeo. He too eventually was able to place a wedge between himself and the party. He eventually consolidated his power to the extent that he could have referred to the views of one of the leading lights of party as the opinion of a β€œprivate citizen.”

It will take Donald Ramotar some time, but eventually he too will have his way within the PPP. State power which now resides in his hands is much too powerful to prevent that from eventually happening.

The PPP will therefore return to its working class roots. Already Ramotar is maneuvering party loyalists closer to the government.

He knows what he is doing. It is the party, through its stalwarts, that is taking command of the negotiations with the opposition. It is only a matter of time, perhaps within six months, before Donald Ramotar wrests control of the party from those whose interests it has served and return it to its working class roots.

What is however not going to change is the nature of the Civic. There is not going to any grouping known as the Civic. The Civic as conceived is supposed to about individuals serving within the government. Civic is about individuals who the PPP has been able to attract and who can add gender, ethnic and class balance to the government, and not to the party. So if you are a Civic and are not in the government you are out like south.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

The above represents the absolute  lack of intellectual input in our political discourse and the  morons who are the appointed communicators for our social and political needs. This is about arguing the definition of the sphere and the ball and inevitably self defeating.  

 

It matters not what the constituent elements of the appendage the PPP attaches to itself;  it is still the same race based ideologically calcified party. Further quibbling about returning to a working class roots is no less wishful thinking as those religious freaks with revivalist agendas peering into the past for a golden era to recapture lost vitality.

 

Unfortunately none ever exists there that serves the modern needs in a rapidly changing environment.Were this blind bat concerned with vitality and relevance in our system or the PPP he would look to the needs of the people for accountability and balance and begin there. We do not need sainted elders or wise gurus.

 

We need a CEO  who know he is time limited and we can fire his ass if he fails. We do not need autocrats or oligarchs or Marcos or Suharto’s. The PPP in any of its reformulations as a democratic centralist concretized view would remain ideologically bound and visionless.

FM
Originally Posted by Prashad:

It is a bloody sin when Joey Jagan a man whose parents and godfather founded the PPP party and whose parents built the party is not allowed to join that party. 

-----------

 

The PPP is a conduit through which to get to the resources of the nation for the benefit of families and friends. Joey seemed to have been locked out of the wealth conduit.

FM
Originally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:

You used the word 'hate' I don't think that 95 per cent per cent of Lindeners hate the PPP even though they may have voted for another party.


You know you are quite a silly man.  Why will 95% o0f the blacks from the tip of the NorthWest District to the Rupununi, not only that group but those of mixed ancestry all vote against the PPP?  Divided as they are by social class, ideology, geography, and ethnic affiliation.

 

Isnt it odd that they all just happen to vote against the PPP without there being a possibility that they think that the PPP just doesnt respoect them as people of African and mixed ancestry?  What a feat that will be for folks so different from each other to all agree on one thing!

FM
Originally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:

You are confusing. And you are using assumptions created by you to sound as facts.

The reason you are so different from him is because he represents what you are not...the views of black people who are his kith and kin and cultural siblings.

 

The PPP has never garnered more than 5 percent of the black votes nor has the PNC been able to gain as much Indians either. No one makes that up. That is the reality.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×