The constitution is subject to interpretation but the government Attorney General, in this case, would not interpret it against its own party, or, this I was made to believe. The Court of Appeal decision sways on racial lines, but to understand the real interpretation lies with the CCJ. I say this because the case to challenge the 33/34 of the no-confidence vote was also decided on racial lines but was overturned by the CCJ.
I am sure all legal experts used the law of the constitution appropriately, but I have seen different interpretations of different matters at different times from the same constitution. If the CCJ is where the buck stops, then we have no choice but to respect its final decision on the 2020 elections.