Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

The intention behind the Government’s negligence

Public Security Minister Khemraj Ramjattan remained almost invisible and quiet since the coalition Government took Office. So quiet that one is led to wonder if he’s being deliberately silenced. His few attempts to address the drastic soar in crime observed over the past three months, appear to be a source of mockery and anger for the public, probably causing him to return to hide in his cocoon away from public criticism.

Could it be that the Securities Minister is being dictated a code of conduct and a restricted agenda by others in Government, or is he simply incapable of handling the savagery which currently defines the actions of criminals?

While no one seems to be safe from the crime spree, not even 77 year old grandmothers or immigrants, the measures initiated by the Public Security Minister are a firsthand reflection of his inaptitude in understanding the challenges of and producing the solutions to the issue and nature of crimes in Guyana. It also questions the intention of the PNC-led Government, considering its apparent indifference to the escalation of crime.

Although female officers on horseback parading in Bel Air Park might be an interesting attraction, it most certainly doesn’t impact the reduction of crime. Nor is trying to convince Guyana that all Guyanese will be safe if they stop drinking at 2 am. Here Minister Ramjattan actually incurs the risk of developing underground activities to compensate for the reduction of business income, (probably boosting the “bush rum” industry!), subsequently increasing vulnerability of Guyanese.

Now, Minister Ramjattan has decided to take up the fight against suicide, which, although it is a major socioeconomic issue in our society, doesn’t represent an immediate threat to random Guyanese going about their daily businesses. This is an initiative which could be prioritized simultaneously with policies aimed at reducing crime. Yet, it doesn’t seem to retain the Minister’s attention as one needing immediate action, even though the crimes committed are sometimes tinged with hues of this country’s ethnic divide.

While the majority of victims remain Guyanese, immigrants, particularly from the Brazilian and Chinese communities, who contribute heavily to what was a vibrant South American economy up to a few months ago, are also targeted. The brutal massacre of a Chinese national who owned a restaurant on Mandela Avenue is proof that no one is exempt from being targeted. The Government’s laid-back attitude could be interpreted by both the criminals and the wider society as a calculated negligence regarding the exposure of hard working Guyanese, including those of the business community, to crime.

Also, the discriminatory behavior of public authorities regardless of the country’s cultural diversity or constant flux of foreigners, is overtly visible. For instance, there’s the case of a Canadian woman being assaulted by guards at a popular Regent Road mall. Even more recent is the case of eight Indian nationals who were left on the Tarmac of the CJIA after an Insel Air aircraft refused to transport the men who were initially refused permission to stay in Guyana for different reasons. They were treated no better than criminals, as they were left on the CJIA tarmac until it was decided what the next step would be in dealing with their case.

However, Guyanese who are known to have migrated in countries across the world also face strict, sometimes discriminatory immigration policies, especially in the U.S. In this regard, the Government, and in particular Citizenship Minister Felix, should promote nondiscriminatory policies, especially for immigrants who come to Guyana to invest, and must also ensure that Guyana is perceived as a non-hostile country on the international scene. After all, what message are we sending to our neighbours and the world if our own Government, overseeing a culturally diverse country, cannot treat immigrants with respect?

But what is the point of even investing in a decent immigration policies when the Public Securities Ministry is failing at its principal mandate, that of creating a friendly, hospitable and secure society? For although this country needs the human and financial capital offered by immigrants, our Government is failing to create the environment in which they could safely thrive. The negative consequences will befall both Guyanese and investors.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Quote "Public Security Minister Khemraj Ramjattan remained almost invisible and quiet since the coalition Government took Office. So quiet that one is led to wonder if he’s being deliberately silenced. His few attempts to address the drastic soar in crime observed over the past three months, appear to be a source of mockery and anger for the public, probably causing him to return to hide in his cocoon away from public criticism.unquote

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Rising Crime

From the reports that cross our news desk and enter the pages of our newspaper, there is no doubt that there has been a steady escalation of violent crimes in our nation. There has thankfully been a reduction in attacks against women by their male partners but unfortunately that has been replaced in exponential fashion by an upsurge in robberies under arms accompanied by callous killings of the victims.

These used to be most prevalent in Georgetown but in the last year the phenomenon has spread all across the country. The most egregious recent examples have been the killing of the MultiPlex Mall owner Ganesh Ramlall on the West Coast of Demerara and the murder of the 77 year old pensioner Carmen Ganesh. Execution-style murders that have now become all too common in the country and the matter of fact accounts in this area by Sean Hinds, even if exaggerated, should give all Guyanese pause.

Entering our country as part of the drug trafficking culture, one fears that the grisly innovation may have percolated into the repertoire of those just desirous of settling “scores”. It is suspected that the murder of the Montrose pensioner could have been a paid “hit”. Guns and gunmen are now evidently readily available for hire. This recourse is simply an extension of the increasing proclivity of our people to escalate their difference of opinions from the verbal into the physical.

It is not surprising that there have been increased calls from several sections of the public for the National Security Minister and the police to increase their vigilance and their anti-crime activities to quell this upsurge of violence. Governments, after all, have been instituted by the people to deal with just this sort of contingency, among others. However, we would like to suggest that the irruption of violence across such a wide spectrum of strata and constituencies should give some pause to a focus solely on a law and order response to the problem.

Stable and successful societies remain as such not at the point of a gun or at the threat of incarceration. Citizens follow the rules, norms and laws of their society and country that were evolved for maintaining stability because they have been socialised to do so. What has been happening in our society is there has been an increased effort from a disgruntled section to undermine and corrode that socialisation process by trashing our rules and norms and suggesting violent responses to inevitable individual frustrations.

For almost two decades there has been one pretext or another to stir up tension and hatred that breaks out into violence. Who can forget the East Coast violence circa 2001-2008 that came out of a political strategy of “slow fyaah, mo fyaah”? Once the genie is let out of the bottle it is almost impossible to get it back in.

Such provoked anger and accompanying violence cannot be confined hermetically into “political” action alone. They percolate by osmosis into interpersonal relations among the general populace (spousal and family violence) and more directly into criminal activity. Even a cursory review of our history will reveal the stark correlation of heightened violence in our society with inflammatory rhetoric from opportunistic disgruntled political activists.

What we are proposing therefore, is that in addition to increased law and order preparedness – such as the recent introduction of a SWAT team – is that right-thinking members of our society have to reject the path to chaos proposed by the rabble rousers in our midst. They have to insist that violence and a flouting of our norms and rules – not to mention laws will not be tolerated.

We have seen the gradual degradation of the moral fibre of our nation since the introduction of political violence in the sixties. Not only has it threatened our survival as a state and nation but inevitably as individual persons.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Since Grainger kept his high level security meeting, crimes get worse. Perhaps, his message enlighten the criminals more.

You admitted  to your disciples robbing people from the airport and returning  them home  in body bags.

Crime in Guyana got worse after the PPP lost the election. Only  a lame brain would know its not related.

Jagdeo and your disciples  at the airport are known for their nastiness and vindictiveness, even to the people who voted for them.    

  

Tola

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×