Skip to main content

Editorials, Op-Ed and Letters | OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

The Muslims of Early America

Andrea Mongia

IT was not the imam’s first time at the rodeo.

Scheduled to deliver an invocation at the Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo last week, Moujahed Bakhach of the local Islamic Association of Tarrant County canceled his appearance because of the backlash brought on by a prayer he had offered a few days before. The imam had been asked to confer a blessing on horses, riders and members of the military. He was met with gasps from the audience and social media complaints: “Outraged at a Muslim prayer at an all American event!” “Cowboys don’t want it!”

 

Vocal anti-Islamic sentiment is undergoing a revival. Four days before the imam’s canceled benediction, protesters at the State Capitol in Austin shouted down Muslim speakers, claiming Texas in the name of Jesus alone. In North Carolina two weeks earlier, Duke University’s plan to broadcast a Muslim call to prayer was abandoned amid threats of violence. Meanwhile Gov. Bobby Jindal, Republican of Louisiana claimed that if American Muslims “want to set up their own culture and values, that’s not immigration, that’s really invasion.”

 

No matter how anxious people may be about Islam, the notion of a Muslim invasion of this majority Christian country has no basis in fact. Moreover, there is an inconvenient footnote to the assertion that Islam is anti-American: Muslims arrived here before the founding of the United States — not just a few, but thousands.

 

They have been largely overlooked because they were not free to practice their faith. They were not free themselves and so they were for the most part unable to leave records of their beliefs. They left just enough to confirm that Islam in America is not an immigrant religion lately making itself known, but a tradition with deep roots here, despite being among the most suppressed in the nation’s history.

 

In 1528, a Moroccan slave called Estevanico was shipwrecked along with a band of Spanish explorers near the future city of Galveston, Tex. The city of Azemmour, in which he was raised, had been a Muslim stronghold against European invasion until it fell during his youth. While given a Christian name after his enslavement, he eventually escaped his Christian captors and set off on his own through much of the Southwest.

 

Two hundred years later, plantation owners in Louisiana made it a point to add enslaved Muslims to their labor force, relying on their experience with the cultivation of indigo and rice. Scholars have noted Muslim names and Islamic religious titles in the colony’s slave inventories and death records.

The best known Muslim to pass through the port at New Orleans was Abdul-Rahman Ibrahim ibn Sori, a prince in his homeland whose plight drew wide attention. As one newspaper account noted, he had read the Bible and admired its precepts, but added, “His principal objections are that Christians do not follow them.”

 

Among the enslaved Muslims in North Carolina was a religious teacher named Omar ibn Said. Recaptured in 1810 after running away from a cruel master he called a kafir (an infidel), he became known for inscribing the walls of his jail cell with Arabic script. He wrote an account of his life in 1831, describing how in freedom he had loved to read the Quran, but in slavery his owners had converted him to Christianity.

 

The story of Islam in early America is not merely one of isolated individuals. An estimated 20 percent of enslaved Africans were Muslims, and many sought to recreate the communities they had known. In Georgia, which has joined more than a dozen states in the political theater of debating a restriction on judges’ consulting Shariah, Muslims on a secluded plantation are known to have lived under the guidance of a religious leader who wrote a manuscript on Islamic law so that traditional knowledge might survive.

 

A clue to what happened to these forgotten American Muslims can be found in the words of a missionary traveling through the South to preach the gospel on slave plantations. Many “Mohammedan Africans,” he noted, had found ways to “accommodate” Islam to the new beliefs imposed upon them. “God, say they, is Allah, and Jesus Christ is Mohammed. The religion is the same, but different countries have different names.”

 

The missionary considered this to be lamentable evidence of Muslims’ inability to recognize the importance of religious truths. But in fact it proves just the opposite. They understood that their faith was important enough that they should listen for it everywhere, even in a country so distant from the places where they had once heard the call to prayer.

 

Islam is part of our common history — a resilient faith not just of the enslaved, but of Arab immigrants in the late 19th century, and in the 20th century of many African-Americans reclaiming and remaking it as their own. For generations, its adherents have straddled a nation that jolts from promises of religious freedom to events that give the lie to those promises.

In a sense, Islam is as American as the rodeo. It, too, was imported, but is now undeniably part of the culture. Whether or not protesters in Texas and elsewhere are ready for it, it is inevitable that some Muslims will let their babies grow up to be cowboys. A few cowboys may grow up to be Muslims as well.

 

Peter Manseau is the author, most recently, of “One Nation Under Gods: A New American History.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This is really a stretch to serve an obvious political goal.

 

The fact is that Islam has not been historically part of the American story. That there have been individual Muslims on American soil is of little consequence because they did not contribute to the development of the United States' history until recent times with immigration.

 

This is just more liberal nonsense because our liberal elites feel the American public need a lesson in tolerance so they invent nonsense.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

This is just more liberal nonsense because our liberal elites feel the American public need a lesson in tolerance so they invent nonsense.

Shaits, I  see you're part of the Fox News demographic.....

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

This is just more liberal nonsense because our liberal elites feel the American public need a lesson in tolerance so they invent nonsense.

Shaits, I  see you're part of the Fox News demographic.....

 

I hate to disappoint you but I am not.

 

FYI, I support many many laudable liberal principles and policies. I don't think all liberalism is bad, I'm just a la carte about my politics. I don't do dogma. Also, I like liberals best when they stick to government policy. They tend to lose me when they want us tolerate nonsense such as burqa wearing and "feelings" as a basis for social policy.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

This is really a stretch to serve an obvious political goal.

 

Pot calling kettle black, eh!

 

As a pot, I can spot a kettle a mile away chap

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

This is just more liberal nonsense because our liberal elites feel the American public need a lesson in tolerance so they invent nonsense.

Shaits, I  see you're part of the Fox News demographic.....

 

I hate to disappoint you but I am not.

 

FYI, I support many many laudable liberal principles and policies. I don't think all liberalism is bad, I'm just a la carte about my politics. I don't do dogma. Also, I like liberals best when they stick to government policy. They tend to lose me when they want us tolerate nonsense such as burqa wearing and "feelings" as a basis for social policy.

I'm just a la carte about my politics - seems counter-intuitive to the notion of a "principled" actor.

 

I don't do dogma - this is laudable and at odds with that dogma "à la carte" anything.

 

Kari

Some years ago, a Bajan chap stated that Islam is their religion-it is an African religion. He insisted, that Islam has been in Africa long before Christianity. I inquired of him whether he knew that Ethiopia had Christianity since the first century. As well as South India. He din believe me. Even though the Ethiopian Orthodox Church still exist unbroken since that time. Bilal was an African slave to Mohammad, yet he felt obligated to worship as his master did. A Muslim Guyanese tried to justify this type of slavery as not the type of the White-man. Muslims caught and sold African slaves to the white people, but yet there was no evil in the acts of the muslim traders. 

 

I think people get wrapped up in this idea that Islam must be recognized. It is somewhat like a competition. If those people are looking for God, then they should know He is not in a Temple(Mandir), Synagogue, Church or a Mosque. And all the text about Him were written by men who He deemed as sinners. For the person who desperately seeks the heart of God-those men have said God is infinite. 

 

I know atheist doan believe in all that stuff, but yet, they have found the knowledge to simply dismiss God.

 

God is the sort of person that can be approached anytime anywhere.    

 

S
Originally Posted by seignet:

I know atheist doan believe in all that stuff, but yet, they have found the knowledge to simply dismiss God.

 

God is the sort of person that can be approached anytime anywhere.    

 

atheist.....they have found the knowledge to simply dismiss God -

Image result for scratching head

 

God is the sort of person that can be approached anytime anywhere - now this isa thoughtful thing to say.

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

This is just more liberal nonsense because our liberal elites feel the American public need a lesson in tolerance so they invent nonsense.

Shaits, I  see you're part of the Fox News demographic.....

 

I hate to disappoint you but I am not.

 

FYI, I support many many laudable liberal principles and policies. I don't think all liberalism is bad, I'm just a la carte about my politics. I don't do dogma. Also, I like liberals best when they stick to government policy. They tend to lose me when they want us tolerate nonsense such as burqa wearing and "feelings" as a basis for social policy.

I'm just a la carte about my politics - seems counter-intuitive to the notion of a "principled" actor.

 

I don't do dogma - this is laudable and at odds with that dogma "à la carte" anything.

 

 

My Brother in Darwinian Evolution,

 

You do me great injury by suggesting my "a la carte" reference to politics is borne of a lack of principles. I have many principles. I just happen to be a hybrid of classical liberal, social democrat, liberal, statist, etc. etc.

 

I just happen to believe we should be "a la carte" in so far as we should be practical in adopting solutions to real problems. For example, I am a total backer of single payer socialized medicine. I'm also vigorously in favor of American power as an anchor of the international system. For different problems, different theoretical approaches work better. Among my many guiding principles would be (and not to sound too corny) "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Can't be happy if you don't have good healthcare. Can't be alive if you aren't strong on defense. Can't be at liberty if you can get killed for drawing the wrong cartoons.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by seignet:

I know atheist doan believe in all that stuff, but yet, they have found the knowledge to simply dismiss God.

 

God is the sort of person that can be approached anytime anywhere.    

 

atheist.....they have found the knowledge to simply dismiss God -

Image result for scratching head

 

God is the sort of person that can be approached anytime anywhere - now this isa thoughtful thing to say.

 

Really chap?

 

I've talked to God almost daily for decades. As a devout Muslim child and then as a devout Catholic teen and young adult.

 

While I understood that he should rightly be too busy with managing world and universe affairs to get around to granting me a private audience, I also saw no evidence of his handiwork in the starving kids of Africa, the tsunami, and the numerous other natural and unnatural disasters that are daily visited upon mankind.

 

So I just arrived at the Occam's Razor solution....I was just talking to myself all these years.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×