Multi-million$$ taxi bill probe opens can of worms… Car owners dispute figures, fear visit from the taxman

These tiefs cannot help themselves, they addicted to living off the sweat of the poor people of Guyana.

The question remains, why did the AFC/PNC contingent run away from the corruption debates? That's because they are impotent when it comes to proving these allegations of corruption. You fools now resort to making claims that you can't back up on this forum, but then when confronted by those you accuse on national tv, you idiots run away.

You are such a jackass. Why don't you speak on the topic at hand?

Debating corruption on TV is unheard of.   Only the GOG and backward PPP would propose such an event.  Corruption has to be investigated in Parliament and/or through an independent commission with specific terms of engagement.  TV has no mandate to govern or opine on any discussion on the subject.  You see the PPP want to create a distraction from the real issues by having a brawl on TV. It was a mistake to agree to participate in such an event.

FOOLS LIKE YOU ARE UNHEARD OF BEFORE YOUR BIRTH. NOW THE WORLD IS CONTAMINATED WITH RAW SEWAGE!!!

That response speaks to the level of intelligence of the PPP and their supporters on this forum. 

FOOL, CORRUPTION IS BEING DEBATED ON TELEVISION ALL OVER THE WORLD BUT YOU ARE TOO BLIND AND DUMB TO KNOW THAT!!!

I will forgive you for your intelligence deficiency.  You are confusing reporting of corruption on TV and/or the investigation of corruption by say congress by TV. Glad to clear this up for you.  Come again bird brain.

No I am not. You just need to come out of the hole you in from time to time.

take a hike you piddling man. Corruption for the most part is defined as a deficit of democracy. It is the circumstances that permit crooks at heart to fleece the system with no accountability. It is not alleviated by debates on tv and  it is not address  by pretending that the party in power knows best. Men are as Madison said, "not angels" and that is the reason we need government.

And we do not merely need government but one in which are embedded systemic structures to restrain the excesses of government. The PPP are the epitome of excessive government. They are autocrats who believe they alone knows best and they can only function if they have unlimited authority to do as they please. It is the reason they are in court all the time and insist parliament, the legislative body in our nation has no authority to constrain their unbridled authority to do as they please.

One does not debate that. One debates the lack of controls which they resist tooth and nail to institute. They are in office 20 years and govern no less than burnham and thief far more. That is self evident since we have not any obscenely member of the burnhamite cabinet existing but practically every one of these crooks in the PPP flash obscene cash in the way they live.  Jagdeo was there only a decade and he owns more than all of Burnham people combined. He even employ some of them!

Corruption debates can be done in parliament and within the frame work of the media. What's done in parliament is public business and there are transcripts of parliamentary business for the record. What is debated in the media is to give the Guyanese populace a chance to judge for themselves.

Another PPP simpleton.  Using the state controlled media to put out your own spin is not a debate nor is it a forum for investigating corruption.

you ppp lowlife thief trying to hide your shame

Warria: How do you determine that a person is a lowlife? A difference of political beliefs does not make one a low life.

Calling people negroes, use of the "N" word to refer to blacks.

Another day, another PPP scam.

No doubt that you are the champion of verbosity, however your writings lack substance. How is it possible to write 3 paragraphs without actually saying anything of substance and still not answering the question I posed? Why did the AFC/PNC run away from the corruption debates on public TV , giving up a golden opportunity to prove what they have been claiming for years now? The reason is that you people have no substance to back up your claims. when faced with rebuttal from the PPP you take your ball and go home like immature school yard kids. 

 Saying it lacks substance does not cut it.  Each of the paragraphs carried a theme; 1) men are crooked and need accountable government constrained by checks and balances, 2)the PPP are crooked can function only in an autocracy; 3) and excusing crookedness and need for an autocracy on the backs of the PNC is a waste of an excuse. The most surprising thing that you can do is actually rebut an argument. You are too shallow a twit to be of service there.

Each of your paragraphs were ramblings devoid of fact. When you can concretely prove these allegation then maybe you will regain some of the stature you once held despite your buffoonish behavior at times. 

It is truly hard to resist the conclusion you are indeed an intellectual cripple.  In democratic assessment one does not  have to prove anything one simply have to illustrate the absence of essential features that makes democracy work.

I give you a working definition of corruption, ie democratic deficits such as autocratic behavior of a government and resistance to checks and balances. Where these exist it follows the absence is because of corruption.It cannot exist unless the people there are thieves.

One need not even speak to the the glaring pathology of this corruption as in the rise of an ostentatious a patrician class of the obscenely rich in the PPP. Obviously, it is magical thinking to believe they got that way on their salaries. Yes you are a moron and only given to stupid vacuous utterances these days.

WHATTACK and another blow to the head of Gurdle the drugman and down he goes, out cold hopefully so he stays silent. What a stupid man.

Rentokil hunting down Walla & Friends

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rpu0ebHd1hk

Iman hear walla an dem boys so tough, they does use that thing as deodorant.

You have forgotten how many times I drove you to mental distress causing you to take a hiatus from the forum, so show some respect before I turn up the volume and push you to an unstable mental state. 

You keep making claims but yet I see no proof, now you say that the burden of proof is not necessary. You only need to point out discrepancies, which would not hold up in a court of law as evidence.  So we are not to take you serious as you slander without evidence. 

 As I often say, you live in your own bubble. I have been here almost 15 years and fought with practically everyone and you least of all have never given me cause to pause and reflect on what I write. You are among the most facile of individuals on the board. When people like TK Errol, Mara or Andre ( and he is right here posting not dead as you wished him to be) say something I seldom question it. You on the other hand are a lout.

Again, the "formula" for democracy in Guyana is broken and if broken deliberately it is corruption. That is what we see all over Guyana in the rise of th e obscenely rich in the PPP. Noting these were piss poor critters before entering office one can only conclude they stole their way to the top. Transparency International has concluded exactly that in their recent report. I guess those white folks have it in for the PPP as well!

What qualifies a pretender like you to pronounce that democracy is broken in Guyana when international organizations and reputable nations don't share the same opinion?

You have provided no evidence of your claim that the folks you accuse "stole their way to the top", whatever that means. You engage in mud slinging and have lost credibility. You need to take a break and find your true self once again, the person who looks at facts and not fiction and rumors.

I can give you a dozen scholars to support my case but you do not read. You can also get an inkling from NGOs ike transparency international, etc who say the system is corrupt. Did you not call the UN representative racist when she labeled the society mired in corrupt practices? Facts are not as you make it. It is as they present themselves.