Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

New Islamic State video appears to show beheading of Japanese journalist

 
January 31 at 6:29 PM

The Islamic State released a video Saturday purportedly showing the beheading of Kenji Goto, a Japanese journalist being held hostage by the extremist group, after negotiations for a prisoner exchange stalled.

Japan strongly condemned the killing, saying an “atrocious act of terrorism” had been committed and that the country was “outraged by the horrific act.”

Japanese and Jordanian authorities had been negotiating for days to swap Goto and another hostage, Jordanian pilot Muath al-Kaseasbeh, for an Iraqi woman who is on death row in Jordan for her role in a 2005 triple bombing attack in Amman.

The Islamic State had said that if the woman, Sajida al-Rishawi, was not returned by sunset on Thursday, it would first kill Kaseasbeh, who was captured when his plane crashed in Syria last month, then Goto.

The negotiations appeared to have broken down over Jordan’s insistence on receiving proof the pilot was still alive. Yasuhide Nakayama, Japan’s deputy foreign minister, said late Friday that they were “in a state of deadlock.”

There was no mention of the fate of Kaseasbeh in Saturday’s video, which showed Goto kneeling in the desert wearing an orange outfit, with a black-clad man known as “Jihadi John” standing beside him.

“To the Japanese government: You, like your foolish allies in the Satanic coalition, have yet to understand that we, by Allah’s grace, are an Islamic caliphate with authority and power, an entire army thirsty for your blood,” the man said in English, according to the Site Intelligence group.

“Abe, because of your reckless decision to take part in an unwinnable war, this knife will not only slaughter Kenji, but will also carry on and cause carnage wherever your people are found. So let the nightmare for Japan begin,” the man said.

The video shows Goto’s beheading, then a body lying on the ground with a head on top of it.

The Japanese government condemned the gruesome video.

“I cannot help feeling strong indignation that an inhuman and despicable act of terrorism like this has been committed again,” said Yoshihide Suga, Abe’s chief cabinet secretary, on Sunday local time.

In Washington, White House officials said they were trying to authenticate the video.

“The United States strongly condemns ISIL’s actions, and we call for the immediate release of all the remaining hostages,” said Bernadette Meehan, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council, using an acronym for the Islamic State. “We stand in solidarity with our ally Japan.”

Goto, a 47-year-old father of three, including two daughters under the age of 2, was a freelance video journalist who had been captured by the Islamic State late last year while trying to secure the release of his compatriot, Haruna Yukawa.

Yukawa, a man who had suffered a series of setbacks in his life and had gone to the Middle East on a voyage of self-discovery, appeared to have been beheaded last week. Goto was shown in a previous video holding a photo of an executed man who appeared to be Yukawa.

The two met while traveling in the region. After Yukawa’s capture in August, Goto went back to Syria to try to find him, only to be captured himself in late October.

The men appeared in a hostage video earlier this month while Shinzo Abe, Japan’s prime minister, was on a tour of the Middle East. In Cairo, he pledged $200 million in aid for countries who were taking in refugees from the Islamic State, which has taken over swaths of Syria in particular. The Islamic State initially demanded the same amount as a ransom for the two men. Then, after Yukawa’s execution, changed its demand to the prisoner exchange.

On Friday, Goto’s wife, Rinko, issued her first statement. “I fear that this is the last chance for my husband, and we now have only a few hours left to secure his release and the life of Lt. Muath al-Kaseasbeh,” she wrote. “I beg the Jordanian and Japanese Government to understand that the fates of both men are in their hands.”

Their youngest daughter was only 3 weeks old when Goto left to try to rescue Yukawa, she said.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by TI:

I'm surprised that there is no press when hundreds of Muslims also get their heads sliced off by ISIS. 

Or GNI posts, I wonder why?

The same happen with Black on Black crimes. I guess if you can kill your own why should others complain. Just saying.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:

This is one Group I dont mind the US wipe off the Map!!!!  ISIS that is!!!

I am with you on this one. At this point I don't care who wipe them out. Even if it is the infidels.

FM
Originally Posted by Mars:

Beheading video. Warning - contains graphic content.

 

https://sendvid.com/nphywh91

Not interested man. This shit sickens my stomach. Nowadays, I can't even stomach the beheading of a chicken. These guys are lacking souls and humanity.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:

I used to behead ducks and chickens

Can't do that shit anymore padna.

I am not sure if I can or not....haven't had the opportunity

FM
Originally Posted by GT Stingaa:
Savages damn
He has a very British accent

Stinga, nowadays some people are getting attracted to Islam for a completely different reason than what it used to be. I once read a book written over 50 years of converts to Islam which had some pretty high ranking people. Don't see a link online but this one give some insight  http://islam.about.com/u/sty/converts/converts_st/  Unfortunately the ones getting in to join the blood brigade are in for the wrong reason.

FM

These murderers and terrorist are still Muslims. They read and study the same scripture. 

 

Even though they have a distorted view of Islam and do not represent Islam, their action are considered a reflection of Islam. It is these demons that muslims themselves must confront.

 

Islam is suffering a terrible backlash for the west and peace loving citizens across the world as a result of these madmen.

 

I once posted some very violent verses from the Holy Quran and I am of the opinion that some of these violent verses are being used by these madmen who commit these horrible acts of terrorism.

 

 

FM

Verses don't cause violence. The Japs used to behead their prisoners, they don't have verses. The bible also has violent verses...it doesn't cause violence at least nowadays. 

 

If if you want to find out about ISIS, find out where they get their arms from.

Find out why they want Assad out. Find out why the U.S. and Israel want Assad out also.  Find out why the rebellion was started. 

Did you know the American Aid worker who got beheaded ..Kassig was a Muslim?

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

These murderers and terrorist are still Muslims. They read and study the same scripture. 

 

Even though they have a distorted view of Islam and do not represent Islam, their action are considered a reflection of Islam. It is these demons that muslims themselves must confront. 

 

What is you opinion of the power of numbers yuji?

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

I'm surprised that there is no press when hundreds of Muslims also get their heads sliced off by ISIS. 

Or GNI posts, I wonder why?

 

Bai, Muslims killing Muslims is a normal thing. You barbarians seem to enjoy that.

 

The murderous nature of Muslims only concerns me when they kill humans (i.e. the kuffar)

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

Verses don't cause violence. The Japs used to behead their prisoners, they don't have verses. The bible also has violent verses...it doesn't cause violence at least nowadays. 

 

If if you want to find out about ISIS, find out where they get their arms from.

Find out why they want Assad out. Find out why the U.S. and Israel want Assad out also.  Find out why the rebellion was started. 

Did you know the American Aid worker who got beheaded ..Kassig was a Muslim?

 

 

 

Stop blaming others for acts of terrorists. Terrorism must be condemned.

FM
Originally Posted by Vish M:

It is indeed SAD and repulsive to read some of your comments.

 

This is a Barbaric act.

 

It MUST be REJECTED.

 

This ISIS is a threat to humanity!

Who yuh upset with Vish?

FM
 
 

TheReligionofPeace.com
Guide to Understanding Islam

 

 

What does the 
Religion of Peace
Teach About...

Violence

 
 

Question
:

Does the Quran really contain dozens of verses promoting violence?


Summary Answer
:

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text.  They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran.   

The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways.  Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence.  Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny.  Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed.  Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.


The Quran:

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... 

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

 

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

 

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

 

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

 

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

 

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

 

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

 

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

 

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

 

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

 

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

 

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."   

 

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

 

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

 

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

 

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

 

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people."Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

 

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

 

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

 

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!" 

 

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

 

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians). 

 

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

 

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper." 

 

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?

 

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

 

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).  

 

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

 

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?" 

 

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

 

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test. 

 

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"    

 

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

 

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.

 

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

 

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad&nbsp, and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

 

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

 

Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org


From the Hadith:

 

Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

 

Bukhari (52:256) - The Prophet... was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)."  In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy.  This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

 

Bukhari (52:65) - The Prophet said, 'He who fights that Allah's Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause.  Muhammad's words are the basis for offensive Jihad - spreading Islam by force.  This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today.   

 

Bukhari (52:220) - Allah's Apostle said... 'I have been made victorious with terror'

 

Abu Dawud (14:2526) - The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, "There is no god but Allah" and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

 

Abu Dawud (14:2527) - The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious

 

Muslim (1:33) - the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

 

Bukhari (8:387) - Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'.  And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally."

 

Muslim (1:30) - "The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah."

 

Bukhari (52:73) - "Allah's Apostle said, 'Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords'."  

 

Bukhari (11:626) [Muhammad said:] "I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes."

 

Muslim (1:149) - "Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause..."

 

Muslim (20:4645) - "...He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa'id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!"

 

Muslim (20:4696) - "the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: 'One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'"

 

Muslim (19:4321-4323) - Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers.  His response: "They are of them (meaning the enemy)."

 

Muslim (19:4294) - "When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him... He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war...  When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them... If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them."

 

Bukhari 1:35  "The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed)."  

 

Tabari 7:97  The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power."  Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam.  Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill.  An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

 

Tabari 9:69  "Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us"  The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

 

Tabari 17:187  "'By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.' And they returned to their former religion."  The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah.  The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali. 

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: - “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: - Lest anyone think that cutting off someone's head while screaming 'Allah Akbar!' is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

 

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: - "Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah."  Muhammad's instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

 

Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 - "Embrace Islam... If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship."  One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries.  The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims.  Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad's armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.

 


Additional Notes: 

Other than the fact that Muslims haven't killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion.  Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance.  Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met.  Either situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism.

 

The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran.  Few verses of Islam's most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood.  Those that do are earlier "Meccan" verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones.  The example of Muhammad is that Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims do not have the power and numbers on their side.  Once they do, then things change.

 

Many Muslims are peaceful and do not want to believe what the Quran plainly says.  They reach subjectively for textual context across different suras to try and mitigate the harsher passages.  Even though the Quran itself claims to be clear and complete, Muslim apologists speak of the "risks" of trying to interpret the verses without their "assistance."  Like many religious people, they want the text to fit their pre-established moral framework.

 

Far from being mere history or theological construct, the violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and genocide.  This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni's bloody conquest.  Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam's Genghis Khan) slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction.  Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent.  Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today's Turkey.  Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran.

 

So ingrained is violence in the religion that Islam has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself.  

 

Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own.  On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and even butcheredcaptives.  He actually inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with Hell if they did not.  Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members were slaughtered.  

 

It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim armies waged aggressivecampaigns, and the religion's most dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death.  The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves.  Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to attack in self-defense, this is an oxymoron that is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad.  

 

Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina.  Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that  was sent to take revenge for Muhammad's deadly caravan raids.  The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back.  Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as "same day marriage").  

 

One of Islam's most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: "In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [countries]in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way."  Elsewhere, he notes: "Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the 'homeland of Islam' diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life."

 

The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as "A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Qur'an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], "The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect."

 

Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that "the Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensivejihad at this time," tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule - bound only by the capacity for success. (source)

 

Muhammad's failure to leave a clear line of succession resulted in perpetual internal war following his death.  Those who knew him best first fought to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda or 'Apostasy wars').  Then, within the closer community, early Meccan converts battled later ones.  Hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in.  Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad's own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter - a jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others' throats to this day.  

 

The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace.  If every standard by which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression, warfare...) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be devastating.  Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture, language or life.  Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral progress.  It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed.  It is convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism.

 

This is what makes the Quran's verses of violence so dangerous.  They are given the weight of divine command.  While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book, and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them - outside of opinion.  Indeed, what do they have?  Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam's holiest book either speaks to Allah's hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it's little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community - even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in this way.

 

Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam's most respected philosophers, understood that "the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force", many other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran's near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence.  Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others.  In the West, it is typical for believers to think that their religion must be like Christianity - preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance - because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every way.  They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to learn that the evidence of the Quran and the bloody history of Islam are very much in contradiction to this.

 

Others simply accept the violence.  In 1991, a Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being too Westernized.  A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the "culture", claiming that the father was merely following "the religion" and saying that the couple had to "discipline their daughter or lose respect." (source).  In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious "holy pilgrimage" to Mecca by the Saudi king - without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.

 

For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous.

 

There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran literally... and too many others who couldn't care less about the violence done in the name of Islam.

 

TheReligionofPeace.com Home Page

 

© 2006-2016 TheReligionofPeace.com. All rights reserved.

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member

How an a peaceful person justify this verse ?

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" 

FM

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

How an a peaceful person justify this verse ?

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" 

 

Bai, you're just hating on innocent peace loving Muslims who just want to be able to peacefully kill the kuffar without all this fuss.

FM

"Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text."

 

Here is you problem Yugi. The above is blatantly incorrect. The verses of the Qur'an were reveled (if you care to believe in revelations) at different times and are all surrounded by circumstances. "We revealed the Qur'an in stages so that it can be understood and remembered". There was current relativity to the verses which makes there adherents subscribe to it. Even the verses in chapter 9 that many finds disturbing were revealed in response to the ambush and murder of some Muslims by some Jewish adherents. So while you may find the passages disturbing and you are certainly within your right to do so, the website is misrepresenting the Qur'an by claiming the above. I don't find the Qur'an disturbing because I understand the circumstances behind those verses as well as I look at the Qur'an as a whole. Of course you are perfectly free to believe otherwise. Because I have already recognized the objective of the owners of that website, I wouldn't waste time going through their citations. I doubt I can ever bring them over to my affinity of the Qur'an and I really don't care whether I can or not. I personally don't loose sleep on what people choose to believe. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by ksazma:

"Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text."

 

Here is you problem Yugi. The above is blatantly incorrect. The verses of the Qur'an were reveled (if you care to believe in revelations) at different times and are all surrounded by circumstances. "We revealed the Qur'an in stages so that it can be understood and remembered". There was current relativity to the verses which makes there adherents subscribe to it. Even the verses in chapter 9 that many finds disturbing were revealed in response to the ambush and murder of some Muslims by some Jewish adherents. So while you may find the passages disturbing and you are certainly within your right to do so, the website is misrepresenting the Qur'an by claiming the above. I don't find the Qur'an disturbing because I understand the circumstances behind those verses as well as I look at the Qur'an as a whole. Of course you are perfectly free to believe otherwise. Because I have already recognized the objective of the owners of that website, I wouldn't waste time going through their citations. I doubt I can ever bring them over to my affinity of the Qur'an and I really don't care whether I can or not. I personally don't loose sleep on what people choose to believe. 

 

You can try to twist and turn the facts but it is what it is and that is the reason for these madmen who are using those verses to create hate and murder.

 

FM

Tabari 7:97  The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, "Kill any Jew who falls under your power."  Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad's men because he insulted Islam.  Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill.  An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

"Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text."

 

Here is you problem Yugi. The above is blatantly incorrect. The verses of the Qur'an were reveled (if you care to believe in revelations) at different times and are all surrounded by circumstances. "We revealed the Qur'an in stages so that it can be understood and remembered". There was current relativity to the verses which makes there adherents subscribe to it. Even the verses in chapter 9 that many finds disturbing were revealed in response to the ambush and murder of some Muslims by some Jewish adherents. So while you may find the passages disturbing and you are certainly within your right to do so, the website is misrepresenting the Qur'an by claiming the above. I don't find the Qur'an disturbing because I understand the circumstances behind those verses as well as I look at the Qur'an as a whole. Of course you are perfectly free to believe otherwise. Because I have already recognized the objective of the owners of that website, I wouldn't waste time going through their citations. I doubt I can ever bring them over to my affinity of the Qur'an and I really don't care whether I can or not. I personally don't loose sleep on what people choose to believe. 

 

You can try to twist and turn the facts but it is what it is and that is the reason for these madmen who are using those verses to create hate and murder.

 

I am not trying to twist anything. The people responsible for the book being around today are far greater than I can ever dream to be. If you think that those verses are fueling the current hate and murder, how do you explain most of the past 1500 years when those same verses existed but the current situation didn't?

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

"Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text."

 

Here is you problem Yugi. The above is blatantly incorrect. The verses of the Qur'an were reveled (if you care to believe in revelations) at different times and are all surrounded by circumstances. "We revealed the Qur'an in stages so that it can be understood and remembered". There was current relativity to the verses which makes there adherents subscribe to it. Even the verses in chapter 9 that many finds disturbing were revealed in response to the ambush and murder of some Muslims by some Jewish adherents. So while you may find the passages disturbing and you are certainly within your right to do so, the website is misrepresenting the Qur'an by claiming the above. I don't find the Qur'an disturbing because I understand the circumstances behind those verses as well as I look at the Qur'an as a whole. Of course you are perfectly free to believe otherwise. Because I have already recognized the objective of the owners of that website, I wouldn't waste time going through their citations. I doubt I can ever bring them over to my affinity of the Qur'an and I really don't care whether I can or not. I personally don't loose sleep on what people choose to believe. 

 

You can try to twist and turn the facts but it is what it is and that is the reason for these madmen who are using those verses to create hate and murder.

 

I am not trying to twist anything. The people responsible for the book being around today are far greater than I can ever dream to be. If you think that those verses are fueling the current hate and murder, how do you explain most of the past 1500 years when those same verses existed but the current situation didn't?

 

Here is where the problems lies.

 

These are explicit verses, explicitly calling for the murder of non believers.

 

You can defend it all you want but it is there for all to see. No sane person can justify this.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

 

Here is where the problems lies.

 

These are explicit verses, explicitly calling for the murder of non believers.

 

You can defend it all you want but it is there for all to see. No sane person can justify this.

Are you concerned by the verses or their perceived contribution to the current madness of some Muslims?

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

 

Here is where the problems lies.

 

These are explicit verses, explicitly calling for the murder of non believers.

 

You can defend it all you want but it is there for all to see. No sane person can justify this.

Are you concerned by the verses or their perceived contribution to the current madness of some Muslims?

 

I already made my point. I do not want to be involved in a song and dance here.

 

My position is not anti muslim but anti violence and condemning sources that tolerate and encourage violence be it a Book or a group of very sick individuals from any religious organization.

 

 

 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

 

Here is where the problems lies.

 

These are explicit verses, explicitly calling for the murder of non believers.

 

You can defend it all you want but it is there for all to see. No sane person can justify this.

Are you concerned by the verses or their perceived contribution to the current madness of some Muslims?

 

I already made my point. I do not want to be involved in a song and dance here.

 

My position is not anti muslim but anti violence and condemning sources that tolerate and encourage violence be it a Book or a group of very sick individuals from any religious organization.

 

 

 

You made a point no doubt. Unfortunately it can't be the one you hoped to make. Incidentally you were the only one singing and dancing.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
 

 

Here is where the problems lies.

 

These are explicit verses, explicitly calling for the murder of non believers.

 

You can defend it all you want but it is there for all to see. No sane person can justify this.

Are you concerned by the verses or their perceived contribution to the current madness of some Muslims?

 

I already made my point. I do not want to be involved in a song and dance here.

 

My position is not anti muslim but anti violence and condemning sources that tolerate and encourage violence be it a Book or a group of very sick individuals from any religious organization.

 

 

 

You made a point no doubt. Unfortunately it can't be the one you hoped to make. Incidentally you were the only one singing and dancing.

 

Na Bhai

 

You were dancing around the violent verses.

FM

If you want to find out about the verses, ask ISIS.

 

the problem is (which I find hilarious, btw) everyone in the world rightfully hates ISIS, and they are trying to explain their behavior by conjectures about ISIS verse reading, instead of asking them.

 

however, the fact remains that the entire world, although fighting ISIS is scared shitless of them. Mention an ISIS crisis, and people shitting themselves

 

I find it hard to believe that the entire world of big talkers are fighting a lil raggedly band of desert dwellers and cannot defeat them...unless...the aim is not to defeat them.  

 

Even the brave Canadians went in recently....what happen? Maybe less talk and more action will do the trick. Are people so afraid of losing their heads they really afraid to confront ISIS?

 

 

 

 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×