Skip to main content

There needs to be a ‘New Black Cultural Revolution’

 

Dear Editor,

The designation of 2011 as the Year of People of African Descent is a significant reminder of both the tremendous contributions of Africans to world civilization and the challenges African communities across the world continue to face in the socio-economic political and cultural spheres. While these challenges are consequences of four centuries of formal and informal oppression, some of their geneses are grounded in recent developments in the contemporary world.

In the case of Guyana, the African condition since emancipation has been largely affected by colonialism and the negative competition with Indian Guyanese for control of the Guyanese space. In short, emancipation has not led to true independence for African Guyanese. The quest for that independence, therefore, should be the central issue in this year of the African.  African Guyanese should use this year to begin the process of regaining lost ground, but more importantly to re-assert their co-ownership of Guyana.

First and foremost, the attempt by the Government of Guyana to hijack the programme for the year must be exposed, resisted and blocked at all costs. It is an insult to African Guyanese that their representatives have not been included in the initial deliberations regarding the formulation of the official programme. This action by the government is consistent with its political objective of subtle and not so subtle marginalization and domination of African Guyanese. While the recognition of Africans must be the concern of all Guyanese, it is first and foremost Black People’s business. We cannot, should not and must not have it otherwise. Our strength as a multi-ethnic society is enhanced when our various ethnic groups are afforded the human right of self-definition and self-expression. As the elected government, the PPP administration has a right to facilitate, but it has absolutely no right to use its authority to engage in ethnic politicking.

Second, the year of the Africans must address the major challenges of the African Guyanese community – economic disempowerment, political disenfranchisement and cultural dislocation. It is abundantly clear that while poverty and want affect all ethnic groups, their prevalence in the African Guyanese community threaten the very survival of the group as a co-equal in the reproduction of the national political economy.  This development, which is historically grounded, has consequences for the accumulation of individual and collective wealth and the stability of socio-cultural institutions in the African Guyanese community. Economic power is seen as beyond the reach and capacity of African Guyanese.

Similarly, in the realm of politics African Guyanese have no say in the administration of Guyana. That has had a debilitating effect on the African Guyanese collective psyche. More and more the African Guyanese construction of political power, especially for the youth, is done in non-African terms. This has led to an increasing willingness to collaborate with and accommodate with the ethnic status quo from a position of ethnic inferiority.

The political and economic conditions therefore have had dire consequences for Africans. The sense of ethnic inferiority and self-hate is on the rise. African pride and dignity are fast becoming extinct.

The communities are no longer a source of education, cultural uplift and resistance. Some have become playgrounds for the worst kind of political manoeuvres and bullying.

In the light of the above I wish to make the following recommendations:

That the African Guyanese organizations conduct a fact-finding mission in the African Guyanese communities to determine the extent of the alienation, marginalization and suffering.

That this mission be followed by a national conference to determine the appropriate responses.

That African Guyanese economists and entrepreneurs pool their talents and resources to begin the process of economic revitalization.  Towards this end, priority must be given to an immediate initiative to spur the growth of small business enterprises.

That the African Guyanese communities become a school without walls. Towards this end a massive national literacy campaign should be launched in the African Guyanese communities, which mobilizes all the community’s educators and targets especially the youth for both remedial and advanced educational uplift . That there be a New Black Cultural Revolution aimed at reconnecting African Guyanese to their African roots and raising the level of self-pride, dignity and self love.

That every registered African Guyanese elector be mobilized to cast their vote at the upcoming election.

That the African Guyanese community be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election.

That African Guyanese villages and communities be restored as spaces of culture, enterprise, pride, learning, love, ethnic tolerance and respect between the sexes.

Yours faithfully, David Hinds

 

http://www.stabroeknews.com/20...revolution%e2%80%99/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Kapadilla:

Bai de Indo dem also gat foh free demselves from de mental slavery de PPP bind dem in.

If there is a revolution in Guyana, all them thiefing PPP/C Scumbags would be decimated and their Political Spoil would be handed back to the State.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

The article was since 2011. Has there been any progress since? With all the connections David Hinds has, it would be surprsing if he did not get anything done. And Why? Perhaps, he should concentrate his efforts in only one Afro village. Perfect his ideas and then move it accross to the rest.

 

Laziness is a chronic condition in Guyana-everybody hopes for a job, but working is a different matter.

S
Originally Posted by Nehru:

11+3 mek 14, right??? Me nah too like math.

The Amerinds needs to take note. What progress or changes have occurred since? As Hinds pointed out, likewise  the Amerind communities need to be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election. Too often they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

11+3 mek 14, right??? Me nah too like math.

The Amerinds needs to take note. What progress or changes have occurred since? As Hinds pointed out, likewise  the Amerind communities need to be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election. Too often they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns.

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

11+3 mek 14, right??? Me nah too like math.

The Amerinds needs to take note. What progress or changes have occurred since? As Hinds pointed out, likewise  the Amerind communities need to be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election. Too often they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns.

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

the only change these people have is they stop calling them buck and calling them amerindians 

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

what on earth would a drunk fool like u know about "the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992"??

 

huh?

 

bai look, stick to screaming loud, loud how kwamee anointed u a "stud" in the presence of barat . . . your credibility is good currency dere

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

what on earth would a drunk fool like u know about "the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992"??

 

huh?

 

bai look, stick to screaming loud, loud how kwamee anointed u a "stud" in the presence of barat . . . your credibility is good currency dere

Batty Boy Redux, aren't you happy you move to America, in Guyana or Jamaica you would receive the Buju Banton treatment.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

11+3 mek 14, right??? Me nah too like math.

The Amerinds needs to take note. What progress or changes have occurred since? As Hinds pointed out, likewise  the Amerind communities need to be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election. Too often they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns.

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

Nehru, pay attention to what Hinds is saying here:

 

It is abundantly clear that while poverty and want affect all ethnic groups, their prevalence in the African Guyanese community threaten the very survival of the group as a co-equal in the reproduction of the national political economy.  This development, which is historically grounded, has consequences for the accumulation of individual and collective wealth and the stability of socio-cultural institutions in the African Guyanese community. Economic power is seen as beyond the reach and capacity of African Guyanese.

Similarly, in the realm of politics African Guyanese have no say in the administration of Guyana. That has had a debilitating effect on the African Guyanese collective psyche. More and more the African Guyanese construction of political power, especially for the youth, is done in non-African terms. This has led to an increasing willingness to collaborate with and accommodate with the ethnic status quo from a position of ethnic inferiority.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

what on earth would a drunk fool like u know about "the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992"??

 

huh?

 

bai look, stick to screaming loud, loud how kwamee anointed u a "stud" in the presence of barat . . . your credibility is good currency dere

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

what on earth would a drunk fool like u know about "the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992"??

 

huh?

 

bai look, stick to screaming loud, loud how kwamee anointed u a "stud" in the presence of barat . . . your credibility is good currency dere

Batty Boy Redux, like yug Batty got hot and scratching yuh. Well Officer Nehru dont swing that way. I feel sorry for you but even Elton John may refuse you.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

what on earth would a drunk fool like u know about "the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992"??

 

huh?

 

bai look, stick to screaming loud, loud how kwamee anointed u a "stud" in the presence of barat . . . your credibility is good currency dere

FM

While the recognition of Africans must be the concern of all Guyanese, it is first and foremost Black People’s business. We cannot, should not and must not have it otherwise. Our strength as a multi-ethnic society is enhanced when our various ethnic groups are afforded the human right of self-definition and self-expression. As the elected government, the PPP administration has a right to facilitate, but it has absolutely no right to use its authority to engage in ethnic politicking.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

11+3 mek 14, right??? Me nah too like math.

The Amerinds needs to take note. What progress or changes have occurred since? As Hinds pointed out, likewise  the Amerind communities need to be mobilized to agitate for political power-sharing regardless of the outcome of the election. Too often they allowed themselves to be used as political pawns.


From what I can see 5% of the Indian population (Jagdeo's friends) and the remaining Portuguese and "old money" Red people (Brazzy and his ilk) are doing fine.

 

Every one else is screwed.  I have no doubt that Africans are particularly impacted as they have higher expectations than do Amerindians, who never had any thing. After all Africans were once among the most educated and skilled group (before Burnham destroyed them) and seem now to be dregs, lost and without hope.  Rural black villages and Linden are in deep crisis.

 

Even the impoverished Indian can get psychic glee from "ahbe pan tap", though I don't think the "ahbe" includes them.  But at least it allows them a greater sense of hope.

 

I mean look at Nehru.  Impoverished and illiterate, but still quite happy with the PPP.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Nehru:
 

Bhai, If you knew the condition of the Amerindian People prior to 1992 and look at then now, you will not say such things. Unless you are being Political.

Still almost exclusively poor, and much abused by people from the Coast.

 

All that is different is that they now speak with Guyanese accents, whereas before many along the Brazilian border were de facto Brazilians.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×