You can wonder all you want it will not evade the reality that a murderous lot claiming to be Muslims on the ground that will be exterminated. You are making excuses for them

Since you asked, Iraq was invaded on false information but that invasion was coming regardless. Saddam was in gross threat violation with his gassing of the Kurds. That alone should have had troops to Baghdad.

You are all over. So was Saddam the only leader that was in violation to a minority in a country?

I am all over? I have not yet called you an apologist for these murderers but that is where I am going. I do not care to talk about Saddam. He is dead, the nation was turned over to those claiming a willingness to do better.  I am not dealing with Saddam. I am dealing with a murderous crew that is spreading like a disease across two nations and are now turning up in europe. 

Chief, you're making the point that the US's foreign policy is oil-driven.

I wish to look at that from the angle of those who believe that and that the Western Christians are in some form of war against the Muslims.

Firstly, note that the only conflict where at least one party is non-Muslim is the Israel/Palestinian conflict.In this conflict no Arab country is helping the Hamas military struggle, but the lone contributor is the Shiite Iran. Could this be because half of the Palestinians are Semite? The Arab Palestinians were Arabicized over the years.

Secondly, the US is not at war against any country, but is on a campaign against terrorists with danger or potential danger to the US. Note that

Obama’s foreign policy in Iraq called for 10,000 US special Ops “advisors” to be on the ground – a proposition that Maliki opposed. Obama knows that America is (a) war-weary” and (b) must not fight an asymmetric war with tools like Bush used. He is smart enough to know that drones, attack helicopters, fighter jets, and embedded special Ops forces with sophisticated weaponry can defeat groups like ISIL.

Thirdly, the word Islamicist is used in today’s lexicon to describe people who call themselves Muslims and whose life is consumed by the religion they call Islam.

Well, these people are not following Islam and secondly they are not demographically citizens of any country but extremists of some greater principle than nation-state. When you take this thinking to an extreme you then fall into an ideology as a frame of mind.

This radicalization BTW is what is going on in the UK by British-born “Muslims”.

I take it Chief that you support the use of this sentence by the author of the article you posted "The Muslim world isn’t as ignorant as Christian crusaders, the military industrial complex and the vast know-nothing right wing would have you believe.".

This author Werleman does not mention the sizable oil reserves of the US and Russia as well as that of Saudi Arabia that is not in conflict with the US. For you to take this author seriously you'd have to ask him to show some hard facts, and saying "With a total of 44 U.S. military bases in the Middle East and the Central Asia, we have the Muslim world completely surrounded." does not add to his thesis. C'mon Chief, bring to this forum something of a more serious discourse than this. G_G. Nehru and Baseman would post stuff like this. You are of much superior intellect than these cats.

Nehru

I cannot understand why you choose to make these stupid alleagations against Kari.

Under freedom of speech there are conditions. In this day and age to call someone a terrorist apologist is serious shit.

Attorney Baldeo used to dig holes for others today his ass is looking at jail time.

Hope under freedom of speech you nor your children do not fall in the hole you are digging for others.