Umana Housing Developments….Two overseas-based clients challenge Ramzan again
Umpteen allegations had been raised by victims pertaining to fraud being carried out by housing developer of Umana Developments in the past. Another such has surfaced once more, this time involving two remigrants.
According to Grace Seaforth, Monica Seaforth of London and Patricia Braithwaite of the United States whom are her sisters were defrauded by Chief Executive Officer of Umana Developments Fazil Ramzan.
“When we send somebody at Clay Brick factory, Number Two Canal, to find out about the money he was hiding, and he explained that he was sick and all sort of things…On another occasion he said that he had his henchmen and people them “to deal with y’all”. So when I saw the story in the papers on March 11, 2012 under the title Fazil Ramzan — the story of the man and his doings, I knew this man was lying to people.”
Fazil Ramzan
One of the agreements of purchase that was produced by Seaforth on behalf of her sisters stated that the agreement of sale was entered on September 11, 2008 in Guyana, between Umana Development of Clay Brick Factory, Clay Brick Road, Canal # 2, and West Bank Demerara.
“The Developer hereby acknowledges the sum of $1,350,000 as down payment, on signing of this contract. (b) Balance of down payment of $150,000 to be paid on or before January 15, 2009. (c): Balance of purchase price to be paid from Mortgage proceeds from a mortgage of $12 million with the Purchaser as the Mortgagor,” the agreement stated. “The ‘Developer’ hereby covenants to complete the building on or before May 30, 2009, subject to section (12) of this agreement and covenants to grant the Purchaser possession of the property on payment of full purchase price.”
Miss Seaforth said that one of her sisters, Patricia Braithwaite, of the United States was repaid $700,000 after she took Ramzan to court through a lawyer.
However she had paid the man $1,440,000 and the remainder was not paid over to date.
However, when her other sister Monica Seaforth of London confronted the man he passed off a bounced check written to New Building Society.
“When I visited the Ministry of Housing, Ramzan’s photo was placed on the wall saying the he does not conduct business with the Ministry and is not authorized to do any business on behalf of the Ministry.”
Many persons who were duped into the scheme turned up yesterday at the Brickdam Police Station to give statement against Ramzan who claimed that he was developing a housing scheme at Sarah Johanna on the East Bank of Demerara.
Last year, clients turned up at the former office of a local housing developer in the city to uplift monies which were paid towards a housing project intended for the East Bank of Demerara but which never materialised. Their efforts were in vain.
The victims claimed that Ramzan, of Umana Developments received payments by local and overseas–based Guyanese towards various projects. According to reports no project was ever sanctioned by the commercial banks.
At the same time the developer was engaged in a court battle over the lands intended for the project.
A West Demerara resident, who requested anonymity, said that she had invested some $300,000 towards the project several months ago after making an initial payment of $200,000. She said that she was able to retrieve the initial payment from Ramzan; however, she made numerous unsuccessful attempts to contact the developer as she was no longer interested in the project.
She said she was working at a public agency close to where the developer’s office once was on Brickdam and after making inquiries with Ramzan, she decided to invest monies in the low income homes which were available. She was required to make an initial deposit of 10 per cent of the cost of the house.
The woman noted that the developer had boasted of a “good architectural plan” for the project and as such she indicated to him that she was interested in one of the homes at Sarah Johanna. She said she lost contact with the developer in mid-2009. She noted, however, that one of the man’s employees was looking after the project.
The distraught woman said that she was told by Ramzan’s employee that the business operation had moved to a location in Kitty, from Brickdam, last year, but she learnt that the business subsequently moved from that location after the developer was unable to pay the $150,000 monthly rent.
Additionally, the employee informed her that the transport for the land at Sarah Johanna was in the name of another person and Ramzan was attempting to transfer ownership of the land into his name.
She said the developer had explained to her, initially, that there was a matter before the courts involving the land at Sarah Johanna, between him and squatters who were occupying lands in the area. She said she was later told by another individual who invested money in the project, that Ramzan lost the matter in court last year.
The woman noted that her brother invested $490,000 and a friend who works at an insurance company in the city also invested $500,000 in the project.
Her friend, she noted, was able to collect $100,000 from Ramzan last December but she also lost contact with the developer.