A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
Replies sorted oldest to newest
To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".
To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".
The point is that she's dumb and makes her party look comical at the highest forum on live TV
A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
LOL. I enjoy the speech including the prostate bit.
Slip of the tongue.
A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
LOL. I enjoy the speech including the prostate bit.
Slip of the tongue.
Bai dah nah slip ah tongue. De woman seh statistics show and wan woman tell she so. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel for qualified members.
She was being faithful to new recognition to the other sex! How can one forget Kwame, Mani and Jags?
She was being faithful to new recognition to the other sex! How can one forget Kwame, Mani and Jags?
She didn't say gays or transvestiteS. She said "WOMEN".
A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
Holy smokes. This is terrible.
I always said that AFC's biggest mistake was to exclude Gerhard from being an MP.
She was being faithful to new recognition to the other sex! How can one forget Kwame, Mani and Jags?
She didn't say gays or transvestiteS. She said "WOMEN".
I had long suspect D2/Stormborn to be a Homo hence his inability to differentiate between the sexes. For him/her 'women' means the 'kwame' type
To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".
The point is that she's dumb and makes her party look comical at the highest forum on live TV
+ Author Affiliations
Contrary to the statement by Borchert et al. (1) that âWomen have no prostate âĶ ,â women do have a prostate, the presence of which has clinical significance for the female and for our understanding of the expression of prostate- specific antigen (PSA) in women and its possible implications.
In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.
Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by ZaviaÄiÄ et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.
The female homologue of the male prostate is of clinical significance not only as a focus for acute and chronic infection, but also as the origin of other pathologic entities, including adenocarcinoma (3,4), a cancer which shows, as does its male counterpart, localized expression of PSA and PSAP (3,4).
Thus, there is convincing evidence that prostatic tissue exists in the female, and that the term âfemale prostateâ is both fully justified and preferable to the terminology Skene's glands and ducts. The latter incorrectly implies that some other structure of an extraprostatic nature, rather than the prostate itself, is involved. If the female prostate exhibits the immunopermissiveness observed in the male prostate (5), it may also serve as a site for viral latency and origin of infection in women with human immunodeficiency virus.
Of perhaps equal importance is the expression of PSA (6). The existence in women of the counterpart of the male prostate, shown to express PSA, may provide a note of caution in considering the molecular basis of the apparent anomalous expression of PSA in male and female nonprostatic tissues, e.g., in female breast (1). Given observations on the association of PSA detection in breast cancer with steroid hormonereceptor positive tumors, one may envision (6) the existence of a complex regulatory gene network controlling the expression of PSA in several organs. Therefore, a given tissue (depending on the state of cellular differentiation) may express previously repressed genes after neoplastic transformation. Also, and not mutually exclusive, somatic mutations may lead to specific changes in PSA genes in cancer cell clones (6).
Consider also, as initially pointed out by Longo (7), the forensic implications for alleged cases of rape. In the absence of knowledge of the female prostate and of the possible presence of PSA and PSAP in the normal female ejaculatory fluid, the identification of these supposedly male-specific markers in vaginal secretions may have been â. . . a fait accompliâ (7) to the accused, but possibly innocent, perpetrator. Indeed, judicial miscarriage may have easily occurred when, for example, PSAP has been considered adequate for the identification of sperm spots and its potential origin from the prostate of the female victim was not taken into account. Therefore, the presence of PSA and/or PSAP for the confirmation of spermatic secretion in the absence of spermatozoa has no forensic value. This knowledge of PSAP originating from the female ejaculate was instrumental in the recent acquittal of an alleged rapist in Europe. In this regard, forensic DNA analysis can be expected to play a significant role in the near future.
To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".
The point is that she's dumb and makes her party look comical at the highest forum on live TV
+ Author Affiliations
Contrary to the statement by Borchert et al. (1) that âWomen have no prostate âĶ ,â women do have a prostate, the presence of which has clinical significance for the female and for our understanding of the expression of prostate- specific antigen (PSA) in women and its possible implications.
In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.
Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by ZaviaÄiÄ et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.
The female homologue of the male prostate is of clinical significance not only as a focus for acute and chronic infection, but also as the origin of other pathologic entities, including adenocarcinoma (3,4), a cancer which shows, as does its male counterpart, localized expression of PSA and PSAP (3,4).
Thus, there is convincing evidence that prostatic tissue exists in the female, and that the term âfemale prostateâ is both fully justified and preferable to the terminology Skene's glands and ducts. The latter incorrectly implies that some other structure of an extraprostatic nature, rather than the prostate itself, is involved. If the female prostate exhibits the immunopermissiveness observed in the male prostate (5), it may also serve as a site for viral latency and origin of infection in women with human immunodeficiency virus.
Of perhaps equal importance is the expression of PSA (6). The existence in women of the counterpart of the male prostate, shown to express PSA, may provide a note of caution in considering the molecular basis of the apparent anomalous expression of PSA in male and female nonprostatic tissues, e.g., in female breast (1). Given observations on the association of PSA detection in breast cancer with steroid hormonereceptor positive tumors, one may envision (6) the existence of a complex regulatory gene network controlling the expression of PSA in several organs. Therefore, a given tissue (depending on the state of cellular differentiation) may express previously repressed genes after neoplastic transformation. Also, and not mutually exclusive, somatic mutations may lead to specific changes in PSA genes in cancer cell clones (6).
Consider also, as initially pointed out by Longo (7), the forensic implications for alleged cases of rape. In the absence of knowledge of the female prostate and of the possible presence of PSA and PSAP in the normal female ejaculatory fluid, the identification of these supposedly male-specific markers in vaginal secretions may have been â. . . a fait accompliâ (7) to the accused, but possibly innocent, perpetrator. Indeed, judicial miscarriage may have easily occurred when, for example, PSAP has been considered adequate for the identification of sperm spots and its potential origin from the prostate of the female victim was not taken into account. Therefore, the presence of PSA and/or PSAP for the confirmation of spermatic secretion in the absence of spermatozoa has no forensic value. This knowledge of PSAP originating from the female ejaculate was instrumental in the recent acquittal of an alleged rapist in Europe. In this regard, forensic DNA analysis can be expected to play a significant role in the near future.
Hahahahahahahahahaha so it was you who Garrido - Lowe alluded to when she told the House that a 'woman' told her she has Prostate Cancer. DWL.
And here i was all this time thinking Mitwah was actually a male when in fact he's just a confused fag
A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer
LOL. I enjoy the speech including the prostate bit.
Slip of the tongue.
No Slip of tongue. She was inferring to Alberta, Kwame, Mani, Jaggy... heheheheh! She is being fair to the other "sex".
she made an uneducated mistake, those are of the best that remain in Guyana.
she made an uneducated mistake, those are of the best that remain in Guyana.
In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.
Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by ZaviaÄiÄ et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.
she made an uneducated mistake, those are of the best that remain in Guyana.
Mitwah provided her with the info. He's a transvestite
Another low blow for the AFC in the house of parliament. Moses and Ramjattan are in the shadow of all of this mess. Who wants to be president again in the AFC?
she made an uneducated mistake, those are of the best that remain in Guyana.
Mitwah provided her with the info. He's a transvestite
i think somebody in the ppp call brazil with the caribbean the ABC countries
Access to this requires a premium membership.