Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by KishanB:
Originally Posted by albert:

A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer

 

LOL.  I enjoy the speech including the prostate bit.

 

Slip of the tongue.

Bai dah nah slip ah tongue. De woman seh statistics show and wan woman tell she so. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel for qualified members.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

She was being faithful to new recognition to the other sex! How can one forget Kwame, Mani and Jags?

She didn't say gays or transvestiteS. She said "WOMEN".

I had long suspect D2/Stormborn to be a Homo hence his inability to differentiate between the sexes. For him/her 'women' means the 'kwame' type

FM
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:

To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".

The point is that she's dumb and makes her party look comical at the highest forum on live TV

Albert you are a transsexual, you should know about

The Female Prostate

  1. Milan Zaviačič and         
  2.          
  3. Richard J. Ablin⇓
  4.          

+ Author Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pathology, Comenius University School of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia         
             
  2. Innapharma, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
             
  1. Correspondence to: Richard J. Ablin, Ph.D., Innapharma, Inc., 10 Mountainview Road, Suite 301, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.         

Contrary to the statement by Borchert et al. (1) that “Women have no prostate â€Ķ ,” women do have a prostate, the presence of which has clinical significance for the female          and for our understanding of the expression of prostate- specific antigen (PSA) in women and its possible implications.         

In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra          that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly          to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.         

Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by Zaviačič et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical          studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and          ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.         

The female homologue of the male prostate is of clinical significance not only as a focus for acute and chronic infection,          but also as the origin of other pathologic entities, including adenocarcinoma (3,4), a cancer which shows, as does its male counterpart, localized expression of PSA and PSAP (3,4).         

Thus, there is convincing evidence that prostatic tissue exists in the female, and that the term “female prostate” is both          fully justified and preferable to the terminology Skene's glands and ducts. The latter incorrectly implies that some other          structure of an extraprostatic nature, rather than the prostate itself, is involved. If the female prostate exhibits the immunopermissiveness          observed in the male prostate (5), it may also serve as a site for viral latency and origin of infection in women with human immunodeficiency virus.         

Of perhaps equal importance is the expression of PSA (6). The existence in women of the counterpart of the male prostate, shown to express PSA, may provide a note of caution in considering          the molecular basis of the apparent anomalous expression of PSA in male and female nonprostatic tissues, e.g., in female breast          (1). Given observations on the association of PSA detection in breast cancer with steroid hormonereceptor positive tumors, one          may envision (6) the existence of a complex regulatory gene network controlling the expression of PSA in several organs. Therefore, a given          tissue (depending on the state of cellular differentiation) may express previously repressed genes after neoplastic transformation.          Also, and not mutually exclusive, somatic mutations may lead to specific changes in PSA genes in cancer cell clones (6).         

Consider also, as initially pointed out by Longo (7), the forensic implications for alleged cases of rape. In the absence of knowledge of the female prostate and of the possible          presence of PSA and PSAP in the normal female ejaculatory fluid, the identification of these supposedly male-specific markers          in vaginal secretions may have been “. . . a fait accompli” (7) to the accused, but possibly innocent, perpetrator. Indeed, judicial miscarriage may have easily occurred when, for example,          PSAP has been considered adequate for the identification of sperm spots and its potential origin from the prostate of the          female victim was not taken into account. Therefore, the presence of PSA and/or PSAP for the confirmation of spermatic secretion          in the absence of spermatozoa has no forensic value. This knowledge of PSAP originating from the female ejaculate was instrumental          in the recent acquittal of an alleged rapist in Europe. In this regard, forensic DNA analysis can be expected to play a significant          role in the near future.         

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org...tent/90/9/713.1.full

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:

To put it in the words of the famous Stormy: "Your point is simply you rely too much on hear say evidence".

The point is that she's dumb and makes her party look comical at the highest forum on live TV

Albert you are a transsexual, you should know about

The Female Prostate

  1. Milan Zaviačič and         
  2.          
  3. Richard J. Ablin⇓
  4.          

+ Author Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pathology, Comenius University School of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia         
             
  2. Innapharma, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
             
  1. Correspondence to: Richard J. Ablin, Ph.D., Innapharma, Inc., 10 Mountainview Road, Suite 301, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.         

Contrary to the statement by Borchert et al. (1) that “Women have no prostate â€Ķ ,” women do have a prostate, the presence of which has clinical significance for the female          and for our understanding of the expression of prostate- specific antigen (PSA) in women and its possible implications.         

In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra          that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly          to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.         

Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by Zaviačič et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical          studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and          ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.         

The female homologue of the male prostate is of clinical significance not only as a focus for acute and chronic infection,          but also as the origin of other pathologic entities, including adenocarcinoma (3,4), a cancer which shows, as does its male counterpart, localized expression of PSA and PSAP (3,4).         

Thus, there is convincing evidence that prostatic tissue exists in the female, and that the term “female prostate” is both          fully justified and preferable to the terminology Skene's glands and ducts. The latter incorrectly implies that some other          structure of an extraprostatic nature, rather than the prostate itself, is involved. If the female prostate exhibits the immunopermissiveness          observed in the male prostate (5), it may also serve as a site for viral latency and origin of infection in women with human immunodeficiency virus.         

Of perhaps equal importance is the expression of PSA (6). The existence in women of the counterpart of the male prostate, shown to express PSA, may provide a note of caution in considering          the molecular basis of the apparent anomalous expression of PSA in male and female nonprostatic tissues, e.g., in female breast          (1). Given observations on the association of PSA detection in breast cancer with steroid hormonereceptor positive tumors, one          may envision (6) the existence of a complex regulatory gene network controlling the expression of PSA in several organs. Therefore, a given          tissue (depending on the state of cellular differentiation) may express previously repressed genes after neoplastic transformation.          Also, and not mutually exclusive, somatic mutations may lead to specific changes in PSA genes in cancer cell clones (6).         

Consider also, as initially pointed out by Longo (7), the forensic implications for alleged cases of rape. In the absence of knowledge of the female prostate and of the possible          presence of PSA and PSAP in the normal female ejaculatory fluid, the identification of these supposedly male-specific markers          in vaginal secretions may have been “. . . a fait accompli” (7) to the accused, but possibly innocent, perpetrator. Indeed, judicial miscarriage may have easily occurred when, for example,          PSAP has been considered adequate for the identification of sperm spots and its potential origin from the prostate of the          female victim was not taken into account. Therefore, the presence of PSA and/or PSAP for the confirmation of spermatic secretion          in the absence of spermatozoa has no forensic value. This knowledge of PSAP originating from the female ejaculate was instrumental          in the recent acquittal of an alleged rapist in Europe. In this regard, forensic DNA analysis can be expected to play a significant          role in the near future.         

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org...tent/90/9/713.1.full

Hahahahahahahahahaha so it was you who Garrido - Lowe alluded to when she told the House that a 'woman' told her she has Prostate Cancer. DWL.

And here i was all this time thinking Mitwah was actually a male when in fact he's just a confused fag 

FM
Originally Posted by KishanB:
Originally Posted by albert:

A MUST WATCH: AFC MP tells Parliament women too can be afflicted with prostate cancer

 

LOL.  I enjoy the speech including the prostate bit.

 

Slip of the tongue.

No Slip of tongue. She was inferring to Alberta, Kwame, Mani, Jaggy... heheheheh! She is being fair to the other "sex".

Mitwah

 

Originally Posted by kp:

she made an uneducated mistake, those are of the best that remain in Guyana.

In 1672 the anatomist Regnier de Graaf described and illustrated a set of glands and ducts surrounding the female urethra          that he called the female prostate. Subsequently, in 1880, Alexander Skene redirected attention to this structure, particularly          to two paraurethral ducts (Skene's ducts) therein, and emphasized their importance in infection of the female genitalia.         

Skene's paraurethral glands and ducts are homologous to the male prostate (2). Recent studies supporting this homology, as reviewed by Zaviačič et al. (3,4), are postmortem and detailed histological examinations of the urethras of 130 women, followed by biochemical and immunohistochemical          studies that demonstrated expression of PSA and prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) in Skene's paraurethral glands and          ducts. These studies unequivocally substantiate the existence of the female prostate.         

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×