Looking at the GEOCOM results, it appears to me, that with such a slim (I call 1 seat, slim) margin, Nagamottoo delivered the defeat of the PPP more than a victory for APNU and the coalition. Notwithstanding that the PPP needed to be taught a lesson, I think a larger margin would have been needed to really say that the coalition won the confidence of the people. As it is, they merely won, but a victory is a victory, and yes, the PPP needed to be taken down a peg. It is hard to deny the corruption and disregard for what the population was thinking of them. I think people just got fed up. Like all dictators, they started off talking about the people, than ended up talking about themselves to the exclusion of the people who were depending on them to deliver betterment in their lives.
Change is a good thing, and this might give the PPP pause to look at themselves and implement some long needed changes. Yes I agree with Joey Jagan, even though he may be erratic at times. If the PPP wants to be a force for change in the future, they must be contrite for the mistakes they made and must revamp the party. It is a very good opportunity for them to do so while the attention is on the new government. The supporters of the coalition will expect them to deliver, they should!! The PPP old timers must go or play less public roles. The country needs to see new faces in the leadership of the party or else they will be viewed with the same old suspicion. And they need to move away from the bottom house style of politics if they want people to follow them again, or risk becoming irrelevant in the future of Guyana. They cannot remain mired in an old way of doing things or they risk their support base moving ahead of them and looking for a better party in whom to trust.
As I said before, a win is a win, but I do believe that they were manipulations with respect to the ballot boxes. And I believe that was why there was such a rush to declare the elections. Once declared, it would be hard to overturn the decision, because of the turmoil and confusion that would accompany such a move. And the ABC countries also know this; that is why they also pressed for the declaration. If they were so confident of the count, then recounting would not be an issue, because the result would be the same. Other countries with much more huge voting populations have done so. This would have solidified Granger's and Nagamootoo's positions.
Mr Granger surely cannot be feeling like a true winner with such a small margin, delivered no doubt by Mr. Nagamootoo's AFC, and not having the comfort that a recount would have given him, assuming the results would be in his favour. Add to that the fact that almost half of the country did not vote for the coalition, much less his APNU segment of the coalition (we will never know this for sure).
We are in for interesting times in Guyana; Nagamootoo will press for reforming, i.e. reducing, the power of the Presidency in favour of the Prime Minister. I cannot believe that he pooled with APNU to simply hand total power to them. I believe his motivations are good as are Mr. Granger's, but I also believe the old ideological instincts are alive and well in both of them.
The question for Mr. Granger is whether he can curtail the old instincts of some of his PNC/APNU partners, and prevent them from viewing the win as "we time now". Any reversion to type within the APNU could unravel the coalition quicker than it took to collate. Remember they collated just to fight the election and dump the PPP, not because they share the same ideology, at least I do not think so.
In any event, this is supposed to be about the people of Guyana, all of them. We have had almost 50 years of the racial politics of the PNC and PPP, which has not taken Guyana too far, and kept alive racial politics and fear. True the PPP got us out of the mess of the PNC, but they forgot along the way, what their mission was supposed to be. Maybe the coalition is the beginning of the end of the politics of the PNC and PPP and a true new beginning whereby the wellbeing of the nation becomes more important than who is delivering it.
As and ending note, I looked at the promises of Mr. Granger and said, "here we go again". Big promises and not enough money to deliver on them. We are in for more interesting times.