Skip to main content

It is sickening that Minister Edghill is ignorant of how human rights are applied

 

June 19, 2014

 

Dear Editor,

It is good that Junior Minister of Finance Juan Edghill and Pastor McGarell expressed their views about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered Guyanese. It is important in Guyana that people air their prejudices openly and even in jokes – people make racist, sexist jokes as well homophobic jokes – so that we could know how people are thinking.

What is sickening though, is that in 2014 Guyana, there is a Minister of Government who is ignorant of how human rights are applied and who believes that it is possible to say no discrimination against LGBT Guyanese while also engaging in activism fuelled on some of the most bizarre assumptions to ensure that the discrimination remains institutionalised in the laws of Guyana.

It should not be up to Minister Edghill or his cabinet colleagues to decide when and who they will discriminate against. The members of parliament are responsible for ensuring that the constitution and the laws of Guyana protect Guyana’s LGBT citizens according to Guyana’s human rights obligations.

What is sickening also, is how the activism to promote discrimination against LGBT Guyanese is fuelled by the assumptions that LGBT Guyanese will somehow destroy families, and the heterosexual “lifestyle.” Minister Edghill in 2010 abused his position at the Ethnic Relations Commission to say that the lives of children were endangered by an LGBT film festival. There are other claims which are made that LGBT Guyanese bring the violence on themselves, even though no one has been charged for the murders of Tiffany Holder, Delon Melville (whose righteous neighbours kept shouting at him that no “antiman” must live in Mocha) and Nandkumar Poonwassie.

Those of us who do not have the same religious views as Minister Edghill should be happy to hear the joking comments and the words which are not from the heart about the wrath of God coming down on everybody because of the actions of a few. It is good when these views are expressed publicly, because then we know what lurks in the hearts and minds of those who believe that Guyana’s mess is due to others. The wrath of God is not only about same sex love, but also about idolatory and many of us, Hindus especially, have been often reminded that unless we are saved, we will face the wrath of God. No one knows though how to interpret the wrath of God with the issues around the anti-money laundering bill (Minister Edghill and some pastors met with President Ramotar to discuss this) or whether the wrath of God will be felt if we ever have local government elections.

Minister Edghill spoke about the gay agenda and it seems that he and his colleagues feel that their form of loving would be threatened if LGBT Guyanese could be recognised as entitled to their form of consensual loving. The irony is that Minster Edghill’s homophobia is the sacred cow, protected and rewarded as is evidenced by the rewarding of his homophobic activism by a cabinet post paid for by the taxes of, among others, Guyanese who believe that LGBT Guyanese are entitled to the same rights as Minister Edghill and his colleagues.

One wonders what other prejudices lurk in the hearts and minds of President Ramotar’s cabinet, and what are the differences when they ‘represent the administration’ and when they do ‘not represent the administration.’

Yours faithfully, Vidyaratha Kissoon

 

http://www.stabroeknews.com/20...uman-rights-applied/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by kp:

The PPP gave Guyana it's first gay President, BJ.

Bai, how come dem boys seh de man BJ was screwing Plumpy Manishwand and one ah dem Jenniffa minista? Gay man dont do dat.

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Is Vidyaratha a Lesbian?

President should convene tribunal to investigate McCoy

October 1, 2009 | By | Filed Under News 

 

 … says Rights of the Child Commissioner

 

The Speaker of the National Assembly should ask President Bharrat Jagdeo to convene a tribunal to investigate allegations that Rights of the Child Commissioner, Kwame McCoy, is recorded soliciting sexual favours from a 15-year-old boy, says McCoy’s fellow Commissioner, Vidyaratha Kissoon.

Rights of the Child Commissioner Vidyaratha Kissoon holds up a placard calling for speedy enactment of the Sexual Offences Law during a protest outside Office of the President recently.

Rights of the Child Commissioner Vidyaratha Kissoon holds up a placard calling for speedy enactment of the Sexual Offences Law during a protest outside Office of the President recently.

Further, Kissoon suggests that McCoy should recuse himself from any of the activities of the Commission until such time as the tribunal makes its findings available.

The Rights of the Child Commission is a constitutional body that is mandated to report directly to the National Assembly. Since the members of the Commission were sworn in on May 8, no meeting has been called to elect a chairperson, and as such the Commission is currently now not functioning.

A further bugbear is the fact that the constitution stipulates that the Secretariat for the Human Rights Commission will serve as the secretariat for the Rights of the Child, Indigenous, and the Gender Equality Commissions, but there is no Human Rights Commission as yet.

Kissoon is the first Commissioner to go public about the allegations surrounding McCoy, even though he says he has not heard the tape and has no interest in listening to it, since he cannot make a judgement as to whether the person on the tape is indeed that of McCoy.

Kissoon is a well know civil society activist and has been joining a protest in front of the Office of the President for the last four months to raise awareness about the abuse of children.

Writing on his blog (churchroadman.blogspot.com), Kissoon said that he would expect that any of the commissioners on the rights various rights commissions would step aside, if subject to any allegations of misbehaviour or misdemeanour.

“This includes me, much as it would go against my sense of justice,” Kissoon writes.

He quotes Article 225 of the Constitution, which provides for the removal of any commissioner on any of the four rights Commissions.

“The Constitution suggests that the Speaker of the National Assembly , who is the prescribed authority (Article 212 Y (4) ), can request of the President that the removal of the officer be investigated, following which a tribunal is established from within the Judicial Services Commission who could then investigate and make a recommendation,” Kissoon states.

He also suggests that those who are looking into the best interests of the child whose voice is supposed to be on the tape, ensure that the Child Care and Protection Agency meet with the child and the parents to ensure that the child is safe and at school.

He also feels that the tape and references to the child’s birth date should stop being circulated since it is harmful to continue to further expose the child.

Regarding McCoy, Kissoon says his gut reaction is that it is unfair that someone’s life and work could be disrupted by allegations made against them which could take a long time to be investigated.

However, he writes that he is “coming around to accepting that if one accepts any public office, then implicit in this acceptance is that one should be prepared to step aside if allegations are to be investigated.”

President Jagdeo has promised to look into the allegations against McCoy, who is the second most senior functionary within the Press and Publicity Unit in the Presidential Secretariat.

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×