- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Former Member
It is rather disingenuous for the government to name their publication "Washington Diplomat". That is deliberately deceptive.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
It is rather disingenuous for the government to name their publication "Washington Diplomat". That is deliberately deceptive.
Our White Masters are back!
Former Member
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
It is rather disingenuous for the government to name their publication "Washington Diplomat". That is deliberately deceptive.
Our White Masters are back!
"Our"!!!!. What is your gripe with white peeps?
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
It is rather disingenuous for the government to name their publication "Washington Diplomat". That is deliberately deceptive.
Our White Masters are back!
"Our"!!!!. What is your gripe with white peeps?
Don't you see it? They came to dictate to us the right way of living, like the prophets of Antiquity did.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Lucas:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
It is rather disingenuous for the government to name their publication "Washington Diplomat". That is deliberately deceptive.
Our White Masters are back!
"Our"!!!!. What is your gripe with white peeps?
Don't you see it? They came to dictate to us the right way of living, like the prophets of Antiquity did.
One can always look backward for patterns of poor behavior as a template for the present. However, that is not the pressing problem. It is present victimizers that need the attention.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
3,156 online (0 members
/
3,156 guests)