UNICEF finds 47.5% of children under 16 living in poverty in Guyana
October 15, 2016 By
With 36 per cent of the country living in poverty, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has found
Poverty is massive
Replies sorted oldest to newest
So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one 
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
The funny thing they don't read the article before commenting or posting.
Guyana Times does always comes up with those breaking news headlines.
Drugb should take a peek here http://www.unicef.org/guyana/
Former Member
Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
UNICEF Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Guyana 2016, “poverty in Guyana has a child’s face,” revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006,
Drugb,you are loosing your credibility....read slowly.
I think is that water he swallowed after swimming in the river at the spot that he picked. Anyone who knows that spot by the market knows what I am on about.
Former Member
Django posted:Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
UNICEF Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Guyana 2016, “poverty in Guyana has a child’s face,” revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006,
Drugb,you are loosing your credibility....read slowly.
As I stated the reporter mistyped. Do you really believe that UNICEF would produce a 2016 report and quote 2006 info, 10 years old?
Drugb posted:Django posted:Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
UNICEF Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Guyana 2016, “poverty in Guyana has a child’s face,” revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006,
Drugb,you are loosing your credibility....read slowly.
As I stated the reporter mistyped. Do you really believe that UNICEF would produce a 2016 report and quote 2006 info, 10 years old?
revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
Read the highlighted.......poverty is nothing new in the homeland.
I am done.....no more reply on this topic.
Former Member
Exactly what's the relevance of the reference to 2006?
Former Member
Django posted:Drugb posted:Django posted:Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
UNICEF Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Guyana 2016, “poverty in Guyana has a child’s face,” revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006,
Drugb,you are loosing your credibility....read slowly.
As I stated the reporter mistyped. Do you really believe that UNICEF would produce a 2016 report and quote 2006 info, 10 years old?
revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
Read the highlighted.......poverty is nothing new in the homeland.
I am done.....no more reply on this topic.
The fact that a typo by the reporter rattles your nerves is not my concern. When the actual report is available online I will try to post so you can have sleepless nights that your PNC have destroyed the nation.
Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
There is no typo, the data is from 2006. Read below and try to understand better this time.
http://www.kaieteurnewsonline....ce-unicef-concludes/
Poverty in Guyana has a child’s face – UNICEF concludes
Oct 05, 2016 News 0 Comments
Guyana is arguably the third poorest country in the Western Hemisphere and children are the ones suffering the brunt of the associated poverty dilemma.
This deduction was made after consideration was given to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita which suggests that Guyana’s poverty situation follows what obtains in Haiti and Nicaragua.
The forgoing is contained in a recently launched Situation Analysis of Women and Children Report that was completed by the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF).
The analysis was carried out between 2015 and 2016 by Government through the Ministry of Social Protection, with support from a number of partners. Technical support was provided by UNICEF.
It is expected that the analysis will pave the way for the systematic monitoring of the situation of children and women living in Guyana.
According to the Report not only is unemployment high but it is particularly disconcerting for the young population, which represents more than 60 per cent of Guyana’s population. “Since 2002, youth unemployment has been consistently higher than 30 per cent and is currently estimated to be about 40 per cent,” the Report outlines.
Guyana’s latest official poverty measurement was done in 2006, prior to the economic crisis that hit the world in 2008. According to that measure, 36.1 per cent of the population in the country was living in poverty, including 18.6 per cent that were living in extreme poverty.
And the Report has been able to ascertain that “poverty is higher in the interior of the country, and for those families living in the rural areas including rural in the coast.”
In fact the Report has concluded that “Poverty in Guyana has a child’s face.”
Similar to previous measurements, the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones. It has been revealed, too, that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16-25 lived in poverty in 2006. Almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006.
Guyana, according to the Report, is susceptible to a variety of hazards including flooding, landslides, drought, fires, and severe weather systems, among others. Between 1990 and 2014, floods were the main natural disaster that happened in the country and primarily responsible for deaths.
Flooding was found to be common in the coastal areas and in the interior of the country. In the coastal area, an extensive sea defence system of sea walls and dams is the main defence against inundation of the coastal plain due to heavy rainfall, overtopping of the river networks, and breaches in the conservancies or seawall.
In the interior, heavy rains and the abundance of rivers create the conditions for constant increases in the water levels. Natural disasters create an extra stress on public finances and significant impact on homes, businesses and human life. In this sense, almost 94 per cent of the negative impact in the country’s economy resulted from past floods.
The country has a body of legislation that protects the rights of children, women and other vulnerable populations. Some of the legislation is considered to be updated and in line with international standards.
Nevertheless, the implementation of the legislation was identified as one of the major bottlenecks in the country for the three main sectors related to children (health, education and child protection).
This deduction was made after consideration was given to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita which suggests that Guyana’s poverty situation follows what obtains in Haiti and Nicaragua.
The forgoing is contained in a recently launched Situation Analysis of Women and Children Report that was completed by the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF).
The analysis was carried out between 2015 and 2016 by Government through the Ministry of Social Protection, with support from a number of partners. Technical support was provided by UNICEF.
It is expected that the analysis will pave the way for the systematic monitoring of the situation of children and women living in Guyana.
According to the Report not only is unemployment high but it is particularly disconcerting for the young population, which represents more than 60 per cent of Guyana’s population. “Since 2002, youth unemployment has been consistently higher than 30 per cent and is currently estimated to be about 40 per cent,” the Report outlines.
Guyana’s latest official poverty measurement was done in 2006, prior to the economic crisis that hit the world in 2008. According to that measure, 36.1 per cent of the population in the country was living in poverty, including 18.6 per cent that were living in extreme poverty.
And the Report has been able to ascertain that “poverty is higher in the interior of the country, and for those families living in the rural areas including rural in the coast.”
In fact the Report has concluded that “Poverty in Guyana has a child’s face.”
Similar to previous measurements, the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones. It has been revealed, too, that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16-25 lived in poverty in 2006. Almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006.
Guyana, according to the Report, is susceptible to a variety of hazards including flooding, landslides, drought, fires, and severe weather systems, among others. Between 1990 and 2014, floods were the main natural disaster that happened in the country and primarily responsible for deaths.
Flooding was found to be common in the coastal areas and in the interior of the country. In the coastal area, an extensive sea defence system of sea walls and dams is the main defence against inundation of the coastal plain due to heavy rainfall, overtopping of the river networks, and breaches in the conservancies or seawall.
In the interior, heavy rains and the abundance of rivers create the conditions for constant increases in the water levels. Natural disasters create an extra stress on public finances and significant impact on homes, businesses and human life. In this sense, almost 94 per cent of the negative impact in the country’s economy resulted from past floods.
The country has a body of legislation that protects the rights of children, women and other vulnerable populations. Some of the legislation is considered to be updated and in line with international standards.
Nevertheless, the implementation of the legislation was identified as one of the major bottlenecks in the country for the three main sectors related to children (health, education and child protection).
The data is taken from the worldwide UNICEF MICS survey which was done in 2006.
http://guyanachronicle.com/201...gration-on-families/
UNICEF report highlights impact of migration on families
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter
A REPORT compiled by the United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) revealed that mass emigration of Guyanese due to failures in the job market creates devastating social and economic effects and has resulted in broken families, brain drain and an estimated 8% loss of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP).The report on the 2016 Guyana Situation Analysis of Children and Women (SitAn), a document compiled through a cooperative effort between UNICEF and Government of Guyana, was handed over to First Lady Sandra Granger and Minister of Social Protection, Volda Lawrence at a special ceremony at the Herdmanston Lodge Wednesday.
The report was prepared with the objective of supporting the new government in its development and implementation of national strategic plans and programmes. The goal of the report is to “advance the realization of the rights of development of Guyanese children with a strong equity focus on the most vulnerable children and their families.”
The report noted that 422, 000 Guyanese live in other countries and while this relocation contributes to the country’s economy through the influx of remittances, such high emigration is influenced by “lack of internal economic opportunities, indicating failures in the job market.”
“On one hand, the influx of remittances is an important factor for the country’s economy and represents an informal safety net for many families. On the other hand, high emigration is influenced by lack of internal economic opportunities, indicating failures in the job market. On the economic side, this brain drain creates losses of around 8% of the country’s GDP. On the social side, emigration breaks families and force children to live far from one or two parents.”
The report said despite Guyana’s good GDP performance, in taking into consideration the GDP per capita, the country remains the third poorest in the Western Hemisphere, after Haiti and Nicaragua.
“Unemployment is high, and it is particularly concerning for the young population, which represents more than 60% of Guyana’s population. Since 2002, youth unemployment has been consistently higher than 30% and is currently estimated to be about 40%.”
The country’s last official poverty measurement was done in 2006, even before the world was hit by economic crises in 2008, and according to that report, some 36.1% of the population was living in poverty and 18.6% were living in extreme poverty.
“Poverty is higher in the interior of the country, and for those families living in the rural areas … Poverty in Guyana has a child’s face. Similar to previous measurements, the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.”
It also disclosed that 33.7% of young people between ages 16-25 lived in poverty in 2006, and 47.5% of children below the age of 17 were poor.
Former Member
Doesn't this conflict with the US position that Guyana is now an upper mid-income nation? The fact that Guyanese are no longer a major visa violation risk and the US giving many Guyanese holiday visa is a testament to this.
These reports need to be taken in context. What matter is the actions and behavior of the masses. The fact that Guyanese (until 2015) were no longer risking everything to flee says a lot. The fact that Guyanese are once again (past year) seeking to leave in droves, well that's for the PNC to address!
Former Member
Drugb posted:Don't get your panties wet....
A Jalilian expression. You did absorb something from that man, Drugb. Thanks for keeping Jalil's spirit alive.
Former Member
Drugb posted:Django posted:Drugb posted:Django posted:Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
UNICEF Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Guyana 2016, “poverty in Guyana has a child’s face,” revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006,
Drugb,you are loosing your credibility....read slowly.
As I stated the reporter mistyped. Do you really believe that UNICEF would produce a 2016 report and quote 2006 info, 10 years old?
revealing that the poverty number from 2006 shows that younger age cohorts have a significantly higher poverty headcount than older ones.
Read the highlighted.......poverty is nothing new in the homeland.
I am done.....no more reply on this topic.
The fact that a typo by the reporter rattles your nerves is not my concern. When the actual report is available online I will try to post so you can have sleepless nights that your PNC have destroyed the nation.
It is not a typo but a glitch in your processing ability. These days you forgo that faculty in preference to a convenient lie.
Mr.T posted:I think is that water he swallowed after swimming in the river at the spot that he picked. Anyone who knows that spot by the market knows what I am on about.
He was warned by Stormy about that yellowish/brown tint.
Former Member
nah, this rass started under that dumb ass ramutar but Granja accelerated it. PPP and PNC got big hand in this mess.
Former Member
Drugb posted:UNICEF finds 47.5% of children under 16 living in poverty in Guyana
October 15, 2016 By EditorWith 36 per cent of the country living in poverty, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has found
that 47.5 per cent of In addition, the analysis pointed to the fact that the 2014 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey(MICS) did not calculate poverty rates for the country but used a quintile wealth index to differentiate wealth across households, from poorest to richest and the survey confirmed two main disparities in Guyana: the difference between rural and urban, and the difference between coastal and interior regions.
Druggie, which party was in power in 2014. This was a report RELEASED in 2016, based on data collected in 2014.
Former Member
Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
NO druggie. The data used in the report was based on conditions obtaining in 2014.
Any way thanks for confirming why so many Guyanese flock to Nevis, or Saba for work. So that they can send back money so that their starving children can eat.
Former Member
ba$eman posted:Doesn't this conflict with the US position that Guyana is now an upper mid-income nation? !
Guyana is a LOWER middle income nation. Check IMF and World Bank data before you spout.
Former Member
caribny posted:ba$eman posted:Doesn't this conflict with the US position that Guyana is now an upper mid-income nation? !
Guyana is a LOWER middle income nation. Check IMF and World Bank data before you spout.
Lower mid, better then upper low or low, still conflicts and a far cry from the PNC destitution of 1992!!
Former Member
ba$eman posted:Lower mid, better then upper low or low, still conflicts and a far cry from the PNC destitution of 1992!!
Of course Guyana was on the recovery by 1992, as Hoyte reversed the Burnham initiatives, which had been enthusiastically endorsed by Cheddi.
Did Cheddi protest the nationalization of the economy? No! In fact he screamed that Bookers should have also been nationalized, and if course this is what Burnham eventually did.
Just be glad that the death of Burnham, Hoyte reforms, and the end of the Cold War blocked Janet for converting Guyana into a Castro satellite.
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:Mars posted:So the PNC are responsible for poverty in 2006? You're a funny one
It stated that 33.7 per cent of young people aged 16 to 25 years lived in poverty in 2006, while almost half of all children aged 16 and below were poor (47.5 per cent) in 2006. It indicated that data on child poverty was not disaggregated for different ethnicities, regions and/or areas of the country.
Don't get your panties wet, the reporter typed incorrectly, it should be 2016.
NO druggie. The data used in the report was based on conditions obtaining in 2014.
Any way thanks for confirming why so many Guyanese flock to Nevis, or Saba for work. So that they can send back money so that their starving children can eat.
Unicef don't use 2 year old data, they use current, else they bypass issuing report for that country if data is not available.
Former Member
Drugb posted:Unicef don't use 2 year old data, they use current, else they bypass issuing report for that country if data is not available.
Current data isn't even available in an advanced nation like the USA, much less a backward country like Guyana.
Data must be collected, compiled, analyzed and then put into a report. The report itself references 2014 data.
Must I teach you everything?
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:Unicef don't use 2 year old data, they use current, else they bypass issuing report for that country if data is not available.
Current data isn't even available in an advanced nation like the USA, much less a backward country like Guyana.
Data must be collected, compiled, analyzed and then put into a report. The report itself references 2014 data.
Must I teach you everything?
The data in Guyana is quite easily gathered given the small population. Hence the 2016 report which clearly offers a referendum on the incompetent PNC regime that has ruined the nation in a short year and a half.
Former Member
Drugb posted:The data in Guyana is quite easily gathered given the small population.
Listen idiot in the USA most data comes from sample sizes using sophisticated statistical methodologies
Your PPP took the 2012 census, and wasn't even able to release the data in full by 2015. And this is something as easy as counting how many Indians, Africans, Amerindians and others live in Guyana, and in what regions.
More indepth data collection and analysis takes even longer. Do you know anything about data collection?
This is 2014 data which shows that under the PPP massive poverty existed. And why the shock as unskilled and impoverished Guyanese flocked to Saba to do what ever the locals on that island don't want to do. Others flocked to Montserrat, breathing in noxious volcanic fumes.
It takes a truly desperate person to do all of this.
"Your PPP took the 2012 census, and wasn't even able to release the data in full by 2015."
They didn't want it to be known,the drop of the East Indians in the population,due to the elections.
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:The data in Guyana is quite easily gathered given the small population.
Listen idiot in the USA most data comes from sample sizes using sophisticated statistical methodologies
Your PPP took the 2012 census, and wasn't even able to release the data in full by 2015. And this is something as easy as counting how many Indians, Africans, Amerindians and others live in Guyana, and in what regions.
More indepth data collection and analysis takes even longer. Do you know anything about data collection?
This is 2014 data which shows that under the PPP massive poverty existed. And why the shock as unskilled and impoverished Guyanese flocked to Saba to do what ever the locals on that island don't want to do. Others flocked to Montserrat, breathing in noxious volcanic fumes.
It takes a truly desperate person to do all of this.
A team can gather this data in 1 week with a proper sampling. Guyana so population so small that this would be a piece of cake. In fact this report is not even needed to come to this conclusion. Any small child in Guyana could have told you the same.
Former Member
Carib is spinning once again for the PNC. This PNC strongman just got paid from his masters so he is back posting.
This chap conned the AFC crowd at GNI and now feeds of the PNC trough while GNI's AFC so called soldiers eat grass.
This is fun to watch.
Former Member
yuji22 posted:Carib is spinning once again for the PNC. This PNC strongman just got paid from his masters so he is back posting.
This chap conned the AFC crowd at GNI and now feeds of the PNC trough while GNI's AFC so called soldiers eat grass.
This is fun to watch.
Ooh rass, this is why he goes missing in action for days on end? When the paycheck short?
Former Member
Drugb posted:yuji22 posted:Carib is spinning once again for the PNC. This PNC strongman just got paid from his masters so he is back posting.
This chap conned the AFC crowd at GNI and now feeds of the PNC trough while GNI's AFC so called soldiers eat grass.
This is fun to watch.
Ooh rass, this is why he goes missing in action for days on end? When the paycheck short?
That is how dem people like dat does operate.
Former Member
Drugb posted:A team can gather this data in 1 week with a proper sampling. Guyana so population so small that this would be a piece of cake. In fact this report is not even needed to come to this conclusion. Any small child in Guyana could have told you the same.
Like I said chatting with you is a waste of my time. You are ignorant.
Any small child can say anything, but like you, they know little.
You don't even know how do to proper statistical sampling. Do you know that the SMALLER the overall data set the MORE difficult sampling is?
You are still to tell me why your PPP took 3 years to release census data if any small child can do it in minutes!
Former Member
Drugb posted:Ooh rass, this is why he goes missing in action for days on end? When the paycheck short?
I actually have productive things to do, and increasingly lack the time or the interest in wallowing in this pig pen called GNI. Its filled with noxious and toxic substances like you.
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:A team can gather this data in 1 week with a proper sampling. Guyana so population so small that this would be a piece of cake. In fact this report is not even needed to come to this conclusion. Any small child in Guyana could have told you the same.
Like I said chatting with you is a waste of my time. You are ignorant.
Any small child can say anything, but like you, they know little.
You don't even know how do to proper statistical sampling. Do you know that the SMALLER the overall data set the MORE difficult sampling is?
You are still to tell me why your PPP took 3 years to release census data if any small child can do it in minutes!
It must be quite an effort to keep supporting this government in the fact of insurmountable evidence of their incompetence.
These folks run the country down and blow out the billions left in the treasury on raises, sport and wine down. Yet you keep your head in the sand and soldier on like all is well.
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:Ooh rass, this is why he goes missing in action for days on end? When the paycheck short?
I actually have productive things to do, and increasingly lack the time or the interest in wallowing in this pig pen called GNI. Its filled with noxious and toxic substances like you.
Prior to PNC ascension to office you had all the time in the world to post, possibly the financing was at the expense of Indians robbed. Now it looks like they shorting you on the paycheck as payment is per post and the economy is bad and treasury empty.
Former Member
Drugb posted:caribny posted:Drugb posted:A team can gather this data in 1 week with a proper sampling. Guyana so population so small that this would be a piece of cake. In fact this report is not even needed to come to this conclusion. Any small child in Guyana could have told you the same.
Like I said chatting with you is a waste of my time. You are ignorant.
Any small child can say anything, but like you, they know little.
You don't even know how do to proper statistical sampling. Do you know that the SMALLER the overall data set the MORE difficult sampling is?
You are still to tell me why your PPP took 3 years to release census data if any small child can do it in minutes!
It must be quite an effort to keep supporting this government in the fact of insurmountable evidence of their incompetence.
These folks run the country down and blow out the billions left in the treasury on raises, sport and wine down. Yet you keep your head in the sand and soldier on like all is well.
No wonder there is a massive decline in posts this year, with many posters either leaving, ore reducing their input.
Druggie if you have nothing intelligent to say, then say nothing. You drag the caliber of GNI into the cesspit with your inane and idiotic brays.
You cannot refute my argument, so just don't respond.
Former Member
Drugb posted:Prior to PNC ascension to office you had all the time in the world to post, possibly the financing was at the expense of Indians robbed. Now it looks like they shorting you on the paycheck as payment is per post and the economy is bad and treasury empty.
Exhibit 1 as to why GNI is dying a slow death. The serious posters have markedly declined in their participation, and I have decided to join them.
Former Member
caribny posted:Drugb posted:caribny posted:Drugb posted:A team can gather this data in 1 week with a proper sampling. Guyana so population so small that this would be a piece of cake. In fact this report is not even needed to come to this conclusion. Any small child in Guyana could have told you the same.
Like I said chatting with you is a waste of my time. You are ignorant.
Any small child can say anything, but like you, they know little.
You don't even know how do to proper statistical sampling. Do you know that the SMALLER the overall data set the MORE difficult sampling is?
You are still to tell me why your PPP took 3 years to release census data if any small child can do it in minutes!
It must be quite an effort to keep supporting this government in the fact of insurmountable evidence of their incompetence.
These folks run the country down and blow out the billions left in the treasury on raises, sport and wine down. Yet you keep your head in the sand and soldier on like all is well.
No wonder there is a massive decline in posts this year, with many posters either leaving, ore reducing their input.
Druggie if you have nothing intelligent to say, then say nothing. You drag the caliber of GNI into the cesspit with your inane and idiotic brays.
You cannot refute my argument, so just don't respond.
They are ashamed to defend massive corruption perpetrated upon the Guyanese people by your crooked, lying and corrupted PNC. They gone into hiding. Check under their beds.
Add Reply
90 online (0 members
/
90 guests)