Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

GEA sacks six more staff members

April 27, 2013 | By | Filed Under News 

 

By Latoya Giles Six staff members from the Guyana Energy Agency have been fired after they reportedly failed lie detector tests which were taken several weeks ago. They include Hollyann France, Nksi Dalgetty, Hillon Chester, Jenelle Noble and Nikeshia Gordon, This newspaper was told that most of the staffers are stationed in Georgetown while one is from Linden. This newspaper was told that the six staffers were called in to a meeting yesterday morning at the Agency’s Quamina Street location. At that meeting, they were told that their services were no longer required because they failed the polygraph tests that they were subjected to.

Some of the dismissed staffers yesterday.

One of the dismissed employees, 20-year-old Jenelle Noble, said she is still shocked over her firing. The young woman said that she worked at the GEA for just over two years and in those years she never had any disciplinary issue with the agency and there was no complaint against her or the way she did her job. She said she agreed to submit herself to the polygraph tests when the agency told her that she needed to complete it. Still in shock, Noble said she could not believe that she would be fired over the lie detector tests since according to her she answered all of the questions truthfully. The former Inspector said that the questions asked during the polygraph tests were not specific and had nothing to do with her job or the agency. “The questions were all very general and unrelated to my job,” she said. France told Kaieteur News that the Chief Executive Officer, Mahendra Sharma, called each of the dismissed staff members for a meeting, individually, yesterday. She said that she was told that she was being dismissed because she had failed a lie detector test. France said that the questions asked by the administrator for the test had nothing to do with the job. Another staffer Nksi Dalgetty, told Kaieteur News that she does not understand why she was fired. The ethnic composition of those dismissed did not escape the notice of commentators on the issue. Just a few weeks ago, a number of other GEA employees were fired after they refused to subject themselves to the voluntary tests. One of those dismissed is contemplating legal action since he said that he does not understand how he could have been fired for failing to undergo a test that was voluntary. The Guyana Energy Agency has been very tight-lipped on the issue. The Guyana Public Service Union (GPSU) had lashed out at the GEA stating that the seniors in the organizations should lead by example and subject themselves to lie detector tests. The GPSU from the inception had denounced polygraph testing as a method of maintaining worker integrity. GPSU Head, Patrick Yarde, had stated that the union is going to stick by workers because they firmly disbelieve in the use of polygraph testing. They also claimed bias in its application. Yarde noted that the test is not foolproof and it’s an abuse of workers’ rights. It shows “bullyism” since these workers are not obligated to take the test.” Yarde asserted that the test is supposed to be voluntary but according to the reports, workers are forced to sign forms saying that they volunteer to be tested.  Polygraph testing cannot be forced on a worker especially when it was not an option to satisfy job application, he added. It is further discriminating, Yarde charged, when the test is not applied to everyone. In a previous interview, Yarde had stated that the test was being used more opportunistically to expel unfavoured employees and not because employees are corrupt. He told this newspaper that to ensure integrity, testing must come from the top all the way down and those found guilty should immediately face the justice system.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

Some of the dismissed staffers yesterday.

 

THIS, according to Freedom House, is the face of crime and corruption in today's Guyana . . . to be rooted out by means illegal if necessary

 

Fip, Babby, Gerry, de NCN bais, PPP drug traffickers, rent-seeking ministers, sundry PPP contractor bandits and contract killers dem toast dis "aggressive action" against corruption with lil bush rum . . . nuff back slapping and hearty chuckling seen and heard

FM
Originally Posted by redux:

 

 

One of the dismissed employees, 20-year-old Jenelle Noble, said she is stil

Some of the dismissed staffers yesterday.

 

France told Kaieteur News that the Chief Executive Officer, Mahendra Sharma, called each of the dismissed staff members for a meeting, individually, yesterday.

 


It is crystal clear that Chief Executive officer Mahendra Sharma was abusing his power.

 

It is grossly unfair to take jobs from those young black kids----the Rev recommends that Mahendra Sharma be fired.

 

THOSE YOUNG PEOPLE MUST GET THEIR JOBS BACK!

 

Rev

FM
Originally Posted by Rev

. . .

Rev

dude, your stench precedes u; don't pollute . . .

 

look, i know there are other threads better suited for working out your self-esteem issues, peddling race pornography . . . and the other stuff

 

no?

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

This is a serious abuse of workers’ rights. Lie Detector tests are not reliable.

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

FM

you ppp ******* that live in north america and post shit on this site let me tell you some hard truth their is some young indians that work at customs that own 2 and 3 cars in every government department these young indians work they have more than what they work for how come the lie detector is not working for them guyana is a f--uck up country under this racist ppp government

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:

you ppp ******* that live in north america and post shit on this site let me tell you some hard truth their is some young indians that work at customs that own 2 and 3 cars in every government department these young indians work they have more than what they work for how come the lie detector is not working for them guyana is a f--uck up country under this racist ppp government

Then they should also be put through lie detector and account for their wealth.  If that was the argument, I have no issue.  But don't dismiss it just because a few Afros failed.  As I said, I would make it standard across the board for certain jobs and this, along with other factors, should determine if someone is fit to be in a certain position.

FM

you perfectly right it should be for all but in guyana this is not the case why i know for sure i bride customs indians and blacks so how come its not showing up for indians  

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:

you perfectly right it should be for all but in guyana this is not the case why i know for sure i bride customs indians and blacks so how come its not showing up for indians  

I doubt someone just selected out Afros from the staff for testing.  However, to allay fears of discrimination, an independent firm should conduct it on a routine basis by a randomize selection process.  These are tools widely available.  A lie detector should only be one in the arsenal, there should be other checks.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

FM

"The Guyana Public Service Union (GPSU) had lashed out at the GEA stating that the seniors in the organizations should lead by example and subject themselves to lie detector tests. "

 

 

 

Until this is done, no one should be penalized.

cain
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

This is a serious abuse of workers’ rights. Lie Detector tests are not reliable.

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

The sole use of lie detector as an instrument of fact checking to penalize ( ie fire ) anyone is illegal in the US so take your tale somewhere else.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

so . . . since you know all this, WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES like a cheap GT prostitute?!!

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

Making a living

 

Baseman you are jack ass. Keep on braying. None of the above ralates to Guyana laws governing the administering of the polygraph testing.

 

Keep on braying kakahole.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests


You are REALLY DUMB. It is not a question , it is a statement of FACT!!!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

You are REALLY DUMB. It is not a question , it is a statement of FACT!!!

huh?

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests


You are REALLY DUMB. It is not a question , it is a statement of FACT!!!

 Sometimes I wonder if you belong to a different specie!!!!

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

Making a living

 

Baseman you are jack ass. Keep on braying. None of the above ralates to Guyana laws governing the administering of the polygraph testing.

 

Keep on braying kakahole.

Jackass, we did reference practices in the USA, that's is how the US came in.  As I said before, your mouth and kalahole are one in the same.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

so . . . since you know all this, WHY ARE YOU POSTING LIES like a cheap GT prostitute?!!

Where is the lie?

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:

Where is the lie?

rite here in bold:

 

[baseman:] "The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases . . ."

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

Where is the lie?

rite here in bold:

 

[baseman:] "The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases . . ."

Wasn't the Atlanta child murder successfully prosecuted?  The failure of the lie detector was a major component of the police case, not the only.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

Where is the lie?

rite here in bold:

 

[baseman:] "The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases . . ."

Wasn't the Atlanta child murder successfully prosecuted?  The failure of the lie detector was a major component of the police case, not the only.

absolute nonsense!

 

yes, Wayne Williams failed a couple of polygraph tests which focused the attention of the FBI on his alibi and activities . . .

 

the polygraph stuff IS NOT admissible in court . . . u CANNOT present that to a jury . . .

 

it is/was NOT part of the prosecution's case against Williams!!

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases.  You are a shameless katahar to excuse it away.  On the other hand, one must ensure that it is professionally and properly administered.

more vacuous bleating from mr ignoramus . . . perhaps you should flesh out the "certain employment screening" part for us, and then explain what "criminal cases" in the USA are prosecuted based on lie detector tests

Lie detectors are one in the arsenal of law enforcement.  It is a "marker" but not the solution.  In even of suspect fraud, etc, a lie detector could be useful in focusing the investigation.

 

Authorities investigating the murder of Yale graduate student Annie Le have focused their efforts on a suspect who failed a lie detector test, sources told ABC News.  Lie detector was also used to help solve the Atlanta child murder case in the 80s.

 

With regards to employment, the rules are as follows;

 

The EPPA prohibits most private employers from using lie detector tests, either for pre‑employment screening or during the course of employment. Employers generally may not require or request any employee or job applicant to take a lie detector test, or discharge, discipline, or discriminate against an employee or job applicant for refusing to take a test or for exercising other rights under the Act.

 

Employers may not use or inquire about the results of a lie detector test or discharge or discriminate against an employee or job applicant on the basis of the results of a test, or for filing a complaint or for participating in a proceeding under the Act.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act permits polygraph (a type of lie detector) tests to be administered to certain job applicants of security service firms (armored car, alarm, and guard) and of pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and dispensers.

 

Subject to restrictions, the Act also permits polygraph testing of certain employees of private firms who are reasonably suspected of involvement in a workplace incident (theft, embezzlement, etc.) that resulted in specific economic loss or injury to the employer.

 

Where polygraph examinations are allowed, they are subject to strict standards for the conduct of the test, including the pretest, testing, and post‑testing phases. An examiner must be licensed and bonded or have professional liability coverage. The Act strictly limits the disclosure of information obtained during a polygraph test.

Making a living

 

Baseman you are jack ass. Keep on braying. None of the above ralates to Guyana laws governing the administering of the polygraph testing.

 

Keep on braying kakahole.

Jackass, we did reference practices in the USA, that's is how the US came in.  As I said before, your mouth and kalahole are one in the same.

Baseman you are kakahole. Tell me what you don't understand.

Mitwah

how are these six young people who have been stigmatized in such a profound way find future employment in the land of their birth?

 

even the criminal accused with recourse to an evidence based trial can clear his name and reputation by proving innocence in court . . . those losing their jobs here are @ the mercy of the PPP mafia

 

this is a human rights issue

FM

A civil liberties issue here for sure, where is Ramjattan, Trotman and the other brilliant minds in the opposition, they need to step up and bring a lawsuit.  A golden opportunity to steal some votes from the PNC.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

Where is the lie?

rite here in bold:

 

[baseman:] "The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases . . ."

Wasn't the Atlanta child murder successfully prosecuted?  The failure of the lie detector was a major component of the police case, not the only.

absolute nonsense!

 

yes, Wayne Williams failed a couple of polygraph tests which focused the attention of the FBI on his alibi and activities . . .

 

the polygraph stuff IS NOT admissible in court . . . u CANNOT present that to a jury . . .

 

it is/was NOT part of the prosecution's case against Williams!!

Baseman is truly a door knob.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by redux:

how are these six young people who have been stigmatized in such a profound way find future employment in the land of their birth?

 

even the criminal accused with recourse to an evidence based trial can clear his name and reputation by proving innocence in court . . . those losing their jobs here are @ the mercy of the PPP mafia

 

this is a human rights issue

I agree that there should be due process.  A lie detector should be only one of a set of measures but not the only.  I don't agree with the lie detector being the decisive tool.  I hope these people and afforded due process.  Furthermore, there are many civil service workers living what seems way beyond their means and that should be called into question.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:

. . . Furthermore, there are many civil service workers [top PPP men & ministers, no?] living what seems way beyond their means and that should be called into question.

what a craven-ass coward u are - see my comments in strikeout/bold/color

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

. . . Furthermore, there are many civil service workers [top PPP men & ministers, no?] living what seems way beyond their means and that should be called into question.

what a craven-ass coward u are - see my comments in strikeout/bold/color

Ah hear you used to tek Bribe in Guyana.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by baseman:

Where is the lie?

rite here in bold:

 

[baseman:] "The most litigious nation, the USA, uses lie detector for certain employment screening and in prosecution of criminal cases . . ."

Wasn't the Atlanta child murder successfully prosecuted?  The failure of the lie detector was a major component of the police case, not the only.

absolute nonsense!

 

yes, Wayne Williams failed a couple of polygraph tests which focused the attention of the FBI on his alibi and activities . . .

 

the polygraph stuff IS NOT admissible in court . . . u CANNOT present that to a jury . . .

 

it is/was NOT part of the prosecution's case against Williams!!

Baseman is truly a door knob.

You seem infactuated with door knobs

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×