Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Stinger you do not know how close some posters came to having a lawsuit against them.  Your computer location and possible identity may be uncovered by the law courts in a lawsuit to the owners of the board.  Then the lawsuits against the various individual slandering posters will start.  So instead of cursing me and Amral you should instead thank us for saving you a bundle of $us  

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

Then delete those posts that were deemed slanderlous, not the entire thread. there were other posters who expressed genuine concerns.

Sheik101
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i hope he do have HIV LET THEM DIE quick so they will not be a burden on the tax payers the guyanese already suffering because of these human now they have to pay for his expensive medical bill let him go at the GT HOSPITAL AND LIE UNDER THE BED 

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

I suggest that you start reading about the recent internet slander cases.  Almost all of the posters on this board are in ABC countries where their computer locations can be traced by court order and legal action taken against them.

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

I suggest that you start reading about the recent internet slander cases.  Almost all of the posters on this board are in ABC countries where their computer locations can be traced by court order and legal action taken against them.

oh shit the people of guyana is too scare  fight for what is right now you saying we from the ABC COUNTRY MUST BE SCARE to express our self i think they will have to come and take away my computer

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

I suggest that you start reading about the recent internet slander cases.  Almost all of the posters on this board are in ABC countries where their computer locations can be traced by court order and legal action taken against them.

It is not slander to speculate. The man had a fake wife. She said he put her out of his bedroom. She is no ugly woman but a hottie. Why? Likely answer is he is gay or bi or just peculiar. Speculating he has HIV is not different than speculating that he may have swine flue or malaria or the hanta virus. That is what the doctors will do.

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by Wally:

Warrior I am not saying that you should not express your views but do it in a way that does not libel/slander anyone and also does not bring legal problems for the board

you are right but i can never remember slandering any one on this board i will openly state my feelings without caring who vex but i will not slander 

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Warrior I am not saying that you should not express your views but do it in a way that does not libel/slander anyone and also does not bring legal problems for the board

you are right but i can never remember slandering any one on this board i will openly state my feelings without caring who vex but i will not slander 

Warrior I never saw you slander anyone but there are some people here who take it to the extreme.

FM
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

I suggest that you start reading about the recent internet slander cases.  Almost all of the posters on this board are in ABC countries where their computer locations can be traced by court order and legal action taken against them.

It is not slander to speculate. The man had a fake wife. She said he put her out of his bedroom. She is no ugly woman but a hottie. Why? Likely answer is he is gay or bi or just peculiar. Speculating he has HIV is not different than speculating that he may have swine flue or malaria or the hanta virus. That is what the doctors will do.

 

 

Danyael there is two sides to every story when it comes to marriage.

 

With regards to HIV.  The illness comes with sexual stigma unlike those other illnesses that you mention.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Wally:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Wally:

Some posters were trying to imply that the man may have HIV.  Which may be interpeted in a court of law as being of a slanderous nature because of the stigma associated with the illness in certain parts of the world.

i suggest u revisit what is actionable in the real world as slander/libel . . . especially for a public figure

I suggest that you start reading about the recent internet slander cases.  Almost all of the posters on this board are in ABC countries where their computer locations can be traced by court order and legal action taken against them.

It is not slander to speculate. The man had a fake wife. She said he put her out of his bedroom. She is no ugly woman but a hottie. Why? Likely answer is he is gay or bi or just peculiar. Speculating he has HIV is not different than speculating that he may have swine flue or malaria or the hanta virus. That is what the doctors will do.

 

 

Danyael there is two sides to every story when it comes to marriage.

 

With regards to HIV.  The illness comes with sexual stigma unlike those other illnesses that you mention.

I would embrace any HIV patient, not that creep. His disease is is worse.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×