Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

 

Will APNU eventually vote for Anti-

Money Laundering law? Western

diplomats warn of "serious

consequences"

  • Friday, 07 February 2014 15:23

Parliament Building

Parliament Building

 

 

Hours after Opposition Leader, David Granger said his coalition would act in the “national interest,” key Western Nations on Friday warned that Guyana could face “serious consequences” if Guyana was blacklisted by the France-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

“We encourage all stakeholders to work together to finalize AML/CFT (Anti Money Laundering and Countering of Financing Terrorism) legislation and ensure its effective implementation in order to prevent and combat money laundering and terrorist financing, as well as to avoid the serious consequences that would arise from black-listing by the FATF,” said the top American, British, Canadian and European Union (EU) envoys here.

Government and the Private Sector Commission (PSC) have repeatedly urged the opposition to support the amendments and avert blacklisting that could significantly impact on incoming and outgoing transfers for fuel, pharmaceutical and other supplies if goods and services. The Chief Executive Officer of Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry, John Tracey has already said that with the regional blacklisting by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) correspondent banks have in some instances been asking for additional information

The statement was issued by D. Brent Hardt, Ambassador of the United States of America;  Andrew Ayre, High Commissioner of the United Kingdom;  Nicole Giles, High Commissioner of Canada and Robert Kopecky, Ambassador of the European Union.

The diplomats’ statement came shortly after a late Friday morning news conference by the Opposition Leader who said that his 26-seat A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) would consider voting in favour of amendments to the AML/CFT if the bill is fixed to its satisfaction.

While Granger has vowed not to vote for government-piloted Bills unless the President signs into law several opposition-approved Bills, he Friday signaled that APNU could vote for the AML/CFT  “We will vote if we feel the outcome is in the national interest,” when asked if his party would vote ‘yes’ if it was satisfied that government was taking steps to ensure that opposition-approved Bills are eventually assented by the President.

He stressed that much depended on whether President Donald Ramotar gives a commitment that he would assent to those bills if they are debated in the House and passed by a two-thirds support.

Asked specifically whether his coalition’s support for the AML/CFT Amendment Bill would be tied to the assent of the opposition bills that have been passed by the House, Granger said “Well, it would include what we chose to include,” he said. “When it comes to the floor of the National Assembly, the popular vote will determine the outcome,” he said. Granger said he was unprepared to say whether APNU was prepared to miss the deadline of mid-February at which time FATF would meet to decide the country’s fate.

Asked why APNU did not participate in recent sittings of the parliamentary select committee to consider amendments to the AML/CFT Act, he said that was due to parliamentary travel duties by his party’s “principal advisers” Carl Greenidge and Jaipaul Sharma.

Granger could not immediately provide details about the changes that APNU would like to see made to the Bill but said there were concerns about “enormous enforcement powers in the hands” of the Finance Minister rather than law enforcement agencies. They could include violation of human rights through searches on persons and their families.

The Western Diplomats welcomed the willingness demonstrated by all parties to move Guyana toward compliance with international Anti Money Laundering/Combatting the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) standards, including updated legislation and enhanced investigative capacity.

They noted that they have  with all stakeholders, including those from government, opposition, civil society, and the private sector on many occasions since 2012.  

“Our  governments are, and will continue to be, actively engaged to support effective implementation of AML/CFT legislation and prosecution of money launderers and financers of terrorism,” they said.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

My sources tell me that part of the delay is due to the fact that some criminal elements in Guyana first want their illegal monetary funds to first be secured. A lot of money movements to foreign destinations has been observed. Once the bill is signed that loophole will be closed. Bharat for instance is worried about his cash transfers to India.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by asj:

There is a strong belief that APNU will sign the (Anti Money Laundering and Countering of Financing Terrorism) legislation

There is still an 'if' coming in to play and that is a big IF 

FM
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

My sources tell me that part of the delay is due to the fact that some criminal elements in Guyana first want their illegal monetary funds to first be secured. A lot of money movements to foreign destinations has been observed. Once the bill is signed that loophole will be closed. Bharat for instance is worried about his cash transfers to India.

Your source happens to be the hot air you just emitted.

Nehru
Originally Posted by asj:

There is a strong belief that APNU will sign the (Anti Money Laundering and Countering of Financing Terrorism) legislation

I hope they do sign the legislation since they're under pressure by the PSC. However, I'll keep my fingers crossed since they're good at surprises. I think this is a game between APNU/PPP to bargain on something. I've said it before, you have to give some to gain some. I call that compromise.

FM

The people's interest should have been above politics, but it's not always the case. If that was the case, this long overdue legislation would have been passed already. We keep hearing the blame game and we don't know who is telling the truth. PPP blaming APNU. and APNU blaming the PPP.

FM

I sense that as a delaying tactic. They have done such things before. Basil William try to use that as a logical explanation to justify their position, but people don't buy into childish game when it comes to serious business.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The interest of the Guyanese populace should always be placed above partisan politics.

Which is why the PPP should stop acting like a dictatorship.  The people who represent the majority of the voters (APNU and the AFC when they vote together) have certain bills which Ramotar is holding up.  It is not unedxpected that when a minority gov't plays silly games by attempting to hold up bills, the majority group will then hold up legislation.

 

The onus is as mcuh on the PPP as it is on the APNU and the AFC to stop acting like kids and have discussions.  If a majority in parliament votes a certain way, unless a 2/3 vote is needed to either over ride a veto, or to have the bill pass, then it should be enacted as law, Not subject to the president attempting to defy the opposition by refusing to sign.

 

Why does the PPP insist that it can over ride the wishes of the population.  This is why many voted for APNU or the AFC even though they knew that neither party could win.  They wanted to force the PPP to enmter into SERIOUS dialogue, instead of acting high handedly.  The PPP do not have a mandate to do anything, unless they get at least one opposition party to support them.

FM

Gov’t proposed AML Bill puts too much

power in the hands of Ministers –

 Granger

Gov’t proposed AML Bill puts too much power in the hands of Ministers – Granger

07/02/2014, by , in latest news

By Fareeza Haniff

 

Leader of the APNU, David Granger. [iNews' Photo]

Leader of the APNU, David Granger. [iNews' Photo]

 
[www.inewsguyana.com] Will A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) support a “clean” version of the Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Amendment Bill if it is presented in the National Assembly on February 10?

 

The answer to this question will be revealed on the floor of the National Assembly, as Leader of the APNU David Granger could not give reporters a direct ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer during a press conference on Friday, February 7.

Instead, Granger explained that the APNU is working at the committee level to ensure that the Bill is “cleaned up” to the satisfaction of the Party.

The APNU Leader also could not say if the committee will finish its deliberations in time to meet the proposed deadline for a review of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) sometime next week.

Granger is adamant that President Donald Ramotar should respect and assent to Bills which were presented and passed in the National Assembly by the APNU and only if this is done, then the APNU will support ‘certain’ legislation presented by the government side of the House.

When asked if this includes the Anti Money Laundering Amendment Bill, Granger said, “Well it will include what we want it to include.”

Meanwhile, in shedding some light on what exactly the APNU is ‘cleaning up’ in the Bill, Granger explained that the draft Bill by the government puts too much power in the hands of the Legal Affairs and Finance Ministers, who has the authority to order that someone be arrested.

“The Minister can have you arrested; the Minister can have your house searched. Some of them are outrageous, that’s why we’re taking this amount of time and going through it with a fine tooth comb. It’s not only you, you’re family, people related to you. People are exposed because of some of the provisions. We have to be very careful with how we go ahead,” the APNU Leader said.

He further noted that the APNU is only interested in ensuring that the people of Guyana are protected against draconian legislation which could harm their human rights.

FM

Granger is adamant that President Donald Ramotar should respect and assent to Bills which were presented and passed in the National Assembly by the APNU and only if this is done, then the APNU will support ‘certain’ legislation presented by the government side of the House

 

THese Vultures don't care about the Welfare of the Guyanese People or they are too DUMB to understand that the ENTIRE Economy is at RISK. But why am I not surprise.

Nehru

Granger is correct in questioning some of the proposals in the bill. What business is it of a minister to order the arrest of someone and his/her family? That is for the police to decide. Ministerial posts are there for running the country, not arresting opposition members one does not like.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Granger is adamant that President Donald Ramotar should respect and assent to Bills which were presented and passed in the National Assembly by the APNU and only if this is done, then the APNU will support ‘certain’ legislation presented by the government side of the House

 

THese Vultures don't care about the Welfare of the Guyanese People or they are too DUMB to understand that the ENTIRE Economy is at RISK. But why am I not surprise.

Fuh once yuh get it right....all these crooks care about is thiefing and building mansion in Pradoville 1 and 2....

sachin_05
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The fact that APNU objected to the PSC for being present at the AML bill special select committee, speaks volume of their sinister motives.


I do not think so, as there is no sinister motives, as PPP/C is happy that their supporters had enough time to finalised all their blood money, they are glad in a sense that the bill was not signed. APNU regards the PSC as another mouthpiece for the Corrupt PPP/C hence they would not listen to anything that the PSC put foward.

FM

There are sinister motives by the PPP to have a minister dictate who gets arrested. The PPP is trying to introduce a dictatorship. What next? Public execution of opposition leaders?

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

There are sinister motives by the PPP to have a minister dictate who gets arrested. The PPP is trying to introduce a dictatorship. What next? Public execution of opposition leaders?

 

The Opposition needs to just trigger new elections and then refuse to participate in said elections until there are electoral reforms.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

The joint opposition delaying tactics are swiftly running out, its time they put their shoulder to the wheel and support the Anti-money laundering bills.

 

Do you even bother reading the threads here?

FM

The current anti money laundering bill proposed by the PPP puts a lot of emphasis on transparency avoidance. The constant posts from the luikes of conscience and albert only underlines the fact that something fishy is going on. APNU would do well not to get involved in signing this bill.

Mr.T

A wide cross section of Guyanese, even the persons who once supported the joint opposition would be bitterly upset, if the joint opposition withhold their support for the anti-money laundering bill.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

A wide cross section of Guyanese, even the persons who once supported the joint opposition would be bitterly upset, if the joint opposition withhold their support for the anti-money laundering bill.

 

 

I remain convinced that Granja will roll over because of the deal done by VULGA Lawrence with the PPP.  The PNC is a direct beneficiary of the PPP today - FINANCIALLY.

 

All awee a wan family!  Is only the idiots in Buxton and Anandale not aware of that fact.  Where there is common interest ( BILLIONS$$$$$), there is a common outcome.

 

Granja will cause no Public Procurement Commission, No local Government elections and a full passage of the anti-money laundering bill.

FM

Bharat bought out Corbin. Ramotar is a bit more honest and has not offered Granger any money to rubber stamp the deal. But the PPP are keeping the door to the safe open in order to temp Granger.

Mr.T

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×