Many are claiming that Barr's lips are printed on Trump's ass forever, the very way you would brand a cow!!!!!!! Your thoughts.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Ow Nehru Bhai, na seh suh.
Mueller came up empty handed. Dems will have a tough time beating Trump especially if The Grabber Biden runs.
CNN hyped this whole thing up and itβs now like buss balls for dem.
BARR gives everyone a huge BAR as he bars dumb_dee_dumbDumbnald from all to see/know the issues.
That report has many leads for Congress to enable them to nail that SOB. Giddy Yap pony, Giddyyap.
Would be nice to see Trump in orange jump suit saying it's the best material...and the cell cot...yep, the best ever.
Just finished reading the published Mueller Report; with has many parts blacked out.
Matter will unfold in the US_of_A Legislature - House of Representatives and Senate plus other avenues.
Some parts of the report ....
Report on the Investigations Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election
One of the Conclusion -- Page 182
IV. CONCLUSION Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President' s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
One Part - Appendix C -- Page C-2
Recognizing that the President would not be interviewed voluntarily, we considered whether to issue a subpoena for his testimony. We viewed the written answers to be inadequate. But at that point, our investigation had made significant progress and had produced substantial evidence for our report. We thus weighed the costs of potentially lengthy constitutional litigation, with resulting delay in finishing our investigation, against the anticipated benefits for our investigation and report. As explained in Volume II, Section H.B., we determined that the substantial quantity of information we had obtained from other sources allowed us to draw relevant factual conclusions on intent and credibility, which are often inferred from circumstantial evidence and assessed without direct testimony from the subject of the investigation.