Skip to main content

World Bank declined to participate in Amaila Hydro Project

August 26, 2013 | By | Filed Under News 

 

 

Without the Amaila Falls Hydro Electric Plant, Government is now saying that electricity charges will have to be increased by as much as 30 per cent.
This was the disclosure by Prime Minister Samuel Hinds, who along with Winston Brassington, yesterday appeared in a televised interview and said too that in order to be ready to receive power from the Hydro Project, Guyana Power and Light (GPL) would need an additional US$90M.
Both Brassington and Prime Minister Hinds also defended the structure of the project, which sees financing costs of US$320M, and describes the deal “as the best one.”
Former Auditor General, Anand Goolsarran, among other critics had lambasted government over the financing structure for the Amaila Falls Hydro Electric Project.
According to Prime Minister Hinds, “those gentlemen cannot put a better arrangement on the table.”
“We have a project that is about the best that could be obtained in the world at present time.”
As is currently structured, the Amaila Falls Hydro Electric project is being built with 70 per cent of the price tag coming in the form of loans.
The remaining 30 per cent of the price tag for the Amaila Hydro Project comes through direct investment.
Brassington, who played a key role in negotiating the project, said that had it been reversed and the investment share in the project been 70 per cent and the debt 30 per cent, then this would have in fact made the project even more expensive.
“In project financing, the structure we have is regular,” according to Brassington.
Former Auditor General, Goolsarran, had suggested that the Government reduce the levels of debt to project and increase the investment equity.
The televised interview was sponsored by the National Industrial and Commercial Investments Limited (NICIL) and moderated by Grantley Waldron.
He sought to find out from Brassington also, why it is that the World Bank was not a part of the project to which the NICIL boss declined an answer, saying he can’t share the reason.
He said that Sithe Global the project developer is a private company and it was that company that made the overture to the World Bank when it declined to participate in the Amaila Falls Hydro Electric Project.
Pressed to reveal the reasons behind the non participation of the World Bank, Brassington responded by saying, “if it was public information why didn’t the World Bank release it.”
In defending the US858M price tag for the project, Brassington maintained it is not too high and spoke of international competitive tendering in 2009 among other aspects.
Turning their attention to the matter of GPL, Prime Minister Hinds said that projections for GPL reduced tariff is also based on the premise that the power company will reduce its technical and commercial losses by seven per cent, by the time the hydro project comes online in 2017

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by TI:

I am curious. Did anyone contact the WB and find out why they declined to aid Guyana on this project?

Interesting question, to which, TI .. there is possibly no answer.

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

I am curious. Did anyone contact the WB and find out why they declined to aid Guyana on this project?

 

What we do know is there was a big quarrel between the Minister of Finance/Jagdeo and the WB. The reps of the WB then packed up and left for Trinidad. 

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TI:

I am curious. Did anyone contact the WB and find out why they declined to aid Guyana on this project?

Interesting question, to which, TI .. there is possibly no answer.


WB is very familiar with Guyana.  They have an answer which no doubt was disclosed to the govt.  Its the govt which declines to inform the public of the reasons for this.

 

And indeed we now read that much of the project will be funded by loans, but yet Ramotar claims that Guyana will not be indebted in connection with this project.  Even if these are projects loans, nost likely there will be loan guarantees demanded by lenders if the project cannot repay the loan.

 

 

Just because Guyana has a need for a hydro electricity projects doesnt mean that a poorly conceived one should be rammed down, potentially obligating Guyana to tremendous debts and a project which cannot generate revenues for to cover debt service.

 

The PPP needs to learn that transparency is key and that they should cease to feel that they are the only people with good ideas.

 

I am also curious about where Guyana was going to fund the debt component, given that historically it has been dependent on funding provided by international agencies and donor nations.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×