Skip to main content

[www.inewsguyana.com] – The Private Sector in Guyana has come out against any unilateral move by the next government to reduce the toll of the Berbice Bridge Company.

This is according to President of the Guyana Manufacturing & Services Association, Clinton Williams who was at the time part of a panel discussion on Hard Talk aired on 90.1 Love FM on Sunday, April 12.

Williams does not seem convinced by the Opposition Coalition’s promise that if it becomes the next Government following the upcoming May 11, general and regional elections it will cut the toll by half.

He was almost amused as he spoke of this promise, and made the point that the focus of the Private Sector is more on the manifesto of the Party rather than what is said on the campaign trail. The Coalition is yet to release its manifesto since the APNU is working with the AFC to merge both manifestos into one.

He also made the point that if the Opposition does indeed go in this direction, then Public/ Private Partnership in the future would be in jeopardy.

“No businessman would want to get into business with the Government as a public private partnership if in fact this is going to be the trend.” 

In addition to Williams, the Chairman of the Private Sector Commission (PSC) Ramesh Persaud was also part of the discussion and echoed similar sentiments. the extended part of the Berbice river bridge under construction

“A unilateral decrease in toll by the government or any government will not be received very well by private business, and it’s tantamount to price control and any such unilateral decision, governments need to be very careful of and I believe there are adequate mechanisms in the entire Berbice Bridge deal…that provides for information to be shared between the government and the Board and there are formulas that are in place how such decisions are to be made.” 

While the key players in the sector do not seem to be against the move, Persaud made the point that, “it must be done in unison with the investors.”

The political Opposition has been fighting since it gained its one seat majority following the 2011 elections to lower the toll as calls continue to mount from Berbicians in this regard.

However, government continues to object to this move noting that the bridge is privately controlled and therefore government does not have the authority to lower tolls.  The Opposition’s argument is that the bridge, which was commissioned in December 2008, was built with significant investment by the government of Guyana on behalf of the people and now managed by the BBCI.

Government through its investment arm, the National Industrial and Commercial Investments Ltd is a preferential shareholder and a member of the Board of Directors of the Bridge Company.

Since its commissioning in 2008, the Berbice Bridge has facilitated crossing of over 650,000 vehicles resulting in annual revenue of over $1.5B.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The current system seems fixed to fleece the consumers.  Why did the NIS not get any dividends?

 

This whole deal has to be reexamined and the Coalition needs to tell us how the PPP sold out the people of Berbice.

 

Current tolls are simply unacceptable.

FM

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

is the taxpayer forgoing dividends part of the contract too?

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

is the taxpayer forgoing dividends part of the contract too?

Yes...essentially the taxpayers will foot the bill of other tax payers who cross the bridge and the agreements to other investors, including the retired taxpayers who will be drawing down NIS.

FM

I am sure Nigel will find some illegality in the deal to nullify and and go back to the drawing board.

 

All the details will have to be revealed.

 

They have to explain why govt is not getting dividends.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

is the taxpayer forgoing dividends part of the contract too?

Yes...essentially the taxpayers will foot the bill of other tax payers who cross the bridge and the agreements to other investors, including the retired taxpayers who will be drawing down NIS.

let me get this straight . . . are u are saying that the forgoing of dividends by NICIL/NIS is part of the "contract," and not related to the 'non-profits' generated by the Bridge company?

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

is the taxpayer forgoing dividends part of the contract too?

Yes...essentially the taxpayers will foot the bill of other tax payers who cross the bridge and the agreements to other investors, including the retired taxpayers who will be drawing down NIS.

let me get this straight . . . are u are saying that the forgoing of dividends by NICIL/NIS is part of the "contract," and not related to the 'non-profits' generated by the Bridge company?

I am saying you should not change the contractual obligations. Once election is over your boys in APNU-AFC will need to find out why dividends are not paid.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by TK:

No matter how you dislike the pricing on this bridge, you can't break the contract as it is a terrible signal for future private investors, domestic and foreign. However, the govt will have to subsidize the rate so people can get a lower toll.

is the taxpayer forgoing dividends part of the contract too?

Yes...essentially the taxpayers will foot the bill of other tax payers who cross the bridge and the agreements to other investors, including the retired taxpayers who will be drawing down NIS.

let me get this straight . . . are u are saying that the forgoing of dividends by NICIL/NIS is part of the "contract," and not related to the 'non-profits' generated by the Bridge company?

I am saying you should not change the contractual obligations. Once election is over your boys in APNU-AFC will need to find out why dividends are not paid.

well, first, they are not my "boys" at APNU-AFC . . . i support the interests of ordinary people and proper democratic rule in Guyana

 

second, i did not advocate breaking existing contracts . . . i asked specific questions about those contracts

FM

Of course the private sector would be against anything that stops the gravy train.

 

Some people say that's why the PPP did not regionalize birth certificates, passports, tax documents, vehicle transfers, drivers licenses for Berbice people so they are forced to use the bridge and generate income for the investors.  This is a big betrayal of the Berbice people.

 

Under the OLD PNC, you could get Passports at New Amsterdam.

 

Jagan believed in regionalizing govt services.  PPP does not care about rural people.

 

What was funny, the software used by the GRA was called "Trips."  People said this meant you must make many trips before you get the govt documents. They routinely tell you come back tomorrow, next week, next month... and don't care whether you came from Black Bush, Crabwood Creek, or Pomeroon.  That's how much the PPP love you.  You want 5 more years of that?

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×