Skip to main content

uyana bans 'slanderous' new calypso songs from a

G

irwaves

Reuters 11 hr ago By Neil Marks

share
0
tweet
13
email
 

President Donald Ramotar recognizes that Guyana has a corruption problem, but songs decrying it have been banned from state-run radio.

GEORGETOWN — Calypso lyrics decrying corruption and excess have so irked Guyana's government that new songs from the popular Caribbean music genre have been banned from state airwaves.

Calypso music has long been a proud and central feature of life in Guyana, a laid-back former British colony of just 750,000 people on the northeast shoulder of South America.

But the politically spicy lyrics of some recent songs have been too much for the government. Staff at the government-run National Communications Network, or NCN, received a directive this week prohibiting the broadcast of new calypso songs.

Public Works Minister Robeson Benn was so angry at one tune on NCN radio that he drove down to the station himself "to find out what the hell was going on," an official spokesman said.

"It was slanderous," the minister said afterward. "I hold it as my right to go to the station to intervene in an activity which I think impacted me as a citizen and also as a minister."

One of the calypsos that offended authorities blasts the government's corruption record.

"With all de corruption dat taking place, we is de ones fe [they] blame, while dem a thief, thief, thief," the song, which won a local competition, goes in the local creole language.

"Calypso lyrics are spicy," said the piece's singer, Lester Charles. "Either you laugh your head off or it get you real vex."

President Donald Ramotar recognizes Guyana has a corruption problem but says its scale is exaggerated.

Six-time national calypso champion Geoffrey Phillips, who goes by the stage name of "The Mighty Rebel," described the state media ban as "petty and disgusting."

"Calypsos are the spirit and passion of the people," he said. "If we are being forced to tone down, then calypso would lose its soul."

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The state should not be owning media, this is the crux of the problem.

It is a conflict of interest as those in power would inevitably use it to further their own agenda. 

On the other hand a state owned entity should not be airing any political content. Guyana may call itself a democracy but is it really with all these govt run entities that are contrary to pure democratic principles?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×