Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Anger over South Africa award to Burnham

 

Rickey Singh

Sunday, April 28, 2012, Source


THE recent decision by the South Africa Government to confer on Guyana's late President Forbes Burnham its highest national honour designated for outstanding foreign citizens- — the Oliver Tambo Award (gold) — has drawn strong criticisms from two well-known Jamaican scholars and Pan-Africanists — Dr Rupert Lewis and Dr Horace Campbell.

 

Both have expressed shock and sadness in wondering aloud whether President Jacob Zuma's Administration had in effect posthumously rewarded the former Guyana head of state for the June 13, 1980 assassination of Walter Rodney, the internationally famous Guyanese historian and Pan-Africanist crusader for freedom and justice.


BURNHAM… accused of eliminating political rivals

 

While professors Lewis and Campbell were agonising over this surprising "recognition" by South Africa, Burnham's eldest daughter, Roxanne Van West Charles, was heading a family delegation to South Africa to receive the Oliver Tambo Award, on behalf of her father, at a ceremonial event scheduled for yesterday.

 

Rodney, noted for his widely treasured scholarly examination of How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, was killed in his car from a bomb explosion, subsequently uncovered as the work of an officer of the Guyana Defence Force, Gregory Smith, who was secretly working as an agent of the then Burnham regime.

 

Smith died years later in nearby French Guiana to which he had fled following Rodney's assassination. Despite a long campaign for an independent inquiry, with international support, into the circumstances of Rodney's death, no such action was ever taken.

 

Horace Campbell, author of Reclaiming Zimbabwe (The Exhaustion of the Patriarchal Model of Liberation), and Rupert Lewis, whose seminal work, Walter Rodney's Intellectual and Political Thought, would have had no problems in separately expressing, within days of each other, their grievous disappointment over the Oliver Tambo Award to Burnham.

 

Two historians

 

In a column last week for 1804CaribVoices (Pan-Caribbean Voices for Integration and Social Justice) online, Campbell noted that Oliver Tambo "was unstinting and unrelenting in his opposition to all forms of oppression". Consequently, he firmly declared:

 

"It is my view that the granting of this posthumous award will demean the memory of Oliver Tambo. If there are still progressive forces within the African National Congress (ANC) they should rescind this award so that this (scheduled April 27) ceremony will instead be one that honours the memory of Walter Rodney..."

 

Such a development was virtually impossible to expect. But in his own response that came as this column was being written, Lewis was quite clear in observing:

 

"Anyone who witnessed Forbes Burnham on television gloating about the killing of Walter Rodney by a bomb nearly 30 years ago would be shocked to learn that South Africa is to posthumously reward him with the Oliver Tambo Award...

 

"It is not that Burnham did not contribute to the anti-apartheid cause, but unlike other Caribbean political leaders of the time he eliminated individuals in the political opposition within Guyana. Rodney was the best known of these opposition activists and the most prominent Pan-Africanist in the 1970s..."

 

The historian Lewis further recalled that while at the University of Dar es Salaam (in Tanzania) from 1966 (year of Guyana's independence) until the early 1970s, Rodney "was actively engaged in the debates and educational programmes of several of the Southern African liberation movements, including the ANC".

 

Therefore, in Lewis' reasoning, this posthumous Oliver Tambo Award "can only help to cover up Burnham's assassination of Walter Rodney".

 

It is quite relevant to record the viewpoint of a senior researcher for the South Africa Broadcasting Corporation, Tula Dlamini, who has been following reactions to the award to Burnham, who died on August 6, 1985.

 

As part of his own contribution on 1804CaribVoices in relation to the controversy, Dlamini said that "regardless of the merits or demerits of the positions taken against the award, it is within reason to support those who are calling for a serious debate on this issue...

 

"For example," he contends, "the South Africa Government must explain what rationale is there for the honour to be given to Burnham when it has never been given to Julius Nyerere (Tanzania's first president who died in October 1999).

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by warrior:

giving a award to burham is like saying HITLER was a good man

Why are you making comparison with Hitler to Burnham? Burnham was never like Hitler.

FM

I could understand the SA giving the award. Burnham had a split personality, he was a champion of the rights of the Black oppressed while he was the epitome of the Black oppressor.  The SA's were never exposed to the latter and, as such, it matters not.  This is no different from the sentiments of Afro Guyanese, and they lived and saw it.

FM
NothingOriginally Posted by Ronald Sugrim:

Wonder what Rupert Roopnarine and Clive Thomas saying about all this


Nothing!!!   They are more concerned about looking good in the eyes of a few.

Nehru

The south african government owes us no explanation. Jagdeo originated the present corrupt PPP and all their distasteful after effects that persists and I have not heard Ricky Singh complaining of him being ill deserving of any of the accolades heaped on him.

FM

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Quit your hyperventilating on hyperbolic lies. If burnham is noted for anything it is for being a dictator of the period who was not into blood letting. He oppressed the society equally so. Those who prospered were few and far in between and they include many Indians of the traditional families and many of those still slurp at the PPP trough and have their tentacles deep into prime leech sectors of the society. I did not hear the PPP clamoring agains his action in support for African liberation movements either.

 

I have no authority to approve or disapprove any of the awards. That award is the opinion of the head of a state who had little support for a cause that mattered to them and burnham happen to be among the few in their corner. It was a just view cause and if burnham was a dictator at home they are not recognizing that but his contribution to their vision.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Quit your hyperventilating on hyperbolic lies. If burnham is noted for anything it is for being a dictator of the period who was not into blood letting. He oppressed the society equally so. Those who prospered were few and far in between and they include many Indians of the traditional families and many of those still slurp at the PPP trough and have their tentacles deep into prime leech sectors of the society. I did not hear the PPP clamoring agains his action in support for African liberation movements either.

 

I have no authority to approve or disapprove any of the awards. That award is the opinion of the head of a state who had little support for a cause that mattered to them and burnham happen to be among the few in their corner. It was a just view cause and if burnham was a dictator at home they are not recognizing that but his contribution to their vision.

Then the South Africans are Immoral Beasts!!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

Then the South Africans are Immoral Beasts!!

You are in no position of merit on the moral scale to make that evaluation.

FM

Someone should make a list of all those indians who got super rich under Burnham.  Most are still rich today. Burnham destroyed competition to make them rich.  In return the Guyanese consumer mostly got sh--y products while those bast---ds ship their money overseas.

Prashad
Originally Posted by Prashad:

Someone should make a list of all those indians who got super rich under Burnham.  Most are still rich today. Burnham destroyed competition to make them rich.  In return the Guyanese consumer mostly got sh--y products while those bast---ds ship their money overseas.


And your point is?? What that has to do with the topic????

Nehru
Originally Posted by Prashad:

You young punk. Many indians got super rich under Burnham.  I only can think of one Blackman who got rich under Burnham. Not even Burnham got rich under Burnham.

Lijke I said, please look at the topic again. And it is news to me that burnham did not get Rich. Thanks for the Info.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Observer:

I am tempted to say Odo is laughing from the grave, but the demon was too consumed and burnt to bits in hell's fires to have any muscles left in his face to laugh!      

them Indians but so many malaa on Odo he became an honorary Hindu so he is probably incarnated as a dung beetle. Did not one branch of the maha sabba call him an incarnation of Krishna?

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Burnham practiced apartheid in Guyana. Segregation by intimidation and violence. Burn down the indians' houses if they live in these useless good fu nuttin negra neighborhoods. The Indians had to relocate and leave their homes to these PNC terrorists. 

FM
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Burnham practiced apartheid in Guyana. Segregation by intimidation and violence. Burn down the indians' houses if they live in these useless good fu nuttin negra neighborhoods. The Indians had to relocate and leave their homes to these PNC terrorists. 

Eusi Kwayana knows Nuff Nuff about the burning of Indian Houses.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

The south african government owes us no explanation.

Jagdeo originated the present corrupt PPP and all their distasteful after effects that persists and I have not heard Ricky Singh complaining of him being ill deserving of any of the accolades heaped on him.

 

These fools will not Question Jagdeo for embracing the worst PNC thieves, thugs and Criminals like Norman McClean, Rabbai, Hamilton, Lamumba, Bynoe, Nascimento or McCoy.

 

These fools see nothing wrong with Jagdeo & Ramotar clinging to power with the Kabaka Constitution....

 

But they want an explanation from South Africa.

 

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:

The south african government owes us no explanation. Jagdeo originated the present corrupt PPP and all their distasteful after effects that persists and I have not heard Ricky Singh complaining of him being ill deserving of any of the accolades heaped on him.

Thank you, thank you and Thank you!!!

Mr Ricky Singh won my admiration after he wrote in the Guyana Graphic and the topic read " The shame is greater than the Victory". This was just two days after Burnham rigged the 1973 elections. Subsequently Mr Sinh moved to Barbados because of dictator Burnham and continued to write for Carribean Contact.

 

What is sad is that up to this day Mr Singh has not seen it fit to pen  one  article on the drugs and corruptionh by the PPP.

Chief
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Burnham practiced apartheid in Guyana. Segregation by intimidation and violence. Burn down the indians' houses if they live in these useless good fu nuttin negra neighborhoods. The Indians had to relocate and leave their homes to these PNC terrorists. 

You folks are such profound racists you say all sort of sh.it without thinking. Guyana is geographically intermingled racially but not to the extent we do not still have villages exclusively of one group. Burnham did not create that bantunstanization. Our own internal racist inertia did that. Indians relocated in one area and they were less than 10 percent of wismer at that point. Note the Bantustanization continue with all those new enclaves of Indian schemes build by buddy and RK. You talk too much sh.t

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by skeldon_man:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

While South Africa was fighting apartheid, Burnham was on a mission to exterminate Indo Guyanese from Guyana.

 

This award is insulting and those like Storm who approve of this award has shown their true hidden PNC identity and it is a total insult to all Indo Guyanese who suffered immensely under his dictatorship rule.

Burnham practiced apartheid in Guyana. Segregation by intimidation and violence. Burn down the indians' houses if they live in these useless good fu nuttin negra neighborhoods. The Indians had to relocate and leave their homes to these PNC terrorists. 

Eusi Kwayana knows Nuff Nuff about the burning of Indian Houses.

 Why don't you tell us? I say you are a bloody liar on  the legacy of a man who overall lived a decent life.

FM

If Burnham practiced Apartheid in Guyana, we have to find an explanation for the following:

 

  1. Joe Singh was head of the National Service
  2. Jean-Maitland Singh was head of the Knowledge Sharing Institute (KSI)
  3. Ramphal, Shahab, Steve Narine, Ranji Chandisingh et al all had top government positions.

 

Putting soldiers from different parts of the country in strange ares (for example, Wakenaam had GDF from Linden in 1973 before, during and after that hijacked election), banning yellow split peas and processed wheaten flour were not driven by race necessarily (though there may be some element of that) but sheer stupidity. Slowing down Indian culture was more of an economic (lack of froeign curtrency) impact than race-related.

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:

If Burnham practiced Apartheid in Guyana, we have to find an explanation for the following:

 

  1. Joe Singh was head of the National Service
  2. Jean-Maitland Singh was head of the Knowledge Sharing Institute (KSI)
  3. Ramphal, Shahab, Steve Narine, Ranji Chandisingh et al all had top government positions.

 

Putting soldiers from different parts of the country in strange ares (for example, Wakenaam had GDF from Linden in 1973 before, during and after that hijacked election), banning yellow split peas and processed wheaten flour were not driven by race necessarily (though there may be some element of that) but sheer stupidity. Slowing down Indian culture was more of an economic (lack of froeign curtrency) impact than race-related.

Oh rass, another Burnham supporter like Chief. ahahahaha

FM

Hello chubby mamba member. Maybe them Burnham men used to service you hence your admiration for the man and his army of big bigan guards. 

 

Oh rass you got a cheering section from the peanut gallery. ahahahah

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:

If Burnham practiced Apartheid in Guyana, we have to find an explanation for the following:

 

  1. Joe Singh was head of the National Service
  2. Jean-Maitland Singh was head of the Knowledge Sharing Institute (KSI)
  3. Ramphal, Shahab, Steve Narine, Ranji Chandisingh et al all had top government positions.

 

Putting soldiers from different parts of the country in strange ares (for example, Wakenaam had GDF from Linden in 1973 before, during and after that hijacked election), banning yellow split peas and processed wheaten flour were not driven by race necessarily (though there may be some element of that) but sheer stupidity. Slowing down Indian culture was more of an economic (lack of froeign curtrency) impact than race-related.

These are the 1% for cover while the 99% lived in subjugation.  Hitler used Jews, Apartheid SA had their tokens also.

 

The current lot of katahars feel outdone by the PPP and want to become the new 1% should the dastardly PNC sneak back into power.  They are driven by hatred of the PPP ruling group and are willing to flush the rest of the people into a resurrected PNC abyss.

 

What bunch of crap, save money on dal (good economics) but spend on guns to oppress the masses who are unhappy.  What a shameful comparison.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Kari:

If Burnham practiced Apartheid in Guyana, we have to find an explanation for the following:

 

  1. Joe Singh was head of the National Service
  2. Jean-Maitland Singh was head of the Knowledge Sharing Institute (KSI)
  3. Ramphal, Shahab, Steve Narine, Ranji Chandisingh et al all had top government positions.

 

Putting soldiers from different parts of the country in strange ares (for example, Wakenaam had GDF from Linden in 1973 before, during and after that hijacked election), banning yellow split peas and processed wheaten flour were not driven by race necessarily (though there may be some element of that) but sheer stupidity. Slowing down Indian culture was more of an economic (lack of froeign curtrency) impact than race-related.

These are the 1% for cover while the 99% lived in subjugation.  Hitler used Jews, Apartheid SA had their tokens also.

 

The current lot of katahars feel outdone by the PPP and want to become the new 1% should the dastardly PNC sneak back into power.  They are driven by hatred of the PPP ruling group and are willing to flush the rest of the people into a resurrected PNC abyss.

 

What bunch of crap, save money on dal (good economics) but spend on guns to oppress the masses who are unhappy.  What a shameful comparison.

The PPP are hated because they are crooks. If you hate the PNC Of the past why should we not hate the PPP of the present if ever hate is an applicable word here? There is no shame in comparing evil There is shame in excusing it as you do with the PPP.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×