Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.  Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.

 

 Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

 

Isn't it Retarded to tell AFC & APNC that winning 51% of the Votes should not be their only focus and target on May 11th?

 

Even a Retard should agree ....they would have gone over in detail what they together can bring to the table on May11th ...before signing this alliance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drooling

 

1999: All rights reserved. This site is designed for Internet ...

CaribJ the AFC-APNU Alliance has said all their Leadership & supporters are 100% Behind their approach to remove the Corrupt PPP from office.

 

They also say...they are a  few racist from the Outside..... who will raise all types of issues to breakup the alliance.....they expect them to keep Drooling and going over irrelevant Goat Shit Issues which the parties have already dealt with and moved on.

 

CARIBJ WHAT DO THEY MEAN

BY DROOLING?

 

 

J..... I will get the two spokesmen for the Parties...Mr Trotman & Mr Harmond answer your Concern that AFC & APNU are not happy with the agreement .....

and APNU is not happy  with AFC's Performance

in Indian Areas.....

 

AFC & APNU have Keep  focusing all their attention

on Removing PPP from the day they announced their agreement......

 

But CaribJ keep saying the Black people have Issues

with Nagamootoo, Ramjattan & AFC...

 

J needs some attention.

 

retarded

 

 

 

J what is the Difference between Drooling & Dribbling?

 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

I think Granger is an honorable man who will keep his word.

 

Granger isn't the issue.  The issue is that if the AFC doesn't win at least 20% of the votes obtained by the coalition, and APNU MPs have to give up seats for AFC MPs, who didn't pull their weight in bringing in votes, there will be a feeling within APNU that the AFC got more than they deserve.

 

So it is up to the AFC to prove themselves by ensuring that at least 15-20% of the coalition votes come out of PPP strongholds.  They would have then earned their keep.

 

A coalition implies that BOTH entities pull their weight.  Not one pulling in the votes while the other just shows up to govern.

Was the hilited in the deal?

cain

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×