Skip to main content

Appointment of Canadian Consultant has all the hallmarks of the oil curse – Int’l Lawyer 

…Review of 3rd well plan (Payara)

The recent appointment of former Alberta Premier, Alison Redford to review the field development plan for ExxonMobil’s third oil project, called Payara, has all the hallmarks of the oil curse says international lawyer, Melinda Janki.

International Lawyer, Melinda Janki

Former Alberta Premier, Alison Redford

The transparency advocate’s strong comment comes on the heels of a missive issued by the government on Saturday evening to the effect that Redford, an ex-politician who resigned in 2014 for inappropriately spending Canada’s tax dollars, is leading a team on the review of the Payara plan. The PPP government had also said that Redford was hired thanks to a grant from the Canadian High Commission.
Her team consists of “the former Deputy Minister of Energy in Newfoundland, Canada, senior international reservoir engineers, and Mr. Jay Park, Q.C, Managing Partner of Park Energy Law based in Canada and the United Kingdom.” It is significant to note that the members of Redford’s team were not initially released by the government – this information only became public late Saturday night.
During an interview with Kaieteur News, Janki categorically stated that Guyanese have had enough of secrecy and strange decisions in the petroleum sector. She is of the view that the government must publish the criteria which it used in order to select Redford and her team for this important review. Further, Janki posited that the evaluation of the Payara Field Development Plan should be put on hold until ExxonMobil addresses the ongoing issues with flaring aboard the Liza Destiny vessel.
As a result of mechanical issues with the vessel’s gas compressor system, ExxonMobil has flared over 10 billion cubic feet of gas. On a daily basis, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said it continues to burn between 12 and 15 million cubic feet of gas per day.  Taking this into account, Janki said that ExxonMobil needs to repair the harm it has done to Guyana and apologize publicly to the Guyanese people for polluting its air space with over 250 toxic chemicals on a daily basis.
Apart from this, Janki insisted that the government should have openly advertised for a competent team leader who is versed in the evaluation of field development plans rather than accepting a former politician who was involved in a financial scandal.
Janki said, “This is an extremely bad start for the PPP/C government. It has all the hallmarks of the oil curse—appointments made in secret, a team that has no loyalty to Guyana and apparently lacks the technical skills needed to correct ExxonMobil’s field development  plan, and money from a foreign government (Canada) to insert its people into Guyana’s petroleum sector.”
The international lawyer added, “The review of the Payara Field Development Plan must be put out to tender in accordance with the basic rules of transparency and good governance. If Redford’s team is the best, they’ll still win. If not, they shouldn’t be doing the review.”
Also in agreement with Janki is former Presidential Advisor on Petroleum, Dr. Jan Mangal. Upon noting that Redford was selected to lead the review of the field development plan, Dr. Mangal questioned whether the PPP is trying to compete with the APNU+AFC faction for mismanaging Guyana’s oil industry. Based on her weighty political background, Dr. Mangal said it is clear that Redford’s expertise is not in reviewing such plans. The transparency advocate said, “This is a very sad joke, at the expense of Guyana. Did the PPP not look at Ms Redford’s bio? Do the Canadians take Guyanese for fools? How many field development plans has she reviewed for similar deepwater projects like Payara?  I assume zero until told otherwise. Guyanese need to object to this inappropriate business. This is so disheartening.”

Former Presidential Advisor, Dr. Jan Mangal

Turning his attention to the missive the government released late Saturday evening, Dr. Mangal said that a lot was mentioned about her background in overseeing the energy sector in Alberta and her partnership with the World Bank.
Part of the statement reads, “Ms. Redford has served as a World Bank Advisor on Gas Sector Reform in Pakistan and Afghanistan and in other jurisdictions, as they develop new approaches to upstream regulation, transparency and accountability inclusive of community engagement. As Premier of Alberta, she introduced the Responsible Energy Development Act which created the Alberta Energy Regulator.  The Act sets out rigorous regulation, compliance and enforcement provisions on all aspects of oil and gas production, including permits and licenses.”
Dr. Mangal said readers ought to take note that initially, Vice President, Bharrat Jagdeo had clearly stated that one person was being hired. A subsequent press release from the Ministry of Natural Resources only mentioned one person too.
The latest release which went out on Saturday evening may be damage limitation after the intense reaction and rejection of the government’s chosen consultant, Dr. Mangal stated.
At the  end of the  day, the former Presidential Advisor said  that burning questions about the  haste to complete the review in less than 10 days as well as having it done by a former politician who is haunted by corruption scandals, remain unanswered and should be of grave concern to all Guyanese.
Scandal
Apart from Redford’s apparent inexperience, Kaieteur News’ background check had found that Redford had demitted office in 2014 following a slew of scandals.
In 2013, Redford had attended the funeral of Nelson Mandela while Premier of the Canadian province of Alberta. Her attendance, however, created a controversy when it was revealed that the Alberta government covered the approximately CDN $45,000 cost for her trip, including roughly CDN$10,000 for a privately chartered flight to return to Alberta from South Africa for a swearing-in of the new Alberta Cabinet.
Redford’s travel further elicited disapproval from Albertans when it was revealed that her then 12-year-old daughter and a friend had accompanied her several times on official government planes.
In mid-March 2014, Redford repaid the costs of the Mandela funeral trip and apologized. It was reported in the press that the money was repaid only after weeks of refusals to do so, and Redford “only relented after tensions within her caucus spilled into the public realm.”
The fallout over the Mandela funeral trip had led to further scrutiny, with subsequent revelations of Redford’s expenses to promote the province and questionable spending, while her government was making public service cuts. This led to charges that she was abusing her political power with a culture of entitlement.
On March 19, 2014, Redford announced that she would resign as premier of Alberta, effective March 23, 2014. She was succeeded by deputy premier Dave Hancock, as the interim party leader and premier until Jim Prentice was chosen as a successor at a leadership election, which was the Progressive Conservative Party’s third contest in eight years.
Further to this, Redford had announced her resignation as a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) for Calgary-Elbow on August 6, 2014, one day before an Auditor General’s report into her travel expenses was scheduled for release.
On August 7, 2014, a report by the Auditor General of Alberta noted that as Premier, she and her office had “used public resources inappropriately,” “used public assets (aircraft) for personal and partisan purposes” and that Redford “was involved in a plan to convert public space in a public building into personal living space.”
The report concluded that these abuses arose due to an “aura of power around Premier Redford and her office and the perceptions that the influence of the office should not be questioned.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

THE WRONG CHOICE

Ms. Alison Redford, QC, an ex-premier of Alberta, Canada, is the wrong person to head the expert review of the Payara Field Development Plan (FDP). She lacks the appropriate qualifications and experience in reviewing FDPs.Guyana does not need a political and regulatory lawyer to spearhead such a vital technical review. Ms. Redford’s political record does not instill trust or assure public confidence. Her background raises concerns.Guyana needs the best to undertake the review. It needs persons of unblemished reputations so that no aspersions can be cast on the review process. Guyana must be satisfied that Ms. Redford’s appointment has been endorsed at the highest levels in Ottawa.A team of experts specializing and with experience in conducting such reviews is needed to spearhead this exercise. In the interest of transparency, the public needs to know the identities and credentials of the technical persons who are part of any review. We are therefore concerned about both Ms. Redford’s selection and the silence over the names of her support team.The country can ill-afford another fiasco it its dealings with ExxonMobil. We have been taken advantage of before. The country was deprived of US$55B as a result of the flawed negotiations undertaken by the previous administration.The present review is our last chance to maximize the benefits for our people. If we get it wrong, the present and future generations are doomed to a fate of scratching a living.

Django

Payara review will take account of concerns raised by local agencies – Bharrat

August 17 ,2020

Source

Concerns raised by Guyana’s oversight agencies were among reasons for an expanded examination of plans for ExxonMobil’s proposed third oil well, Payara, and the former premier of Alberta, Canada who is heading up the review had been recommended by the Canadian Government

This was disclosed yesterday by Natural Resources Minister, Vickram Bharrat amid continuing questions about the purpose behind the review of ExxonMobil’s Field Development Plan (FDP) for Payara and whether Canadian Queen’s Counsel, Alison Redford was the appropriate person for this exercise.

Bharrat said that oversight agencies here along with the previously contracted United Kingdom firm Bayphase oil and gas consultants are actively assisting the new team led by Redford. It is unclear how long the review will last and ExxonMobil has raised concerns for some months now that delayed approvals for Payara could cost the country money.

Vickram Bharrat

The Minister said that it was concerns raised by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Department of Energy, such as the impact of reservoir water dumping into the ocean and flaring volumes that are among the issued to be addressed.

“Bayphase was contracted and over the past eight months had been working on a review (of the FDP). There is a misconception that the new team will be doing the entire review. The EPA, the GGMC (Guyana Geology and Mines Commission) and the Department of Energy, these agencies had been contributing…,” the Minister yesterday told Stabroek News.

“What they are doing with Allison and her team is just re-examining the work done by Bayphase …it does not also equate to that when that is done there will be an automatic acceptance and go ahead. It is to guide on what has to be done, what has to be strengthened, tightened, fixed…” he added.

The Minister of Natural Resources explained that the PPP/C government asked for a review of the Payara project because they understand the importance of “getting it right” for Guyana as compared to Exxon’s desired optimal time for a decision.

“Exxon says it is working with a timeline and that is not our fault, that was the (five-month) political impasse. If we were buying  into their position and timeline we would not have asked for an overall review to assess for ourselves,” he said, while stressing the importance of the sector.

Sources close to the decision-making process told Stabroek News that concerns from Guyana’s EPA about both short and long-term effects on the ocean and environment from the Payara project are being addressed.

“As I understand, there are issues about Exxon’s dumping of over 250,000 tonnes of reservoir water into the ocean and then using clean ocean water for reinjection. That does not make sense because the well water is to be used for reinjection. There is no study on the impact and toxicity of this on the ocean and we cannot just go with commitments. We need to see the studies of the effects because this is a different project. The density and technical information and management of the reservoir has to meet international and environmental standards or we will just be left to spend whatever money we got on clean up,” one source asserted.

“There are also issues about flaring (of gas) because you know the situation we are in. We have said that we do not want flaring. And …there has to be legal binding language and clauses that guarantee and clarify what is expected, because the feedback thus far is not good. I also understand that an issue about ocean vibrations and tremors was raised…so there a number of issues,” the source added.

‘Lead role’

This newspaper understands that Director of the EPA Dr. Vincent Adams, who has decades of experience in the public and private sectors in the environmental management, groundwater and petroleum production fields,  and worked on US$ billion dollars projects at the United Stated Department of Energy, where he had served for some 30 years, is playing a “lead role”.

Adams holds a PhD in Environmental Engineering, MSc Degrees in Groundwater Hydrology and Geological Engineering/Petroleum Engineering, and a BSc in Civil Engineering. “We have Dr. Adams there and he knows what this is about and what is needed to be done in the best interest of this country and are confident he will assist,” one source said.

Questioned on why Adams was not then appointed the lead reviewer, the source said that it was a Canadian grant and  Redford was identified by the Canadian government and this government has confidence that she and Adams and the entire team, “will advise the government on the people’s best interest, this country’s best interest and the environment’s sustainability.”

On Saturday, an announcement only of the hiring of Redford  immediately prompted questions over her technical qualifications to conduct the review, which resulted in the ministry hours later explaining in a second press release that she would be leading a team and that she has also worked with other groups around the world to conduct similar reviews. It also detailed her experience in the field and in governance.

Former Petroleum Advisor to President David Granger,  Jan Mangal was vocal on Redford’s hiring as he questioned her expertise.  “Is the PPP trying to compete with the Coalition for mismanaging our oil? FDP’s are clearly not Ms. Redford’s expertise (from her Bio). Nor can one person do anything.  This is a very sad joke, at the expense of Guyana.  Did the PPP not look at Ms. Redford’s Bio? Do the Canadians take Guyanese for fools?” Mangal questioned.

“Below is her Bio from 2016. Clearly (she) has no business reviewing a FDP. How many FDP’s has she reviewed for similar deepwater projects like Payara?  I assume ZERO until told otherwise. Guyanese need to object to this inappropriate business.  This is so disheartening. Is there no hope for us?” he added.

Stabroek News reached out to Redford via email and calls to a number she had provided this newspaper with back in 2018, when she was a guest speaker at the Guyana Petroleum Exhibition (GIPEX). There was no response. She had been the keynote speaker on the topic ‘Partnerships Between International Companies and Local Partners – International Trends’.

Redford leads the team that will be reviewing the evaluation of plans for the development of ExxonMobil’s Payara oil field that is being undertaken by Bayphase Oil and Gas Consultants. The team also includes the former Deputy Minister of Energy in Newfoundland, Canada, senior international reservoir engineers and Jay Park, QC, Managing Partner of Park Energy Law based in Canada and the United Kingdom.

In 2018, the then APNU+AFC and the Government of the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for cooperation towards responsible oil and gas development opportunities.

Former Minister of Business, Dominic Gaskin and Natural Resources Minister of the Canadian province Siobhan Coady had inked the agreement for their respective countries.

On Saturday,  Redford, Guyana’s oil and gas oversight agency heads and a representative of Bayphase met with Bharrat.

‘Reputation’

The Minister of Natural Resources reiterated that the team came from recommendations of the Canadian government which has been assisting the sector for some time and defended the decision.

“Alison came on recommendation and with a grant from the Canadian government. They will not jeopardize their reputation to recommend someone they feel does not meet the requirement,” he said.

The Ministry on Saturday had highlighted Redford’s profile. It stated that she has served as a World Bank advisor on gas sector reform in Pakistan and also as an advisor in other jurisdictions, as they develop novel approaches to upstream regulation and community engagement.

It added that as Premier of the Canadian province of Alberta, she introduced the Responsible Energy Development Act, which created the Alberta Energy Regulator.  The Act sets out rigorous regulation, compliance and enforcement provisions on all aspects of oil and gas production, including permits and licences.

Further, it said she also developed the Canadian Energy Strategy for Canadian First Ministers and the Transition Energy Initiative for the Conference Board of Canada.

The ministry also noted that Redford served as Attorney General of Alberta from 2008 to 2011 and as Premier from 2011 to 2014, overseeing the legislative, policy, political and financial operations of the Province with a $40 Billion CDN (balanced) budget, including, oversight of the Province’s sovereign wealth fund.

It said she has also worked on several bilateral and multilateral projects particularly in energy sector regulation and has worked in multiple countries on behalf of the United Nations, the Commonwealth and the European Union.

“…I[t] must be emphasized that while this is a limited reflection of Ms. Redford and her team’s skills and capacity building abilities, they also have vast knowledge in the field of policies and legal framework that supports accountability and transparency within the petroleum sector,” the ministry said.

No mention was made that Redford had stepped down as Alberta’s premier in 2014 after serving for two and a half years following a series of questions about her leadership and controversy over expenditure on plane tickets. She resigned as a member of the legislative assembly for the electoral district of Calgary-Elbow, two days after the Alberta Justice Minister obtained a legal opinion that criminal charges against her were possible.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) had in 2014 opened an investigation after the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) revealed Redford had flown her daughter on 50 government flights.  Auditor General Merwan Saher conducted an audit of Redford’s travel expenses and her use of government planes. CBC had said that Saher found Redford and her office used taxpayer money “inappropriately” during her time as Alberta premier, with planes used for personal and partisan purposes.

In February of 2015, the RCMP closed the investigation without charges.

Django

It is the right move by the Guyana Government. Whether it is the wrong person who was hired is of no consequence to the Government and people.  It is the News reporters who are always hell-bent in finding faults in order to sell their fake news. The lady may have some faults of her own, but this world is of second chances.  Had it not been for second chances, then members of the PNC would not be allowed to run for public offices.

Is there anyone more qualified than team which was hired to do the job?

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

It is the right move by the Guyana Government. Whether it is the wrong person who was hired is of no consequence to the Government and people.  It is the News reporters who are always hell-bent in finding faults in order to sell their fake news. The lady may have some faults of her own, but this world is of second chances.  Had it not been for second chances, then members of the PNC would not be allowed to run for public offices.

Is there anyone more qualified than team which was hired to do the job?

and had not been for second chances, the PPP/C would not be allowed to run for public offices too.

Jobs to the cronies have just started. 

Mitwah
@Mitwah posted:

and had not been for second chances, the PPP/C would not be allowed to run for public offices too.

Jobs to the cronies have just started. 

At least they are qualified and would be working diligently for the people of Guyana. They are not cronies, they were former ministers who can still be of help for the government.  They have to hire trusted people who will not backstab them when the going gets tough. There are grey areas to be considered.   

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

At least they are qualified and would be working diligently for the people of Guyana. They are not cronies, they were former ministers who can still be of help for the government.  They have to hire trusted people who will not backstab them when the going gets tough. There are grey areas to be considered.   

It's still cronyism. Thanks for the confirmation. With time the onion that is planted will develop many more layers. 

Mitwah
@Mitwah posted:

It's still cronyism. Thanks for the confirmation. With time the onion that is planted will develop many more layers. 

That's not a crime. It is only a crime when you are paid for work of no value. Your coalition partners are guilty of that.  They were paid millions and millions of dollars and you didn't see anything wrong with that.

R
@Ramakant-P posted:

That's not a crime. It is only a crime when you are paid for work of no value. Your coalition partners are guilty of that.  They were paid millions and millions of dollars and you didn't see anything wrong with that.

You don't seem to have a problem with the appointment of friends and associates to positions of authority, without proper regard to their qualifications.

We are heading back to onion peeling days. Do you know how many layers one had to go through to get anything done in Guyana when the PPP was in power?

Mitwah
@Mitwah posted:

You don't seem to have a problem with the appointment of friends and associates to positions of authority, without proper regard to their qualifications.

We are heading back to onion peeling days. Do you know how many layers one had to go through to get anything done in Guyana when the PPP was in power?

It seems to me that you don't know what happened during the PPP reign when over 3000 projects were completed. Those friends and associates are well well qualified to do the job they were hired to do.  Do you actually think that the PPP would hire PNC goons to fill positions of authority when they couldn't do the job for the PNC government. Are you that naive?

You should pay attention to the quality of work that are being done by the PPP and compare it toi the PNC. Hiring former employees is not a crime.

We haven't started yet! Just wait and see what we are going to do for the country.  

R
@Django posted:

Appointment of Canadian Consultant has all the hallmarks of the oil curse – Int’l Lawyer 

…Review of 3rd well plan (Payara)

The recent appointment of former Alberta Premier, Alison Redford to review the field development plan for ExxonMobil’s third oil project, called Payara, has all the hallmarks of the oil curse says international lawyer, Melinda Janki.

Former Alberta Premier, Alison Redford

The transparency advocate’s strong comment comes on the heels of a missive issued by the government on Saturday evening to the effect that Redford, an ex-politician who resigned in 2014 for inappropriately spending Canada’s tax dollars, is leading a team on the review of the Payara plan. The PPP government had also said that Redford was hired thanks to a grant from the Canadian High Commission.

During an interview with Kaieteur News, Janki categorically stated that Guyanese have had enough of secrecy and strange decisions in the petroleum sector. She is of the view that the government must publish the criteria which it used in order to select Redford and her team for this important review.

Melinda Janki is absolutely correct with her views.

Qualifications and long-term direct experiences in this process is needed ... something grossly lacking with the selection of this individual to lead the team of experts.

While grants from international organizations are indeed useful, focus on the individuals and expert knowledge is paramount.

FM

THE WRONG CHOICE

Aug 17, 2020 News 0, Source - Kaieteur - News Online - https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...17/the-wrong-choice/

Ms. Alison Redford, QC, an ex-premier of Alberta, Canada, is the wrong person to head the expert review of the Payara Field Development Plan (FDP). She lacks the appropriate qualifications and experience in reviewing FDPs.

Guyana does not need a political and regulatory lawyer to spearhead such a vital technical review. Ms. Redford’s political record does not instill trust or assure public confidence. Her background raises concerns.

Guyana needs the best to undertake the review. It needs persons of unblemished reputations so that no aspersions can be cast on the review process. Guyana must be satisfied that Ms. Redford’s appointment has been endorsed at the highest levels in Ottawa. A team of experts specializing and with experience in conducting such reviews is needed to spearhead this exercise.

In the interest of transparency, the public needs to know the identities and credentials of the technical persons who are part of any review. We are therefore concerned about both Ms. Redford’s selection and the silence over the names of her support team.

The country can ill-afford another fiasco it its dealings with ExxonMobil. We have been taken advantage of before. The country was deprived of US$55B as a result of the flawed negotiations undertaken by the previous administration.The present review is our last chance to maximize the benefits for our people.

If we get it wrong, the present and future generations are doomed to a fate of scratching a living.

FM
@Ramakant-P posted:

It seems to me that you don't know what happened during the PPP reign when over 3000 projects were completed. Those friends and associates are well well qualified to do the job they were hired to do.  Do you actually think that the PPP would hire PNC goons to fill positions of authority when they couldn't do the job for the PNC government. Are you that naive?

You should pay attention to the quality of work that are being done by the PPP and compare it toi the PNC. Hiring former employees is not a crime.

We haven't started yet! Just wait and see what we are going to do for the country.  

The PNC and AFC are GREEN/YELLA with ENVY.

K
@Ramakant-P posted:

It seems to me that you don't know what happened during the PPP reign when over 3000 projects were completed. Those friends and associates are well well qualified to do the job they were hired to do.  Do you actually think that the PPP would hire PNC goons to fill positions of authority when they couldn't do the job for the PNC government. Are you that naive?

You should pay attention to the quality of work that are being done by the PPP and compare it toi the PNC. Hiring former employees is not a crime.

We haven't started yet! Just wait and see what we are going to do for the country.  

What 3000 projects? You are are a barefaced liar. Cronyism has started all over again. That's what you should pay attention to. 

Mitwah
@Former Member posted:

Melinda Janki is absolutely correct with her views.

Qualifications and long-term direct experiences in this process is needed ... something grossly lacking with the selection of this individual to lead the team of experts.

While grants from international organizations are indeed useful, focus on the individuals and expert knowledge is paramount.

It's your PPP at work doing what they do best...picking unqualified people to do their corrupt bidding.  

T

PPP need not worry about the AFC PNC belly wok crew and must push ahead with a female and Alberta Premier Alison Redford as a consultant. Alberta is the oil tycoon Province of Canada and she is a welcome addition.

AFC PNC belly wok crew can go and suck salt. 

PPP has more important things to do lthan working about the hapless AFC PNC bottom house crew and start working on locking up Burger bai Trotman. He gave away Guyana's oil. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Former Member posted:

PPP need not worry about the AFC PNC belly wok crew and must push ahead with a female and Alberta Premier Alison Redford as a consultant. Alberta is the oil tycoon Province of Canada and she is a welcome addition.

AFC PNC belly wok crew can go and suck salt. 

Alison Redford left office in Alberta under a cloud.  It is only appropriate that she be involved with the PPP...birds of a feather.  It is the Guyanese people who will suck salt .

T

You can join the bottom house crew and go suck salt too.

Bring her on. Guyana needs the oil tycoon Province Premier as their consultant. 

PPP needs to lock up AFC PNC's Trotman for giving away Guyana's oil. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Former Member posted:

You can join the bottom house crew and go suck salt too.

Bring her on. Guyana needs the oil tycoon Province Premier as their consultant. 

PPP needs to lock up AFC PNC's Trotman for giving away Guyana's oil. 

Suck salt?  You must be out of your mind but then again that would be stating the obvious.

T

Blah Blah Blah. PPP in Powah.  The Guyanese people will judge them at the polls in 10 years.

They have been given a mandate to govern and not worry about a bunch of sour P.

Sour grapes. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Former Member posted:

PPP need not worry about the AFC PNC belly wok crew and must push ahead with a female and Alberta Premier Alison Redford as a consultant. Alberta is the oil tycoon Province of Canada and she is a welcome addition.

=  Alison Redford as a consultant =

Consultant specifically in what ????? 

Surely not in this high-profile assignment.

 It is indeed an incoherent move by the government to have her even as a member the team.

FM

Janki and Mangal were hoping to get Advisor jobs, they are crying Sour Grapes.  Alison Redford knows about oil, she was the Premier of Canada's richest oil province, she comes with experience.

 DEAL WITH IT!!!

 GOOD TING PNC LOST.

K

Exactly. PPP has been given a mandate to govern and not worry about a bunch of belly ache, bottom house crew. 

She was indeed the Premier of Canada's oil tycoon state. Go PPP Go !!!

Alberta is not beggar man state like NYC where bums roam the streets begging for handouts every corner where your turn. 

Unknown

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Unknown
FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Ramakant-P posted:

At least they are qualified and would be working diligently for the people of Guyana. They are not cronies, they were former ministers who can still be of help for the government.  They have to hire trusted people who will not backstab them when the going gets tough. There are grey areas to be considered.   

How can you be so sure about this? They were corrupt for 23 years.

They have to be watched like a hawk...Guyana has a very corrupt culture...and we cant expect them all of a sudden to have clean hands... 

V

No corruption was proven by PNC in five years and Billions wasted on SARA and SOCU. Get your facts straight bai. 

Anti Corruption Hero Chris Ram is now in charge of watching over the politicians and AFC PNC criminals. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@kp posted:

Janki and Mangal were hoping to get Advisor jobs, they are crying Sour Grapes.  Alison Redford knows about oil, she was the Premier of Canada's richest oil province, she comes with experience.

 DEAL WITH IT!!!

 GOOD TING PNC LOST.

When Mangal said it will take years, he lost me. By the time he is complete, cars will be electric and Guyana left with white mouth.

Guyana needs to get Exxon to commit the sunk costs. After this, Guyana’s production becomes competitive on a Marginal basis. 

FM
@VishMahabir posted:

How can you be so sure about this? They were corrupt for 23 years.

They have to be watched like a hawk...Guyana has a very corrupt culture...and we cant expect them all of a sudden to have clean hands... 

There will be corruption.  The issue, does it stymie development?.  China shoot people in the head and they still have corruption. 

FM

Redford, who is a former Attorney General and Premier of Alberta, Canada, has worked with other groups around the world to conduct similar reviews in nature.
She has served as a World Bank Advisor on Gas Sector Reform in Pakistan and Afghanistan and in other jurisdictions, as they develop new approaches to upstream regulation, transparency and accountability inclusive of community engagement.
As Premier of Alberta, she introduced the Responsible Energy Development Act, which created the Alberta Energy Regulator. The Act sets out rigorous regulation, compliance, and enforcement provisions on all aspects of oil and gas production, including permits and licenses.
Further, she also developed the Canadian Energy Strategy for Canadian First Ministers and the Transition Energy Initiative for the Conference Board of Canada.

FM

The Government of Guyana needs to bring on board the university lecturer that Stabroek news uses to analyze the deal. Also the government needs to bring back Jan Mangal. 

This is not going to happen but I think they should look at the viability of Eric's deep water drilling project.

Prashad
@Former Member posted:

Mangal isn't  even qualified to polish Redford's shoes. 

He just got Ganda eggs on his face. 

 

O come on don't be idiotic.  Redford is a lawyer and Mangal has  a Ph.D. in Oil and Gas.  What makes Redford more qualified than Mangal?  

T
@Former Member posted:

PPP need not worry about the AFC PNC belly wok crew and must push ahead with a female and Alberta Premier Alison Redford as a consultant. Alberta is the oil tycoon Province of Canada and she is a welcome addition.

=  Alison Redford as a consultant =

Consultant specifically in what ????? 

Surely not in this high-profile assignment.

 It is indeed an incoherent move by the government to have her even as a member the team.

Tola

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×