Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

British universities to mark abolition of Indian indentureship

 
2-day conference opens Friday

The University of Warwick’s Yesu Persaud Centre for Caribbean Studies and the University of London will be commemorating the centenary of the abolition of Indian indentureship in a two-day International Conference on the history and culture of Indian workers from 1838 to 1917, and the contemporary reality of migration to the Americas.

Some 45 scholars and writers from all parts of the world will gather at Senate House on October 6 and 7 to present papers on a variety of subjects, including the situation of Bhojpuri women in Mauritius and Suriname; Mauritian Hindi poetry and drama; Land issues in Fiji; the statutes of colonial Natal; the Indo-Caribbean Diaspora in the USA; Post-Indenture Trinidad and Tobago and Indian settlements in Guyana.

Professor David Dabydeen

An original aspect of the Conference will be comparative studies of Chinese migration to the Region, including to Cuba and other Spanish colonies. Two volumes of scholarship will be published from a selection of the papers given, and the Commonwealth Foundation will be funding the publication of an anthology of creative writing by descendants of Indian indentured workers, with poetry and prose from nearly 50 writers from South Africa, Fiji, Guyana, Mauritius, Canada, Trinidad, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, the USA and Canada.
“There are two distinctive aspects of the Conference,” says co-organiser Professor David Dabydeen.

“Firstly, the scope of the enquiry, covering practically all countries affected by Indian indentureship. Secondly, the majority of papers are being presented by young female scholars, many of whom will place women at the centre of the indentureship experience, whereas before they were largely omitted in historical accounts. My co-organisers, Dr Maria Kaladeen (School of Advanced Studies, London University) and Professor Tina Ramnaraine (Royal Holloway College, London University) are to be thanked abundantly for the Conference’s emphasis on women, and for the enormous effort they have put in to ensure the presence of women scholars and writers globally.”

A highlight of the Conference will be the inaugural Gafoor Lecture in Indian Indentureship, which will be given by the doyen of Indo-Caribbean Studies, the Trinidadian scholar, Professor Brinsley Samaroo. Funded by the Gafoor Foundation, the lecture will be on Islam in the Caribbean, and will reveal how the Holy Koran was first brought to the Caribbean by enslaved Africans who were Muslims, and Islam practised in the Region by Africans before Indian arrival.

According to Dabydeen, the Universities of Warwick and London will be organising annual Gafoor Lectures for the next 15 years.

“The Gafoor Lecture and the following Gafoor Lectures will be filmed and put on the social media so that anyone anywhere can access them free of charge. The International Conference itself will be similarly filmed and made available on the Internet. Our future plans are to organise joint scholarly events in all the countries affected by indentureship,” Professor Dabydeen said.

Britain is an appropriate place to begin this global outreach since Britain was responsible for what has been called the “new system of slavery”, Dabydeen added.

http://www.inewsguyana.com/bri...ndian-indentureship/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Demerara_Guy posted:

Indenture is a glorified British term for "slavery" for Indians brought to the colonies after the abolition of slavery around 1833.

Nonsense.  Indian indentures were seen as humans, even if very abused humans.  African enslaved people were seen as farm animals and weren't even allowed to get married.

There was much abuse in indentureship but pretending that it is equivalent to slavery is an insult. 

FM
caribny posted:
Demerara_Guy posted:

Indenture is a glorified British term for "slavery" for Indians brought to the colonies after the abolition of slavery around 1833.

Nonsense.  Indian indentures were seen as humans, even if very abused humans.  African enslaved people were seen as farm animals and weren't even allowed to get married.

There was much abuse in indentureship but pretending that it is equivalent to slavery is an insult. 

Suh then, a wheh the slaves got all that money to buy the village of Victoria in 1838.  And other surrounding villages nearby like Bachelor's Adventure.  Somebody gave them something.

Bibi Haniffa
Bibi Haniffa posted:
 

Suh then, a wheh the slaves got all that money to buy the village of Victoria in 1838.  And other surrounding villages nearby like Bachelor's Adventure.  Somebody gave them something.

Are you trying to tell us that slaves were paid when they were slaves? What an ignorant woman.

Slavery was abolished in 1834 but they were forced to work for the planters until 1838.  The money that they were paid during this period from this work, and income that they generated from other activities funded the purchase of failing estates which then became the free villages.

Now I know that you and the rest of your Indo KKK think that blacks cannot do anything unless someone gave them something but the facts show otherwise.  In fact while some Indians benefitted from land settlement programs the blacks were taxed heavily and their lands flooded and all attempts made to prevent them for buying more land after 1850.

The planters remained very hostile to these former slaves even after 1838.   Their special mission was to see these villages fail.

FM

The slave masters don't like white skin Indian working in mud or in the field. Most of them are made for wives. My great grandmother was married to a white man and my grandmother always tell us this story. White skin women are always given preferential treatment in the slavery days. 

FM
caribny posted:
Demerara_Guy posted:

Indenture is a glorified British term for "slavery" for Indians brought to the colonies after the abolition of slavery around 1833.

Nonsense.  Indian indentures were seen as humans, even if very abused humans.  African enslaved people were seen as farm animals and weren't even allowed to get married.

There was much abuse in indentureship but pretending that it is equivalent to slavery is an insult. 

Take the time to carefully assimilate the various authentic reports then reflect your skewed statement.

FM
Prince posted:

The slave masters don't like white skin Indian working in mud or in the field. Most of them are made for wives. My great grandmother was married to a white man and my grandmother always tell us this story. White skin women are always given preferential treatment in the slavery days. 

What  a reversal of fortune, you got white ancestry but yet you end up tekking black bigan. 

FM
Drugb posted:
Prince posted:

The slave masters don't like white skin Indian working in mud or in the field. Most of them are made for wives. My great grandmother was married to a white man and my grandmother always tell us this story. White skin women are always given preferential treatment in the slavery days. 

What  a reversal of fortune, you got white ancestry but yet you end up tekking black bigan. 

These chaps seem to love the black baigan.

FM
yuji22 posted:
Drugb posted:
Prince posted:

The slave masters don't like white skin Indian working in mud or in the field. Most of them are made for wives. My great grandmother was married to a white man and my grandmother always tell us this story. White skin women are always given preferential treatment in the slavery days. 

What  a reversal of fortune, you got white ancestry but yet you end up tekking black bigan. 

These chaps seem to love the black baigan.

Shame on Drugb and Yugi22. 

KP utho Bhai! 

Mitwah

Look story here, AFC/PNC Cut and Paste Trash Can attempts to speak, this is for the record books when a trash can can attempt to speak.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Demerara_Guy posted:

Take the time to carefully assimilate the various authentic reports then reflect your skewed statement.

Every single account will show that African slaves were chattel while Indian indentures were seen as humans. Indentures had the ability to enter into a contract. Clearly this contract was abusive.

Africans were listed among the horses and machinery as an asset.  The most important asset on most Caribbean plantations were the slaves.

Now please show how Indian indentures were seen as a balance sheet item.

Let me make it simple. Slaves=horses. They were treated like horses and had the legal rights of a horse.

FM
yuji22 posted:

These chaps seem to love the black baigan.

The biggest lovers of this are in fact the Indo KKK. I can never forget their shrill screams about PNC women with super cyats and dem strong PNC who can do what they want.  Such objectification of black masculinity was so easily discernible.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×