I did mention that just like many on this bboard I didn't vote in the recent Guyana elections but if I did vote I would have voted APNU since I was torn between the AFC and APNU but pretty much knew what I was getting with the APNU.
Well I think Freddie has some valid points in this article.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Was there a supernova of ethnic voting?
December 20, 2011 | By KNews | Filed Under Features / Columnists, Freddie Kissoon
I have not heard or seen in writing, even one commentator who disagreed with the opinion that the November 28 election was a massive manifestation of ethnic voting. It is easy to say that when you look at the phenomenon from the observable eye. When you factor in several other variables, the story becomes complicated.
First the AFC. It is obviously not situated within a particular ethnic cocoon. It didn’t evolve that way. A rejection of the AFC naturally led people to claim that it was decapitated by the race-vote. To what extent is this true? The AFC could have secured more votes if the AFC wasn’t the AFC between 2006 and 2011. After it won six seats (and got five) and became the third force in Guyanese politics, I wrote a column advising the AFC on its future.
Nothing in that column was manifested in the AFC’s post-2006 behaviour. The AFC office looked like a make-shift arrangement under the chambers of Raphael Trotman. In other words, it didn’t have an office. It was in the election period that it acquired a suitable place off Sheriff Street. Interestingly, the PPP applied for two house lots in Bath and got it. Immediately the PNC and AFC should have done that. They didn’t.
Between 2006 and 2011, the PNC faltered badly. The AFC failed to take the slack. Between 2006 and 2011, Georgetown knew nothing about the AFC. How then do you expect people to vote for you? Just two AFC names were visible in the fight to get Sharma back on the air – Michael Carrington and Gerhart Ramsaroop.
On the platform were, this writer, Mark Benschop, Lincoln Lewis, Christopher Ram, Robert Corbin, Rupert Roopnaraine. These names were in the nightly vigils too. Sharma got back his licence. The AFC couldn’t take credit for it. Other could. Others did. Why then did the AFC expect a deluge of votes from Georgetown?
It did get some and maybe the President’s libel case made sure of that with a high voltage performance by Nigel Hughes. The point is African Guyanese didn’t see the AFC as the aggressive party willing to confront a recalcitrant government.
When the PNC subsumed itself under APNU and Mr. Corbin took a backseat, African Guyanese felt that between the AFC and APNU, the latter was more equipped to carry the fight to the PPP.
More importantly, African Guyanese felt that APNU would have been more reliable in eradicating African marginalization if it got into government.
In a previous column I observed that votive motive may be more complex than we think. It is possible that had the AFC taken the fives years it had from 2006 to concretize itself in the body politic it could have had a better showing? Some say that Linden balloted for Trotman in 2006 and wasn’t interested in doing the same for Ramjattan in 2011. But Lindeners didn’t see much of the AFC after 2006.
Why should that not be a factor in assessing the AFC’s devastation in the mining city?
Did Africans vote for APNU because of race? How can one ascertain that when there was no logic in them voting for the PPP and they didn’t see the AFC as strong enough? Didn’t they vote for the party they thought had the best chance of fighting the PPP? Why should this factor be ignored when analyzing race voting in Guyana? Did the East Indians vote race?
Surely, the variables you use to determine the African-Guyanese attitude on Election Day cannot be the same for Indians?
No one in Guyana should have chosen the incumbent save for those who benefited from its corruption and incestuousness. In any normal society, the PPP would have been devastated. Indians like Africans in the spirit of that famous Gandhian saying, had a duty not to cooperate with evil. But they did. They gave the PPP a plurality of the votes to capture the presidency. Was that an ethnic reflex? In my opinion it was. But that is not the whole picture.
Region Six showed that there will eventually be a turning point in the long psychic journey of the East Indians of Guyana. The act of staying away did not scare them in Region Six in that they feared that if they did not go out to vote, the “Blaakman” would get in and dominate Indians.
[b]
The AFC may feel that it lost out in a pattern of ethnic rush to the polling station. But Region Six offers a phenomenal chance to change that and Guyana in the process.[/;b]
Well I think Freddie has some valid points in this article.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Was there a supernova of ethnic voting?
December 20, 2011 | By KNews | Filed Under Features / Columnists, Freddie Kissoon
I have not heard or seen in writing, even one commentator who disagreed with the opinion that the November 28 election was a massive manifestation of ethnic voting. It is easy to say that when you look at the phenomenon from the observable eye. When you factor in several other variables, the story becomes complicated.
First the AFC. It is obviously not situated within a particular ethnic cocoon. It didn’t evolve that way. A rejection of the AFC naturally led people to claim that it was decapitated by the race-vote. To what extent is this true? The AFC could have secured more votes if the AFC wasn’t the AFC between 2006 and 2011. After it won six seats (and got five) and became the third force in Guyanese politics, I wrote a column advising the AFC on its future.
Nothing in that column was manifested in the AFC’s post-2006 behaviour. The AFC office looked like a make-shift arrangement under the chambers of Raphael Trotman. In other words, it didn’t have an office. It was in the election period that it acquired a suitable place off Sheriff Street. Interestingly, the PPP applied for two house lots in Bath and got it. Immediately the PNC and AFC should have done that. They didn’t.
Between 2006 and 2011, the PNC faltered badly. The AFC failed to take the slack. Between 2006 and 2011, Georgetown knew nothing about the AFC. How then do you expect people to vote for you? Just two AFC names were visible in the fight to get Sharma back on the air – Michael Carrington and Gerhart Ramsaroop.
On the platform were, this writer, Mark Benschop, Lincoln Lewis, Christopher Ram, Robert Corbin, Rupert Roopnaraine. These names were in the nightly vigils too. Sharma got back his licence. The AFC couldn’t take credit for it. Other could. Others did. Why then did the AFC expect a deluge of votes from Georgetown?
It did get some and maybe the President’s libel case made sure of that with a high voltage performance by Nigel Hughes. The point is African Guyanese didn’t see the AFC as the aggressive party willing to confront a recalcitrant government.
When the PNC subsumed itself under APNU and Mr. Corbin took a backseat, African Guyanese felt that between the AFC and APNU, the latter was more equipped to carry the fight to the PPP.
More importantly, African Guyanese felt that APNU would have been more reliable in eradicating African marginalization if it got into government.
In a previous column I observed that votive motive may be more complex than we think. It is possible that had the AFC taken the fives years it had from 2006 to concretize itself in the body politic it could have had a better showing? Some say that Linden balloted for Trotman in 2006 and wasn’t interested in doing the same for Ramjattan in 2011. But Lindeners didn’t see much of the AFC after 2006.
Why should that not be a factor in assessing the AFC’s devastation in the mining city?
Did Africans vote for APNU because of race? How can one ascertain that when there was no logic in them voting for the PPP and they didn’t see the AFC as strong enough? Didn’t they vote for the party they thought had the best chance of fighting the PPP? Why should this factor be ignored when analyzing race voting in Guyana? Did the East Indians vote race?
Surely, the variables you use to determine the African-Guyanese attitude on Election Day cannot be the same for Indians?
No one in Guyana should have chosen the incumbent save for those who benefited from its corruption and incestuousness. In any normal society, the PPP would have been devastated. Indians like Africans in the spirit of that famous Gandhian saying, had a duty not to cooperate with evil. But they did. They gave the PPP a plurality of the votes to capture the presidency. Was that an ethnic reflex? In my opinion it was. But that is not the whole picture.
Region Six showed that there will eventually be a turning point in the long psychic journey of the East Indians of Guyana. The act of staying away did not scare them in Region Six in that they feared that if they did not go out to vote, the “Blaakman” would get in and dominate Indians.
[b]
The AFC may feel that it lost out in a pattern of ethnic rush to the polling station. But Region Six offers a phenomenal chance to change that and Guyana in the process.[/;b]