Skip to main content

October 28 ,2021

Source

A city magistrate yesterday upheld a no-case submission by the defence and dismissed the charges instituted against two police constables over the deleting of the Guyana Police Force’s (GPF) financial data.

Jenneka Carmichael, of Lot 121 Onderneeming, West Coast, Berbice, and Tatayana Smith, 21, of 43 Third Street, Alberttown, Georgetown, were freed of the charge after Magistrate Annette Singh, who was presiding over the trial, upheld a no-case submission. The trial was conducted at the Georgetown Magistrate’s Court.

Jenneka Carmichael

Jenneka Carmichael

Tatayana Smith

It is alleged that the two, on January 28, 2021, and February 04, 2021, at the Guyana Police Force Headquarters, Eve Leary, Kingston, Georgetown, intentionally and without lawful excuse or justification, deleted electronic data from the GPF’s computer that was in the administrative office of the Felix Austin Police College mess. Attorneys-at-law, Edrianna Stephens and Bernard DaSilva represented Carmichael and Smith respectively. The attorneys argued that the prosecution did not provide enough evidence to the court to sufficiently back the accusation. The prosecutor was Tuanna Hurdy.

The prosecution’s case is that the duo who had previously been released on $150,000 bail each, intentionally deleted electronic data from the computer that was in the administrative office of the Felix Austin Police College. The two constables were clerks attached to the Finance Department. This discovery was made following an investigation conducted by the Special Organized Crime Unit (SOCU).

SOCU had instituted charges of the same nature against a number of GPF members after the investigation was conducted by the Auditor General. Since then, the police have also acted on the audit findings. The GPF members are charged with committing fraud against the force amounting to over $19 million.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

From the inception the charges of deleting data was b****p . The SOCU team of investigators in this case are mal-educated.

Data can be retrieved if accidentally deleted ,unless the hard drive is hit with a sledge hammer or wiped clean.

Django
@Django posted:

From the inception the charges of deleting data was b****p . The SOCU team of investigators in this case are mal-educated.

Data can be retrieved if accidentally deleted ,unless the hard drive is hit with a sledge hammer or wiped clean.

Correct Django.

Whether the data is deleted accidentally or mistakenly, there are methods to recover such information.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Correct Django.

Whether the data is deleted accidentally or mistakenly, there are methods to recover such information.

As Django said, knock it with a sledge hammer an' the data would be exposed...BADDAM! Recovery in yo skites!

cain

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×