Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

 Then they need to get it right. They need to say that this is our campaign manager and his or her voice is the authority until the elections are over. They need to identify the goals, priority their means to end schema for achieving that goal and they have to be in possession of a playbook that all understands.

 

I think they should hire consultants  who ran campaigns and who will run theirs dispassionately. We have lots in our community abroad and I know a few. To win one must be soldiers following a general and if one cannot follow the lines of authority established for the process then one should fall out.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

 Then they need to get it right. They need to say that this is our campaign manager and his or her voice is the authority until the elections are over. They need to identify the goals, priority their means to end schema for achieving that goal and they have to be in possession of a playbook that all understands.

 

I think they should hire consultants  who ran campaigns and who will run theirs dispassionately. We have lots in our community abroad and I know a few. To win one must be soldiers following a general and if one cannot follow the lines of authority established for the process then one should fall out.

 

The party is a volunteer organization. I agree if they want to grow - and there is much scope for that - then they have to tighten up things. Having said that 7 seats was really good for a rag tag team. I think they can get 12 seats in a snap election.  They just need to tighten up things and pick the right battles. 

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

 Then they need to get it right. They need to say that this is our campaign manager and his or her voice is the authority until the elections are over. They need to identify the goals, priority their means to end schema for achieving that goal and they have to be in possession of a playbook that all understands.

 

I think they should hire consultants  who ran campaigns and who will run theirs dispassionately. We have lots in our community abroad and I know a few. To win one must be soldiers following a general and if one cannot follow the lines of authority established for the process then one should fall out.

 

The party is a volunteer organization. I agree if they want to grow - and there is much scope for that - then they have to tighten up things. Having said that 7 seats was really good for a rag tag team. I think they can get 12 seats in a snap election.  They just need to tighten up things and pick the right battles. 

Then it is time the begin to build the professional machinery. It fosters a party culture that facilitates people coming in understands and immediately find their place.  It will not grow if it is ad hoc. It's core members need to formalize the structure, consolidate its summoning creed. If they did so much on a volunteer force think how much more they can do with an phalanx armed with necessary information and tasked with precise missions.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Many of the persons that supported the AFC, and now beating their chest, while saying, Never again,never again,never again......

The PPP will lose by greater margins. The nation saw for the first time the depth of their depravity. They also get an understanding of how they can make a difference. Of the 10 percent that did not vote; hardly any will gravitate to the PPP.  They did not vote because they are disgusted with the government in power and unsure of the opposition ability to make a difference. They know what that difference is and the PPP has highlighted its sores to the public. Those people are gravitating to the AFC for sure.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

 

 
May 13, 2012 12:25 PM
 
 

Thank you Baseman.

Tarron (TK) said that Gerhard is a nice guy, nice to him but Gerhard was never nice to me. Gerhard is a vindictive back stabber with a smile on his face. I have been a victim of him, so I know what I am talking.

This guy Gerhard knows how to play the diplomatic game, he can fool people with his words and smile. But many persons in the rank and file of the AFC do not like him, they would only whisper around the place because they are afraid of victimisation from Gerhard.

 

TK is saying that a party has the right to monitor their speakers speech, who monitored Freddie Kissoon, Nigel Hughes and Mark Benschop speeches? Only my speech was monitored because of Gerhard Ramsaroop's jealousy.

I am challenging TK and Gerhard, why no speakers in the last elections criticised APNU except me?

I was the only AFC speaker who criticised both the PPP and APNU whereas all the other speakers target only the PPP, Jagdeo and Ramotar personally.

Bear in mind I was victimised and harassed by the PPP, in particular Clement "Goat na bite me" Rohee.

 

Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim Salahuddin Nausrudeen, had banned me from speaking at public meetings until Mr. Rafael Trotman took me to Kwakwani to speak on his platform. The ban was lifted when Freddie Kissoon insisted that he wants me to speak on the same platform with him and also when Rajendra Bissessar said he needed me and to hell with the ban.

Pradeep Bachan, the Region 5 Organiser said the people want me to go back at Region 5 and he organised many meetings at Region 5 for me to speak. Because of these pressures, Gerhard and his sidekick, Salim could not say anything and I recommenced my campaign.

Imagine they banned one of their own speakers without informing him or grant him a hearing, and these are the same people who are accusing the PPP of dictatorship.

How can you trust people like Gerhard, Salim Nausrudeen and now their backer Tarron Khemraj in a leadeship position in Guyana? They made a decision to ban me from speaking without informing me and they want power in Guyana.

 

TK did not spend much time in Guyana, just a few days and ran back to his hole in America. They want to live in America and Canada and win an election in Guyana.

The whole elections campaign was ill planned with no proper co-ordination. It was a disaster. It was like a family run business with Gerhard, his wife and Salim Salahudeen Nasrudeen in command. They were responsible for all the meetings and spending of money.

 

I must say I never received one dollar from the AFC but instead spent around G$200,000 from my own money. I do not want any refund , it is my contribution for what I thought was a good cause.

Many of us who spent our own money devoted time and labour, never even got a Thank You note from the so-called leadership.

One leader of the AFC asked this question of Mr. Yussuf (the whistleblower), " Ask him how much he contributed?". Now you do not measure a person's contribution in monetary form only, what about time and labour devoted and the votes he brought in?

Finally, I have no problem with any of the leaders or members of the AFC at this time except for Gerhard Ramsaroop and Salim Sallahudin Nausrudeen, as these are the two guys that victimized me in the AFC.

A few of the AFC executives are sympathising with me silently and I can understand why.

 Why did you not bring the whole thread so we do not have to re write our objections to what balram had to say above. He is aggrieved but he is aggrieved because he did not feel he was handled well. While I have not managed any elections I have been around people who do and for elections to go well even the candidate is managed.

 

Balram cannot speak where he choose to speak or thinks he is most efficient. He goes where he is directed.That is how it works and that is how it has to work and that is what the AFC has to tighten up on, its management and lines of authority at election time so everyone knows their place and their role in the process and are well apprised that while they may be displeased that is how it must be for efficient management.

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

 

I blame the AFC for running an incompetent campaign. But I don't know of any corruption and nepotism. That is downright dishonest and malicious. What lucrative contracts? 

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

 

I blame the AFC for running an incompetent campaign. But I don't know of any corruption and nepotism. That is downright dishonest and malicious. What lucrative contracts? 

Then maybe, just maybe, you were out of touch.  Fooling you and GR is like stealing candy from a baby. 

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

 

I blame the AFC for running an incompetent campaign. But I don't know of any corruption and nepotism. That is downright dishonest and malicious. What lucrative contracts? 

Then maybe, just maybe, you were out of touch.  Fooling you and GR is like stealing candy from a baby. 

You saw many things from afar. But yet the obvious raping of the people's monies elude you. You should not make up things to justify your decision to support the PPP because you feel you must maintain Indian hegemony. 

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Many of the persons that supported the AFC, and now beating their chest, while saying, Never again,never again,never again......

The PPP will lose by greater margins. The nation saw for the first time the depth of their depravity. They also get an understanding of how they can make a difference. Of the 10 percent that did not vote; hardly any will gravitate to the PPP.  They did not vote because they are disgusted with the government in power and unsure of the opposition ability to make a difference. They know what that difference is and the PPP has highlighted its sores to the public. Those people are gravitating to the AFC for sure.

No Party is likely to get 50% Votes in any Election from here on.

The PPP & PNC combined could end up with 60% of the total votes.

 


The AFC has 35% - 40% of the Votes secure......

Moses/Nigel Ticket will Guarantee this.

 

The AFC will reach over and include others in there Govt....

People like Anthony and maybe Jafarally or even Benn from the PPP.....

and People like Faith, Solamon and Roopnarine from the PNC....

 

I am telling you.....all Dem Poom Poom Cheese will be left in de cold to Cock-up-and-scratch like Big Seed Walla.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

 

I blame the AFC for running an incompetent campaign. But I don't know of any corruption and nepotism. That is downright dishonest and malicious. What lucrative contracts? 

Then maybe, just maybe, you were out of touch.  Fooling you and GR is like stealing candy from a baby. 

You saw many things from afar. But yet the obvious raping of the people's monies elude you. You should not make up things to justify your decision to support the PPP because you feel you must maintain Indian hegemony. 

You were too much into it. You can run and support Afro "hegemony" if it pleases you.  That's your choice.

FM
Originally Posted by Jalil:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Many of the persons that supported the AFC, and now beating their chest, while saying, Never again,never again,never again......

The PPP will lose by greater margins. The nation saw for the first time the depth of their depravity. They also get an understanding of how they can make a difference. Of the 10 percent that did not vote; hardly any will gravitate to the PPP.  They did not vote because they are disgusted with the government in power and unsure of the opposition ability to make a difference. They know what that difference is and the PPP has highlighted its sores to the public. Those people are gravitating to the AFC for sure.

No Party is likely to get 50% Votes in any Election from here on.

The PPP & PNC combined could end up with 60% of the total votes.

 


The AFC has 35% - 40% of the Votes secure......

Moses/Nigel Ticket will Guarantee this.

 

The AFC will reach over and include others in there Govt....

People like Anthony and maybe Jafarally or even Benn from the PPP.....

and People like Faith, Solamon and Roopnarine from the PNC....

 

I am telling you.....all Dem Poom Poom Cheese will be left in de cold to Cock-up-and-scratch like Big Seed Walla.

Next election:

 

PPP 58%

PNC 38%

AFC   4%

 

Mark my words.

FM
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by baseman:

 

AFC's systems suck. They have taken that liberal democratic idea too far. 

What amazes me with you, you know the corruption and nepotism which reared its ugly head in the AFC after they gained some traction in Guyana last election.  You know of the "players" who had their eyes on lucrative contracts, etc whole only interest was to round-out their resume for something bigger in the USA.

 

You know it and you pretend not to.  This is the essence of dishonesty.

 

I blame the AFC for running an incompetent campaign. But I don't know of any corruption and nepotism. That is downright dishonest and malicious. What lucrative contracts? 

Then maybe, just maybe, you were out of touch.  Fooling you and GR is like stealing candy from a baby. 

You saw many things from afar. But yet the obvious raping of the people's monies elude you. You should not make up things to justify your decision to support the PPP because you feel you must maintain Indian hegemony. 

You were too much into it. You can run and support Afro "hegemony" if it pleases you.  That's your choice.

Dude don't justify your race based decisions. There is no hegemony in my worldview. Only a free society based on meritocracy. The evidence shows that the only party which does not want constitutional reform is the PPP. Everyone wants to share except them and you have chosen to work with the greedy. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×