Withdrawal can mean any of the following:

1. As an esteemed lawyer herself, Justice Singh understands the case is a futile attempt to ursup the inevitable and does not wish to waste her precious time.

2. Justice Singh understands President Granger will be sworn in as President for a second term and no longer wishes to support the applicant's case. This can only mean she agrees with Lowenfield's report.

3. This was all a chess move. Make your enemies think they have won until the very last moment when they are trapped in their own web of lies.

Like I said - good luck PPP/C supporters.

Stay safe, Justice Singh.

The silence from a certain cohort is deafening. 

Sanjeev Datadin Roy Beepat ... not so ... she’s a Respondent and cannot withdraw ... the letter is not unusual and indicates she wishes, upon reflection, to not make submissions to the Court ... still a party and submissions to court of Appeal is still a matter of record

@Rochelle posted:

Withdrawal can mean any of the following:

1. As an esteemed lawyer herself, Justice Singh understands the case is a futile attempt to ursup the inevitable and does not wish to waste her precious time.

2. Justice Singh understands President Granger will be sworn in as President for a second term and no longer wishes to support the applicant's case. This can only mean she agrees with Lowenfield's report.

3. This was all a chess move. Make your enemies think they have won until the very last moment when they are trapped in their own web of lies.

Like I said - good luck PPP/C supporters.

 

Stay safe, Justice Singh.

She does not want to waste time.  After 4 months she cannot declare the results of March 02 Election, and you have the balls to say that she does not want to waste time?

@Former Member posted:

Sanjeev Datadin Roy Beepat ... not so ... she’s a Respondent and cannot withdraw ... the letter is not unusual and indicates she wishes, upon reflection, to not make submissions to the Court ... still a party and submissions to court of Appeal is still a matter of record

Dave, why do you think she wishes to no longer make submissions to the Court?

@Ramakant-P posted:

She does not want to waste time.  After 4 months she cannot declare the results of March 02 Election, and you have the balls to say that she does not want to waste time?

Correct. But who is the party doing most of the delay? Injunction after injunction after injunction preventing GECOM to do its work.

@Rochelle posted:

Correct. But who is the party doing most of the delay? Injunction after injunction after injunction preventing GECOM to do its work.

That's not the point.  The point is that the lady can't do her job.   Lowenfield stopped counting when he realized that the PPP was winning and she did nothing. 

Rochelle needs to go back to law school or whatever school she went to. Claudette Singh never withdrew from the CCJ appeal. People with big mouth spreading false information to fan the flames of hatred and division need to be locked up in a cage.

@Bibi Haniffa posted:

Rochelle needs to go back to law school or whatever school she went to. Claudette Singh never withdrew from the CCJ appeal. People with big mouth spreading false information to fan the flames of hatred and division need to be locked up in a cage.

Ok, so tell us what really happened then. Give us de soor. Poster Rochelle seem certain of this

@Bibi Haniffa posted:

Rochelle needs to go back to law school or whatever school she went to. Claudette Singh never withdrew from the CCJ appeal. People with big mouth spreading false information to fan the flames of hatred and division need to be locked up in a cage.

More than 40 percent of the students leave the secondary school system without a single subject. It explains everything

Stay safe and FOCUS Rochelle 

@Bibi Haniffa posted:

Rochelle needs to go back to law school or whatever school she went to. Claudette Singh never withdrew from the CCJ appeal. People with big mouth spreading false information to fan the flames of hatred and division need to be locked up in a cage.

Please tell me what false information can be ascertained from the below:

"...we do not wish to actively participate in the appeal"

"...we do not wish to make to make any submissions"

I'll wait....

@Former Member posted:

Stay safe and FOCUS Rochelle 

Is this coming from the same man that said the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and the COA actually heard the case?

@Sheik101 posted:

Ok, so tell us what really happened then. Give us de soor. Poster Rochelle seem certain of this

I waiting fo hear this too.

@Rochelle posted:

Is this coming from the same man that said the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and the COA actually heard the case?

 

 

And while u are waiting, please tell me why Jagdeo and the PPP needs to Assuage the General public if there's no proof of them having anything to do with the bombing of that Journalist car. Why couldn't it be any other party?

And so u know, I'm not a PPP or APNU supporter. Can't stand neither of the two.

@Sheik101 posted:

And while u are waiting, please tell me why Jagdeo and the PPP needs to Assuage the General public if there's no proof of them having anything to do with the bombing of that Journalist car. Why couldn't it be any other party?

And so u know, I'm not a PPP or APNU supporter. Can't stand neither of the two.

You're not going to bait me in trying to get this post closed, too. 

If you want to speak on that matter, PM me or create a new thread. 

Back on the topic at hand....

@Sheik101 posted:

And while u are waiting, please tell me why Jagdeo and the PPP needs to Assuage the General public if there's no proof of them having anything to do with the bombing of that Journalist car. Why couldn't it be any other party?

And so u know, I'm not a PPP or APNU supporter. Can't stand neither of the two.

Supporting AFC is supporting APNU.

@Rochelle posted:

You're not going to bait me in trying to get this post closed, too. 

If you want to speak on that matter, PM me or create a new thread. 

Back on the topic at hand....

LOL. Thanks for the props man .  I din know I had the power to mek threads get closed. Ah feel good now. 😃 😃. 

@Ramakant-P posted:

Supporting AFC is supporting APNU.

Not a supporter of AFC either.

@Rochelle posted:

Please tell me what false information can be ascertained from the below:

"...we do not wish to actively participate in the appeal"

"...we do not wish to make to make any submissions"

I'll wait....

@Bibi Haniffa posted:

Is that the best you can do? Can't think on your own two feet?

@Former Member posted:

Stay safe and FOCUS Rochelle 

This is all about semantics and Nandlall letting his political bias influence his professional honesty.  The statement from Justice Singh's lawyer to the CCJ is shown in Rochelle's initial post.  It's in plain English: GECOM will not actively participate in the hearing and will not make any submissions.  Nandlall whose pronouncements are treated as gospel by PPP supporters interprets the letter for his own purposes .  Why don't people read and make up their minds rather than having Nandlall tell them what to think.  

@Sheik101 posted:

LOL. Thanks for the props man .  I din know I had the power to mek threads get closed. Ah feel good now. 😃 😃. 

Bhai ,you calling a woman ,man.

@Django posted:

Bhai ,you calling a woman ,man.

No body knows the truth behind a keyboard, you have Princess, Petal, he ,she or it.

@kp posted:

No body knows the truth behind a keyboard, you have Princess, Petal, he ,she or it.

Rochelle is female.

Succinct part of the the Chairman Claudette Singh's letter ....

-- actively participate --

meaning -- deliberate way; vigorous way; etc., etc., etc..

@Django posted:

Rochelle is female.

Have you met her to be 100%? Just asking. No one knows. One has to be hesitant because in the past we have had many males pretending to be females. One cannot know for sure until he or she has seen or spoken to the member.

@Former Member posted:

Succinct part of the the Chairman Claudette Singh's letter ....

-- actively participate --

meaning -- deliberate way; vigorous way; etc., etc., etc..

She did not withdraw. She just stated her preference may be realizing that her original submission speaks loudly enough for the judges.

@Former Member posted:

Have you met her to be 100%? Just asking. No one knows.

One has to be hesitant because in the past we have had many males pretending to be females.

One cannot know for sure until he or she has seen or spoken to the member.

Bhai ,real doubting Thomas.

@Totaram posted:

This is all about semantics and Nandlall letting his political bias influence his professional honesty.  The statement from Justice Singh's lawyer to the CCJ is shown in Rochelle's initial post.  It's in plain English: GECOM will not actively participate in the hearing and will not make any submissions.  Nandlall whose pronouncements are treated as gospel by PPP supporters interprets the letter for his own purposes .  Why don't people read and make up their minds rather than having Nandlall tell them what to think.  

DaveVoice of the People

@Former Member posted:

I wonder how much PPP paid this journalist to tell the truth? Only PNC people see this highway robbery as PPP rigging.

Bolsanaro will be out in weeks.

@Django posted:

Rochelle is female.

How u know? yuh meet she?

@Sheik101 posted:

How u know? yuh meet she?

I asked the same question.

No submission is different from withdrawing. This gyal Rochelle is probably  preparing cook up rice and foo foo for lunch. 

@Former Member posted:

I wonder how much PPP paid this journalist to tell the truth? Only PNC people see this highway robbery as PPP rigging.

PNC blacks have no sense of decency and have no respect for democracy.

@Former Member posted:

No submission is different from withdrawing. This gyal Rochelle is probably  preparing cook up rice and foo foo for lunch. 

 

Being an attorney(supposedly) and spending all this time on this forum tells me something about our resident attorney. Either she is a fraud or her legal skills are not in demand. Prove me wrong.