GOVERNMENT Monday evening reiterated its stand of being open to any level of public scrutiny as regards any developmental project, and the Marriott Hotel project is no exception.
These remarks were made even as the one-seat majority opposition voted against public funds for the project, through a motion that was brought to the National Assembly by AFC member, Khemraj Ramjattan.
From the inception, the Marriot Hotel project has been a matter of great controversy for the opposition, notwithstanding the fact that it will create more than 250 jobs, generate income, and significantly boost Guyana’s capacity to become a high-end tourist destination.
Since the announcement of the project, the opposition’s reasons for not wanting it have varied from it not being economically viable, to insufficient information being made available, to the use of NICIL funds, which, Ramjattan insisted, ought to be deposited in the consolidated fund.
Despite these arguments, Minister of Finance, Dr. Ashni Singh holds strongly to the view that the opposition’s move to block this national project is clearly politically driven and has nothing to do with lack of transparency and openness, as they are claiming; noting that if they needed more information about the project, they would not have moved to block it altogether.
As for accusations that transactions with regard to the project are being done under a “cloak of secrecy” according to A Partnership for National Unity’s (APNU’s) member, Carl Greenidge, Minister Singh reminded that large volumes of documentation on the project, including answers to questions that were asked by Ramjattan, were tabled in the House and also distributed to the media.
However, there are certain confidentiality clauses that government is bound to at this stage of the project, and members of the opposition, many of whom are lawyers, including the mover of the motion himself, are aware that this is common practice in large business transactions.
Two market feasibility studies were conducted for the project, one by the Marriott Hotel Group, and one in 2010 by an independent American firm, which is being updated in 2012. There is also a draft Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) that is awaiting final issuance by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), pending the receipt of building permission.
These documents are confidential at this time; however, government is willing to have a closed-door presentation that will allow certain details of these documents to be made available under the condition of utmost confidentiality.
Responding to the aspersions that were cast by Greenidge on the integrity with which government has managed the privatisation process through NICIL, Minister Singh said, “The matter of accountability and transparency in privatisation transactions is a matter in which Mr. Greenidge has no moral authority.”
He told the House that former Auditor-General, Anand Goolsarran, is on public record as saying that Greenidge had refused him permission to
audit privatisation transactions. When this was said, Greenidge rose on a point of order to make his rebuttal; however, the Speaker told him to keep that matter for a press conference.
Greenidge also said that there is no guarantee that the project will be endorsed by the Marriott Company. However, in June 2010, Marriott International Inc. had announced that the 160-room hotel is on track to receive LEAD certification from the United States Green Building Council, and is on track of being Marriott’s lead hotel in the Caribbean and Latin America.
It will operate under a management agreement with Atlantic Hotel Inc. (AHI), which is currently owned by the Government of Guyana, as part of a public/private partnership between government and private sector investors.
In November 2011, former President Bharrat Jagdeo turned the sod for the construction of the Marriott Hotel at Kingston, Georgetown. The civil works contract for the project was a subject for a public tender and the price was announced.
“It is not a secret how much the hotel will cost, it is not a secret tender, and it is not a secret when the advertisement was placed. We have all the records of every advertisement and every bid received,” Minister Singh emphasised.
Meanwhile, Minister of Tourism, Industry, and Commerce (ag), Irfaan Ali, said that the opposition is of the view that the project is an inevitable failure, but to date, has failed to show solid analysis as to why the project would not be economically viable.
He, too, shares the view that the prolonged blockade of this development is driven by self-interest and he called on Ramjattan to come clean and declare his personal and political interests with regard to this project.
Minister Ali said that the tourism sector will benefit greatly from this development, and made reference to other countries that spent billions of dollars to build infrastructure that will boost their tourism capacity.
He also informed of Guyana’s growing popularity as a prominent tourist destination. Since 2001 to 2011, arrivals to Guyana increased by 58 percent, from 99,317 to 156,910.
Responding to the argument that government, being an investor, will deny the taxpayers and the revenue base of Guyana, important duties, taxes and other concessions, Minister Ali informed that any company investing in a hotel, 35 rooms and above, is entitled to certain incentives.
Attorney-General and Minister of Legal Affairs Anil Nandlall, questioned why Ramjattan chose to bring a motion to the House to challenge what he claims to be illegalities with regard to the Marriot project, when it is an established fact that motions do not have any binding force on government policies, instead of taking the matter to the courts.
“The reason why he cannot go and file a proceeding to challenge the illegality of which he speaks, in the court, is because it would not see the light of day in the court; the application will be rejected,” the AG said.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Samuel Hinds said that this project is a key investment for this country.
After several hours of debate, a division was called; resulting in 33 members voting for the motion and 31 against.
This project has an estimated capital cost of US$58. Funding will be in the form of debt and equity with government’s contribution being one-third of the funding.
The contract is being executed by Shanghai Construction Group (SCG). Completion and start of commercial operations of the hotel and entertainment complex is expected two years thereafter, that is, February 2014.
Excerpts from the Guyana Chronicle