70s, 80s PNC reincarnated through Granger in APNU …. woe be unto the nation were the opposition to ever regain the reins of political power-Rohee |
Written by Gary Eleazar |
Friday, 15 March 2013 20:55 |
THE NATION is now witness to the reincarnation of the People’s National Congress of the 1970s and 1980s, when vindictiveness was its hallmark. And this is being facilitated by the current A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) with Brigadier (rtd) David Granger at the helm. This was the contention yesterday by Minister of Home Affairs, Clement Rohee, who was at the time speaking at a People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPP/C) weekly press engagement, where he deemed what is currently going on in the National Assembly, “Parliamentary Assassination.” Rohee met with media operatives along with Prime Minister Samuel Hinds and Government Chief Whip, Gail Teixeira. The Home Affairs Minister said that during the heyday of the PNC in power, individuals who did not support were targeted. He said that the signs of the old PNC’s reincarnation were evident at the last sitting of the National Assembly within the realms of APNU. “I would wish to say to the public, woe be unto the nation, were the opposition to ever regain the reins of political power,” according to Rohee, as he pointed to what he called efforts to “return to the wild horse syndrome”. He said that the parliamentary assassination has begun, and observed that the attacks have nothing to do with him. Rather, “I am being used by the opposition as a means of getting to the government”. This he said was glaring in Granger’s admission following the latest parliamentary fallout, when he indicated that the move to block the Firearms (Amendment) Bill was meant to send a message to the Executive. The Minister of Home Affairs said too, that while the opposition has said it is championing accountability, “it is clear from their action, that they are not accountable to the Guyanese population they have ridden roughshod over?”. National interest includes ensuring that its borders are not violated, according to Rohee. He said that persons who engage in trafficking of firearms have no respect for borders. He asked, “Are we to draw the same conclusion, that the opposition, by complicity, is supporting persons who engage in those criminal activities”. Had the legislation been passed and assented into law, it would have had made the security forces stronger in their efforts, in that they would have the “legal backing to do what they have to do to stop the firearms from coming in…we have gaps in our law and we are now seeking to bridge those gaps, and lo and behold, it was shot down by (the) opposition”. He said that his view of the opposition action is that “Rohee’s head is much more valuable than the protection of our national sovereignty”. The Home Affairs Minister said that the public will judge, and he referred to the fact that the opposition had failed in the courts and Parliament to seek to have him gagged, and further the Commission of Inquiry into the Linden killings also exonerated him. “I am confident that they will fail in this one, that is preventing the Minister of Home Affairs from presenting Bills…the Bill is not about Rohee, but about the national interest”. He suggested that when a political party is “prepared to sacrifice national interest for narrow political interest, we must take warning”. The Government Chief Whip and Presidential Advisor on matters of governance, weighing in on the voted down firearms legislation, told members of the media that the political posturing of the opposition is vindictive and anti-national, and particularly offensive to every Guyanese affected by crime, one way or another. She drew specific reference to the General Secretary of the PNCR, Oscar Clarke, who was himself recently shot and injured during a robbery attempt at his home. Teixeira suggested that Clarke and his family must find the action by the opposition parties to be unacceptable. Teixeira reminded the media of the nature of the Bill voted down, and what the government was looking to criminalize, namely the trafficking of firearms along with the importation of firearm components that can be later assembled into completed weapons. Such a step by the ruling party in taking the legislation to the House was to reduce crime; but this “has now been brazenly stopped in its tracks by the opposition”. She said the opposition, in its election campaign, used security as its major platform, but has in fact taken a myopic and anti-national position, And she lamented the fact that Bill cannot be returned to the Parliament “seems to mean nothing” to the opposition. Commenting on whether government would budge on its position regarding the Minister of Home Affairs, Teixeira reminded that it is the President that has appointed Rohee as minister, and reiterated that the opposition has not provided anything of substance to warrant the removal of any minister, including Rohee. “They have made accusations and each has been shot down,” said Teixeira, who questioned whether it is now just a matter of bullyism. She said that the combined opposition has taken on the role of accuser, judge, jury and executioner. “We will stand by the principle and rights issue that people have a right to due process,” said Teixeira, adding that Rohee has been vindicated at every level. She says that the opposition tactic has now morphed into parliamentary assassination and reminds that it isn’t the first such “targeted and systematic” strategy utilized against members of the government. Teixeira drew reference to attacks against the Former Minister of Home Affairs, Ronald Gajraj. “They did it with Gajraj,” said Teixeira, adding that the attacks against the former minister persisted despite his being vindicated by a Commission of Inquiry. She says also that the current Agriculture Minister, Leslie Ramsammy, during his tenure at the Health Ministry, was also subject to similar attacks. “He (Rohee) is here and we will stand by our minister,” said Teixeira, pointing out that “if they can prove that he did something wrong, that is a different issue.” Responding to quips by the AFC that it will pilot a similar Bill to the one voted down, and approve that one, Teixeira called the position “absolutely banal, bizarre, crazy mad.” She says that the worrying developments in the House must not be taken lightly and “people must be worried about this level of thinking.” Teixeira reminded the media that as long as a bill has been defeated in the House, it cannot be returned until the establishment of a new Parliament that would follow an election cycle. She said government will wait and see what ‘magic’ the opposition intends to propose in a bid to manipulate the Parliamentary Standing Orders.
|