WTR. If people go to public forums and pose up and mek speech, that’s postable.

What if it's a public picture?

I agree. How about pictures from the public domain ? Come on DJ, please be more specific. How about people rubbing shoulders with politicians at public events ? 

Sean posted:

I agree. How about pictures from the public domain ? Come on DJ, please be more specific 

I took it from a public domain. 

I posted my picture...you didn't see me complain

methinks my time as Admin coming to an end if I carry on like this

O Rass bai Ray, like you getting censored now. 

Baseman posted:

Sean posted:

I agree. How about pictures from the public domain ? Come on DJ, please be more specific 

I took it from a public domain. 

DJ rass acting like a cowboy now. Bai DJ, fix up issues like racist posts, misleading headings of articles like which Ronan posted yesterday, archiving info, face lift etc. 

Sean posted:

O Rass bai Ray, like you getting censored now. 

I am friend of the new owner

Imagine all these years Ray police this rumshop and he doesn’t know the rules. Typical PNC incompetence. 😀

ksazma posted:

Imagine all these years Ray police this rumshop and he doesn’t know the rules. Typical PNC incompetence. 😀

bai...ress yuself...PNC know enough to rig elections...dats all we need to know

ksazma posted:

Imagine all these years Ray police this rumshop and he doesn’t know the rules. Typical PNC incompetence. 😀

He ran it like a drunken KSI manager.

plus I know how to push the ban button

The way I see it. If someone was to post their picture, or pictures of their families on the internet. It is for public viewing. People are intelligent to know that once it goes on the internet, its free play. 

I would say not to use the pictures as a means of slandering or insulting the subject(s) 

Amral posted:

The way I see it. If someone was to post their picture, or pictures of their families on the internet. It is for public viewing. People are intelligent to know that once it goes on the internet, its free play. 

I would say not to use the pictures as a means of slandering or insulting the subject(s) 

heh heh ...

Amral posted:

The way I see it. If someone was to post their picture, or pictures of their families on the internet. It is for public viewing. People are intelligent to know that once it goes on the internet, its free play. 

I would say not to use the pictures as a means of slandering or insulting the subject(s) 

I would not be that general about private pics.  However, pics from public events which appear on the event’s FB or other website is another matter.

Sean posted:

How about pictures from the public domain ?

Come on DJ, please be more specific.

How about people rubbing shoulders with politicians at public events ? 

Pictures from public domains would have actual name(s) of individual(s).

Hence, the names in the public domains would not match those used by members on GNI except for a few individuals who use their real names.

Ray posted:

I posted my picture...you didn't see me complain

Why complain ,you posted it.

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

Baseman posted:

Sean posted:

I agree. How about pictures from the public domain ? Come on DJ, please be more specific 

I took it from a public domain. 

Post the source of the domain.

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Ray posted:

I posted my picture...you didn't see me complain

Suuhhh, yuh gan komplane now 'bout wha yuh do tuh yuself.

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

I thought you were going to say is like the neighbor leaving dem door open. 😀

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

What if yuh friends share them. Leonora was in the habit of trying to get things through the back door. Being a smooth operator, I had no problem turning her down nicely.

So Base cyant post Gilda picha no mo?

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Your pic is on social media. 

People posting your photos without permission? It's illegal

Smith said what is happening is absolutely illegal, citing copyright infringement and identity theft. But he said prosecuting the digital kidnappers is like entering a legal black hole in cyberspace.

ksazma posted:

So Base cyant post Gilda picha no mo?

Which Gilda pic?  And is Gilda a poster on GNI?

BTW . Amral said who take over this site will have to post their correct infor… couldn't remember picture ting.

Is that still stands Amaral.

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Your pic is on social media. 

Only friends can view my FB album. I am aware some are out there.

I don't care if someone sees my picture. Only about 40 people in the world know who I am...my relatives and a few friends.

Django posted:

People posting your photos without permission? It's illegal

"This is the future, and it's not going to change," said attorney David Smith with the Smith Ammons law firm.

Smith said what is happening is absolutely illegal, citing copyright infringement and identity theft. But he said prosecuting the digital kidnappers is like entering a legal black hole in cyberspace.

These people are posting anonymously, not using real names," Smith said. "Finding them to get the right person - that's the problem. So even if they are committing a true crime, you're kind of stuck."

Banna, you getting carried away with stupidness.  Private pics at a private event is one thing. Pics at a public event are another!

BJs events are all public. The pics appear on multiple sites!  These can be reposted.

ksazma posted:

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

What if yuh friends share them.

Leonora was in the habit of trying to get things through the back door. Being a smooth operator, I had no problem turning her down nicely.

If shared on FB ,it will be known who share the pic.

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Your pic is on social media. 

Only friends can view my FB album. I am aware some are out there.

I saw one with you walking around a pool semi nude.  It’s on Google.

Baseman posted:

Django posted:

People posting your photos without permission? It's illegal

"This is the future, and it's not going to change," said attorney David Smith with the Smith Ammons law firm.

Smith said what is happening is absolutely illegal, citing copyright infringement and identity theft. But he said prosecuting the digital kidnappers is like entering a legal black hole in cyberspace.

These people are posting anonymously, not using real names," Smith said. "Finding them to get the right person - that's the problem. So even if they are committing a true crime, you're kind of stuck."

Banna, you getting carried away with stupidness.  Private pics at a private event is one thing. Pics at a public event are another!

BJs events are all public. The pics appear on multiple sites!  These can be reposted.

If public pictures posted ,post the link of the site.

Baseman posted:

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Your pic is on social media. 

Only friends can view my FB album. I am aware some are out there.

I saw one with you walking around a pool semi nude.  It’s on Google.

Ha...ha..never .

Dave posted:

BTW . Amral said who take over this site will have to post their correct infor… couldn't remember picture ting.

Is that still stands Amaral.

Yes, sooner or later Django will have to give more information about himself. It only makes the community feels more united. 

Baseman posted:

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Amral posted:

FB pictures are viewable unless you make them private. Like mine. So if you are stupid enough to leave your profile open, too bad. That's like leaving your car door unlock. You are careless. 

My FB pictures are not public ,only friends can view.

Your pic is on social media. 

Only friends can view my FB album. I am aware some are out there.

I saw one with you walking around a pool semi nude.  It’s on Google.

Were you scared? Which part of the body was nude, top or bottom?