from this:

I have to say this. General Granger is one of the most humble, most gracious, most decent decent human beings I've ever met.

He is perfectly suited to be President. I think all Guyanese would be proud of him.

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/pp...was-armchair-general

to the blood-curdling 'Indo President or nothing' screech here:

. . . Personally, I now see the PNC is not serious about shared governance. It's still all about hegemony. The AFC was not negotiating the future role of the AFC in the government of Guyana but also the future of Indian political power in Guyana in a very hostile racial environment (hostile to everyone) that has no mercy for the race that does not "win." Anything less than legal parity of coercive power between the PNC and the AFC in a Coalition was not worth it.

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/th...8#438854692516152728

go figure . . . or not

I doan know how you do it bai. I just don't.

How is it possible that someone who seems by all appearances to have availed himself of a liberal education to make postings like this?

i personally like to think of it as pulling down y'all panties so that people can see your disease

Also, how is it possible for someone to live their life absent words/concepts like nuance and context?

dat sounds suspiciously like the smoke Kari likes to blow out of his ass when he gets a brain freeze but needs badly to write something . . . u picking up bad habits hanging out with bhai Karimullah

However, you have been able to beat the odds and accomplish this truly enviable state of cognitive dissonance.

i suggest that u consult a dictionary and stop misusing that term

No 1. My personal opinion of General Granger has not changed. He is eminently suited to be President of Guyana. He is absolutely the superior of Ramotar in every way. My personal affections for the man remain undiminished.

relevant only in the sense that your PERSONAL position now is that only an Indian President [PPP or coalition] is fair

No 2. This Munich Agreement was/is a bad one. It could have only been made only by a PNC that is just ignorant of reality or more likely paranoid like a motherfoucker. It shows me that the PNC could not bring itself to concede substantive power to an Indian partner because they didn't. They offered to give some coolies some fancy titles. That's it.

Cheap demagoguery requiring only ridicule. The agreement may have been a bad one, but it took two to make it, Moses Nagamootoo and the AFC signed on the dotted line . . . they obviously saw merit in it. if, as you aver, David Granger is an honorable man "suited" to be president, why compare him here to Adolf Hitler?

No 3. This Agreement forces the Indos to make the PPP v PNC choice. The Indians should not be put in the position of having to vote fo the party that gave them a dictatorship and then the "Beat & Kill Nuff Coolie" post-election spectacles.

irrelevant . . . this thread is about you being a hypocrite and not about the merits of coalition strategy

No. 3. An APNU Minority Presidency was a realistic (and even desirable) outcome of a three-way race. Some Indian substantive power would have existed in Parliament as the Majority check on an APNU President.

irrelevant (again) . . . this thread is about you being a hypocrite and not about the merits of coalition strategy

Now, we have a Darwinian struggle for group power and no reasonable rational choice for disaffected persons who don't wanna join the struggle for ein fuhrer, ein volk ein reich.

more irrelevancy . . . this thread is about you being a hypocrite; skip the German, "Jai Hind" fits u better

'respectfully' Herr [mini me] Goebbels. . . my responses in bold above

Now please comment about the prospects of rural Indian voters now being asked to vote for the same PNC, who they claim attacked them after the elections of 1997, and 2001, and who they claim was involved in massacres at Lusignan, etc.

Don't argue your perceived truth.  Argue based upon how they will support the PNC based upon their perceived truth.  It is THEIR vote and not yours which will determine the results of the election.

wrong thread . . . that's why i ignored your previous post

u should start one for yourself since u seem determined to 'resolve' a debate u are having with no one

I am debating with lots of people.  You seem content to launch personal attacks.

not with me . . . certainly not on this thread

I realize that as you are too busily mumbling to yourself when not launching personal attacks.  You have no ability to craft an argument which says that the APNU/AFC stunt INCREASES the probability that the PPP will lose.

P.S....the debate is generally over as soon as one party throws in Hitler. 

you know, I really do prefer being personally attacked by the Gold Teet Brigade. At least dem bais would occasionally mix their remarkable stupidity with something genuinely funny.

Like Kneeru for example. He will spend all day saying stupid things and then he will regale me with a tale of Burnham oppression because he once had to eat breadfruit curry instead of finest curry of aloo.

You on the other hand chap are not only stupid. You're worse. You're a bore. The worst sin in my book.

I'm not even interested in patting you on your thick head.

-Herr Shaitaan

i just notice you slip wan by me hay by not mentioning my name

coward move, but is a nice try . . . from Kari's ole playbook

it's good that u are afraid

it would be better though if u figure out a way to cover up dem sores i exposing on this thread

your disease is deep, but antibiotic cream might work on the things that show

You are amusing in the venom of your attacks.

That doesn't change the fact though. Shaitaan, caribj, and redux can spout all we want but its the grass roots people of Guyana, the cities, the rural areas, and the interior who will determine who wins.  Not those of us sitting down in front of our computers, living in NYC or Toronto.