Skip to main content

Islamist sect Boko Haram claimed responsibility for a wave of Christmas Day bombings on Sunday, including an attack on a Catholic church that killed at least 35 people.

Boko Haram spokesman Abu Qaqa claimed the bombings in a statement to the journalists' association of Maiduguri, capital of the group's heartland.

The Christmas Day attacks show the growing national ambition of Boko Haram, which is responsible for at least 491 killings this year alone, according to an Associated Press count. The assaults come a year after a series of Christmas Eve bombings in Jos claimed by the militants left at least 32 dead and 74 wounded.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by TI:
What more info you need? The big mullahs don't issue fatwah on these acts. They are more preoccupied with cucumbers and balanjays.


And here lies the great hypocricy in our community. Muslims are their worse enemies but cannot realize it because they are too preoccupied by who else are their enemies.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Mara:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
These idiots are plain and simple Murderers

yep, but who do you think has sponsored these attacks and benefit the most?
Can you see the big picture?


Let me guess, the hands of the Great Satan is somewhere behind the curtain pulling the strings Wink
Nigeria is poised to become the largest economy of Africa by the end of the decade, and therefore very influential in global affairs. These attacks look to me more as part of a policy of containment focused on derailing that path.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
Originally posted by Mara:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
These idiots are plain and simple Murderers

yep, but who do you think has sponsored these attacks and benefit the most?
Can you see the big picture?


Let me guess, the hands of the Great Satan is somewhere behind the curtain pulling the strings Wink
Nigeria is poised to become the largest economy of Africa by the end of the decade, and therefore very influential in global affairs. These attacks look to me more as part of a policy of containment focused on derailing that path.


So America is the sponsor of these attacks. Man, you're even more loonie than I thought. You must be smoking that Colombian stuff again.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by AndrÃĐ:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
Originally posted by Mara:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
These idiots are plain and simple Murderers

yep, but who do you think has sponsored these attacks and benefit the most?
Can you see the big picture?


Let me guess, the hands of the Great Satan is somewhere behind the curtain pulling the strings Wink
Nigeria is poised to become the largest economy of Africa by the end of the decade, and therefore very influential in global affairs. These attacks look to me more as part of a policy of containment focused on derailing that path.


So America is the sponsor of these attacks. Man, you're even more loonie than I thought. You must be smoking that Colombian stuff again.
.. it is actually that Afghani stuff brought by the US military.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
Originally posted by AndrÃĐ:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
Originally posted by Mara:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucas:
quote:
These idiots are plain and simple Murderers

yep, but who do you think has sponsored these attacks and benefit the most?
Can you see the big picture?


Let me guess, the hands of the Great Satan is somewhere behind the curtain pulling the strings Wink
Nigeria is poised to become the largest economy of Africa by the end of the decade, and therefore very influential in global affairs. These attacks look to me more as part of a policy of containment focused on derailing that path.


So America is the sponsor of these attacks. Man, you're even more loonie than I thought. You must be smoking that Colombian stuff again.
.. it is actually that Afghani stuff brought by the US military.
do us a favor, take your god damn meds.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by TI:
What more info you need? The big mullahs don't issue fatwah on these acts. They are more preoccupied with cucumbers and balanjays.


Stop spouting BS !!! It does not matter how many time a lie is repeated; at the end of the day it is still a LIE. No mullah ever said any such thing about cucumbers or boulangers ... did you not notice that no name was mentioned in the article or are you blind (by bias and ignorance) ?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by TI:
The cucumber story may be not be true, but the slew of idiotic fatwas that emanate from these idiot mullahs not only make them a laughing stock, but is a blight on religion.


Then they will slowly fade into oblivion like all the other idiots. Again, my advise is for you to do something more useful with your time.

The issue in Africa is not religion, its tribalism and that has been there forever, the west is just taking advantage of the situation on the ground.
AJ
quote:
Originally posted by TI:
I doubt burning a church on Christmas day is tribal. Seems to have religious implications.


People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad, aka Boko Haram, is a militant Islamic group committed to the imposition of Sharia Law throughout Nigeria. It is no coincidence that they chose Christmas Eve 2010 and Christmas Day 2011 to carry out their worst terrorist attacks against Christians and their churches.

Of course these bombings are motivated by religious hatred.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by AndrÃĐ:
quote:
Originally posted by TI:
I doubt burning a church on Christmas day is tribal. Seems to have religious implications.


People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad, aka Boko Haram, is a militant Islamic group committed to the imposition of Sharia Law throughout Nigeria. It is no coincidence that they chose Christmas Eve 2010 and Christmas Day 2011 to carry out their worst terrorist attacks against Christians and their churches.

Of course these bombings are motivated by religious hatred.



I ask you and everyone else here one question:

WHAT IS SHARIA LAW?

Did Sharia law cause these people to bomb the church?
AJ
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
Originally posted by AndrÃĐ:
quote:
Originally posted by TI:
I doubt burning a church on Christmas day is tribal. Seems to have religious implications.


People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad, aka Boko Haram, is a militant Islamic group committed to the imposition of Sharia Law throughout Nigeria. It is no coincidence that they chose Christmas Eve 2010 and Christmas Day 2011 to carry out their worst terrorist attacks against Christians and their churches.

Of course these bombings are motivated by religious hatred.



I ask you and everyone else here one question:

WHAT IS SHARIA LAW?

Did Sharia law cause these people to bomb the church?
No, Sharia Law did not cause the church to be bombed. Is that what you understood based on what I said? Religious hatred is the motivation for these bombings. Jihadist sympathizers such as yourself try to peddle the lie that religious hatred has nothing to do with it.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
No, Sharia Law did not cause the church to be bombed. Is that what you understood based on what I said?

I really dont have a clue what you said, please explain and dont forget my first question.


I write clear and concise English that anyone with a decent secondary school education can understand. If you failed to grasp what I wrote before, then you don't need me to explain to you. What you really need is to go back to school and brush up on your English Comprehension skills. It's worth a shot though your chances for success may be slim or next to none because if you haven't got it by this age you may be beyond help.

Your first question is silly and is not worthy of me wasting my time to answer it.

Belated Merry Christmas and have a Happy New Year.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
Your first question is silly and is not worthy of me wasting my time to answer it.


No question is silly when you cant even begin to provide an answer.

If you were to give the proper answer, then the rest of you hogwash will become irrelevant.


It is a silly question because if you're a Muslim and you don't already know the answer, then you have to be a moron. Even if I didn't know the answer to such a simple question, I could easily find the definition and give it to you. Besides that, I've already told you that Sharia Law is not the cause for the churches being bombed so it is irrelevant to my discussion. Deal with what I've stated that's relevant.

However, you can choose to continue with your usual modus operandi of running around in circles and throwing up smokescreens to excuse the behavior of these terrorists which you support. You are religious zealots alike so I can understand why you are a Jihadist sympathizer even when they display their murderous traits for the world to see.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
No, Sharia Law did not cause the church to be bombed. Is that what you understood based on what I said?

I really dont have a clue what you said, please explain and dont forget my first question.
You are of the opinion that your question supplants the reality to reconcile acts by a religious fundamentalist group using violence as an instrument of terror to highlight their rejection of the basics for the nations legal system. It wants Islamic law, whatever its conceive it to be, as the basis in the law. What the hell does that have to do with the meaning of Sharia as we conceive it to be ie basic propositions, mullah interpreted that could be deemed a legal system prescribed by the Koran?

Obviously they have a concretion of it and recognize its absence in the society and so bombed christian churches on a christian holiday to highlight that fact. Note, they chose a name for their organization to highlight that fact. "BOKO Haram" is supposed to mean anything western is haram. That apparently is a necessary condition for Sharia as well so none of us have any other way of qualifying it.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
Your first question is silly and is not worthy of me wasting my time to answer it.


No question is silly when you cant even begin to provide an answer.

If you were to give the proper answer, then the rest of you hogwash will become irrelevant.
How about this question; what is your point? Knowing Sharia is not the necessary condition here. A group claiming they know what it is and given to violence sees it as necessary. Could it be that they hope to educate the rest of the world of its meaning by the necessity for violence when Sharia is not the basis for the law!
FM
quote:
Originally posted by D2:
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
quote:
Your first question is silly and is not worthy of me wasting my time to answer it.


No question is silly when you cant even begin to provide an answer.

If you were to give the proper answer, then the rest of you hogwash will become irrelevant.
How about this question; what is your point? Knowing Sharia is not the necessary condition here. A group claiming they know what it is and given to violence sees it as necessary. Could it be that they hope to educate the rest of the world of its meaning by the necessity for violence when Sharia is not the basis for the law!


If you read, it will do wonders for you.

I didn't bring sharia into the discussion, so go ask the person who did, he still cannot explain.
AJ
quote:
Originally posted by Abu Jihad:
I didn't bring sharia into the discussion, so go ask the person who did, he still cannot explain.


In fairness, Andre's first statement does suggest that the motive is to impose shariah. However he subsequently clarified that shariah was not the cause.

Secondly, D2 is correct that peoples' fear of shariah is valid given all the edicts that comes from 'people of authority' from Saudi Arabia all the way to Muslims in the west.

The reality is that shariah in essence is not in conflict with any law currently in effect in the west. An honest debate of these will highlight their similarities as well as their differences.

I believe that this is what Abu was trying to convey.
FM
quote:
Originally posted by ksazma:
. . . peoples' fear of shariah is valid given all the edicts that comes from 'people of authority' from Saudi Arabia all the way to Muslims in the west.

The reality is that shariah in essence is not in conflict with any law currently in effect in the west.

So, WHO distills this essence for the rest of us . . .??
FM
New York imposed Sharia law on New Years Eve.
Alcohol banned.

quote:
NEW YORK — Less than two weeks after graduating from the New York City police academy, more than 1,500 rookie officers have a daunting first assignment: helping to protect Times Square on New Year's Eve.

The deployment is just one of an array of security measures that the New York Police Department rolls out each year for the event that turns the "Crossroads of the World" into a massive street party that stretches 17 blocks through the heart of Manhattan.

"There will be several thousand police officers involved," said Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, who said there are no specific threats against Times Square.

The usual security is bolstered each New Year's Eve by an army of extra patrol officers who use police barriers to enforce a ban on alcohol...
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×