What product you advertising now? 
Former Member
Former Member
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by JB:
These are well thought out proposals. The PPP cannot even deal with the traffic problems.
Thank you, JB. Well the PPP does have other priorities such as the Marriott and Pradoville II, for example.
And even when they engage in projects that are expected to help the working people they do not. For example, the Berbice Bridge, which prohibits bicylists (school children and the poor could otherwise have ridden over). Prohibiting pedestrians is understandable because of the long stretch of road on the Palmyra side, but that shouldn't stop them from implementing a shuttle bus which could run at a small profit. But such a shuttle system would decrease the returns for the investors in the Berbice Bridge since they would profit more from the mini-buses.
Well said Mr Ramsaroop. They don't have a vision. By the way, my father said your business is making a high quality product.
Thank you
Former Member
Originally Posted by TI:
What product you advertising now?
Lol! If you must know: https://www.facebook.com/pages...ucts/136648253177438
That's in addition to the flowers: https://www.facebook.com/pages...dens/195720543787940
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by JB:
These are well thought out proposals. The PPP cannot even deal with the traffic problems.
Thank you, JB. Well the PPP does have other priorities such as the Marriott and Pradoville II, for example.
And even when they engage in projects that are expected to help the working people they do not. For example, the Berbice Bridge, which prohibits bicylists (school children and the poor could otherwise have ridden over). Prohibiting pedestrians is understandable because of the long stretch of road on the Palmyra side, but that shouldn't stop them from implementing a shuttle bus which could run at a small profit. But such a shuttle system would decrease the returns for the investors in the Berbice Bridge since they would profit more from the mini-buses.
So Mr. Baseman, what do you think about the hardships that is forced upon the people of Berbice and how should they vote next election when the "Blackman" is not the problem?
Former Member
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by JB:
These are well thought out proposals. The PPP cannot even deal with the traffic problems.
Thank you, JB. Well the PPP does have other priorities such as the Marriott and Pradoville II, for example.
And even when they engage in projects that are expected to help the working people they do not. For example, the Berbice Bridge, which prohibits bicylists (school children and the poor could otherwise have ridden over). Prohibiting pedestrians is understandable because of the long stretch of road on the Palmyra side, but that shouldn't stop them from implementing a shuttle bus which could run at a small profit. But such a shuttle system would decrease the returns for the investors in the Berbice Bridge since they would profit more from the mini-buses.
So Mr. Baseman, what do you think about the hardships that is forced upon the people of Berbice and how should they vote next election when the "Blackman" is not the problem?
I support the reduction of the bridge toll, always did always will. However, I do not know of all the debt covenants the GoG is obliged to comply with under the debt write-off agreements.
If I remember well, the AFC was a loud champion of the VAT reduction only to later find out there were more "complexities" than they understood and decided to punt and find another lost cause.
Yugi Vat's happening to the Vat Tax?
Former Member
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by JB:
These are well thought out proposals. The PPP cannot even deal with the traffic problems.
Thank you, JB. Well the PPP does have other priorities such as the Marriott and Pradoville II, for example.
And even when they engage in projects that are expected to help the working people they do not. For example, the Berbice Bridge, which prohibits bicylists (school children and the poor could otherwise have ridden over). Prohibiting pedestrians is understandable because of the long stretch of road on the Palmyra side, but that shouldn't stop them from implementing a shuttle bus which could run at a small profit. But such a shuttle system would decrease the returns for the investors in the Berbice Bridge since they would profit more from the mini-buses.
So Mr. Baseman, what do you think about the hardships that is forced upon the people of Berbice and how should they vote next election when the "Blackman" is not the problem?
I support the reduction of the bridge toll, always did always will. However, I do not know of all the debt covenants the GoG is obliged to comply with under the debt write-off agreements.
If I remember well, the AFC was a loud champion of the VAT reduction only to later find out there were more "complexities" than they understood and decided to punt and find another lost cause.
Vat is a replacement tax system Complaining it is more onerous than the previous one is not a complexity. VAT is supposed to embody simplicity. That is how it has been packaged and sold. If lowering it in any event was a built in flaw then the vendors sold a flawed product...just saying!
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
5,269 online (1 member
/
5,268 guests)