PPP scores a major victory here and this proves that allegations against the PPP were sensationalized while they were in office. KN had a personal vendetta against the PPP and did a good job at selling their stories and many bought into it.

The ball is back into the PNC court to prove allegations of PPP theft and corruption. 

A NY Times article highlighted the fact that the PNC is unable to prove their allegations.

Thank god that Guyana’s court system still works. It has to ensure that the election chairman selection process is clarified.

This is great news for PPP supporters. When will SOCU and SARA bring on more "bad in law" charges against other PPP ministers? Ashni Singh's case will be dismissed too.

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

And now the PNC election slogan of putting all them thieving PPP man and homan in jail as soon they win the election in 2015 has been derailed.  

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

So is the British system. 

I believe Canada justice system is the same as UK. 

A Canadian judge throws out a first- degree murder case because the accused  trial, was delay under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

Buddupp boop buddupp

PNCR continues to take blows for their nonsensical actions. 

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

Judy making some strange ruling lately.Anyway let justice prevail.

DJ, the courts have spoke and have proven that all of these trumped up charges and allegations are what they are, allegations and baseless.

Short man’s case will also be thrown out. The deck of cards will fall on these PNC trumped up allegations. 

Let democracy and independence of the courts continue. Time for the courts to rule on the Chairman of GECOM.

Time to crack down on AFC thieves. 

Django posted:

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

Judy making some strange ruling lately.Anyway let justice prevail.

What you trying to say... you quote the woman name follow through with your comments nah. PPP is NOT the government 

Yes “ a justice prevail” .. what else yo want . Go help them beat a drum at cuffy square. 

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

Judy making some strange ruling lately.Anyway let justice prevail.

What you trying to say... you quote the woman name follow through with your comments nah. PPP is NOT the government 

Yes “ a justice prevail” .. what else yo want . Go help them beat a drum at cuffy square. 

Bhai,check the ruling on some recent cases,you will get an idea what i am talking about.

Django posted:

Dave posted:

Django posted:

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

Judy making some strange ruling lately.Anyway let justice prevail.

What you trying to say... you quote the woman name follow through with your comments nah. PPP is NOT the government 

Yes “ a justice prevail” .. what else yo want . Go help them beat a drum at cuffy square. 

Bhai,check the ruling on some recent cases,you will get an idea what i am talking about.

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

Gilbakka posted:

This is great news for PPP supporters. When will SOCU and SARA bring on more "bad in law" charges against other PPP ministers? Ashni Singh's case will be dismissed too.

Precedence is now established. A lot of cases will be thrown out. You hit the nail on the head regarding Socu and Sara.

The PPP can capitalize and shake the monkey off their backs. 

The next presidential candidate has lots of good things going for him or her. 

The Magistrate explained that according to Guyana’s constitution, Westford was a Government Minister and was not a Public Officer.

Government Ministers are above the law. The laws have to be changed and grand fathered for SOCU or SARA to be successful in it's prosecution.

Ashni will be freed but Brassington was not a member of parliament.  

How come that ministers are above the law? Where is that stated in the constitution? Guyana would be the only country in the western world with such an exemption.

Mitwah posted:

The Magistrate explained that according to Guyana’s constitution, Westford was a Government Minister and was not a Public Officer.

Government Ministers are above the law. The laws have to be changed and grand fathered for SOCU or SARA to be successful in it's prosecution.

Ashni will be freed but Brassington was not a member of parliament.  

 

Mr lawyer I will neva hire you... is that how you interpret the magistrate ruling.

Banna na fallow Guyana esteem attorney general, he will stray you away. 

Mit, the prosecutor fail to provide evidence. 

Guyana police uses slate to record evidence on investigation ... bhai that 4M bail is divided amongs them brilliant cop.

Mr.T posted:

How come that ministers are above the law? Where is that stated in the constitution? Guyana would be the only country in the western world with such an exemption.

Nah follow people, do you research. Is that how you want open million dollar business in Guyana.... and one advise, make sure you in Guyana to run and manage you businesss... I en gat to tell you more, yo hand de bun once by family fo a land... a you tell abye on this site. Good luck .

At the end of the day, the PPP will use this ruling to hammer away at the AFC during LGE. 

President Granger is pressuring them and the PPP will hammer away at the lack of proof of allegations of corruption.

It would be interesting to see how the AFC does at LGE. The AFC can no longer hang on to Grangers coat tail. 

The PPP and PNC will be the big winners at LGE. The knives and forks would be openly used at Congress Place after LGE to carve the AFC. Carib was correct about the knives and forks. 

Politics is funny business. Moses kicked the PPP in a place that hurts and now the PPP will return the favour. 

Granger is grinning from ear to ear.

I am loving all of this political drama as it unfolds.

A lot of these sloppy boys had already tried and convicted ppp of thievery and corruption pre 2015 sans proof. But today they remain silent on similar allegations against PNC due to love for bigan. 

I wonder if there will be an appeal. 

There will be no appeal.

Just asking. Magistrates are known to make errors in their judgements.

Na Bai Mits, there is no mistake here.

Yugi, I don't understand how the DPP approve this one for prosecution and the Prosecutor not proving that money was stolen. You said money talks, bullshit walks. 

Seems as though laws (as every other thing) in Guyana can be manipulated to suit the persons involved.

cain posted:

Seems as though laws (as every other thing) in Guyana can be manipulated to suit the persons involved.

Good, the PNC trumped up charges got thrown out!

Dave posted:

Mr.T posted:

How come that ministers are above the law? Where is that stated in the constitution? Guyana would be the only country in the western world with such an exemption.

Nah follow people, do you research. Is that how you want open million dollar business in Guyana.... and one advise, make sure you in Guyana to run and manage you businesss... I en gat to tell you more, yo hand de bun once by family fo a land... a you tell abye on this site. Good luck .

Good advice.  

Baseman posted:

cain posted:

Seems as though laws (as every other thing) in Guyana can be manipulated to suit the persons involved.

Good, the PNC trumped up charges got thrown out!

The law is not for the rich and powerful. The money is still unaccounted for. 

Mitwah posted:

Baseman posted:

 

Good, the PNC trumped up charges got thrown out!

The law is not for the rich and powerful. The money is still unaccounted for. 

Leff di lil gyaals alone.  Nuff nuff bigger tiefs got away.   Dem gyaals tek lil free fried rice without asking!

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

Is that the best you can come up with ?

Django posted:

Mr.T posted:

Dave posted:

The attorney had argued that the prosecution ignored the lawful meaning of a public officer and proceeded to try a then Minister under an offence which is not established in law.

The courts in Guyana seem to have some strange rulings. The women were not found guilty of not stealing the money, but for the claim that they were not public officers. Very odd ruling. 

Judy making some strange ruling lately.Anyway let justice prevail.

Would this have been a brilliant decision if the two members were PNC card carrying thugs?

Our Bai DJ described the ruling as strange when it was not in favour of the PNC. The court ruled correctly and the AFC is now ducking for cover. They are dead quiet.

yuji22 posted:

Our Bai DJ described the ruling as strange when it was not in favour of the PNC. The court ruled correctly and the AFC is now ducking for cover. They are dead quiet.

Yujji Bai, Djangy is not as bad as Princess Cross your Legs Pusswah.

True.

At least we know where DJ stands but Prince (CYLP) is all over the map and it has been reported and confirmed by a couple of posters that he resents Afro Guyanese.

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

JACKASS, stop writing rubbish because you are evidently nothing but a dunce k-k-hole; completely ignorant of the process by which courts of law function ! Convictions have to be supported by evidence; clear and incontrovertible evidence and in this case there was either none or the evidence presented by the prosecutor was inadequate/inconclusive. Do remember that it is better to keep your trap shut and let others think you are an ass than to open it and remove all doubt ! Can you confirm that the judge in this case was appointed by the PPP and that the ruling  was a consequence of his/her appointment ? What about judges who were appointed during the tenure of the big KaKa Burnham ?

Keffer posted:

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

JACKASS, stop writing rubbish because you are evidently nothing but a dunce k-k-hole; completely ignorant of the process by which courts of law function !

I see the half cow, half human show up.

Mr.T posted:

Keffer posted:

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

JACKASS, stop writing rubbish because you are evidently nothing but a dunce k-k-hole; completely ignorant of the process by which courts of law function !

I see the half cow, half human show up.

Then close your eyes, crawl back into your hole and hibernate again .... for a loooong time !

Keffer posted:

Mr.T posted:

Keffer posted:

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

JACKASS, stop writing rubbish because you are evidently nothing but a dunce k-k-hole; completely ignorant of the process by which courts of law function !

I see the half cow, half human show up.

Then close your eyes, crawl back into your hole and hibernate again .... for a loooong time !

Is why you get a hard on every time you see me on GNI?

Mr.T posted:

Keffer posted:

Mr.T posted:

And it's all judges appointed under the PPP who are acquitting these PPP criminals. Is only PNC criminals get locked up, unless it is a case of murder.

JACKASS, stop writing rubbish because you are evidently nothing but a dunce k-k-hole; completely ignorant of the process by which courts of law function !

I see the half cow, half human show up.

Then you are evidently on something ....you need help; psychiatric help !