Skip to main content

Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by KishanB:

.

This is what Granja has to apologise for, not for himself but for his party that denied Guyana Walter Rodney.

 

 

And when can we expect the PPP to apologize for its own role in creating Guyana's problems?  You do know that the PPP was very upset when Rodney began talking to sugar workers.  In their opinion Rodney was to take away black support from the PNC, but to leave their Indian supporters alone.

 

So where was the PPP in creating cross ethnic alliances?

 

Why should it be only the PNC (black people) who should apologize?

kARI started this thread about the PNC. We will deal with the PPP, as far as I am concerned they need to do more than apologizing, some of them ought to be in jail.

 

Race has certainly blind some of you. How the hell an apology by the PNC is apology from blacks to Indians?

Chief

Had a nice day in Brooklyn earlier and returned to a lost of contributions but basically more of the same. I haven't seen much original thought, except those of Kzaz and Chief, and KishanB. Jalil made a good point about the PPP missing a golden opportunity to reach out to Nagamootoo prior to the last elections, which I know is anathema to Jagdeo.

 

I'm heartened that there were no cuss-downs - thank Nehru for not making this important thread one to get the Admin's attention and thus the padlock was kept in their pockets (I must say I laughed at the post about the thread's IQ dropping 20% when Nehru made his first comment ).

 

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

Nehru, you also make the assertion that once a thug always a thug. Any allusion on my part that this is not your daddy's PNC draws the incorrect inference that I do not know slo-fiah, mo-fiah will emerge. I ask you to look at the reality of protests in Guyana in this day and age and see if that incentive still holds.

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

Kari
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 . . . Granger cannot want to head of the PNC and say it was okay to use the army to murder people just to steal an election.

chief, u are a big man . . . there is no need for the cheap lie to make a lameass point

 

no damn different than baseman and his sick nonsense about PNC "enslaving" Indo-Guyanese

 

y'all something else . . .

Its' on record my friend.

Chief
Originally Posted by Kari:

Had a nice day in Brooklyn earlier and returned to a lost of contributions but basically more of the same. I haven't seen much original thought, except those of Kzaz and Chief, and KishanB. Jalil made a good point about the PPP missing a golden opportunity to reach out to Nagamootoo prior to the last elections, which I know is anathema to Jagdeo.

 

I'm heartened that there were no cuss-downs - thank Nehru for not making this important thread one to get the Admin's attention and thus the padlock was kept in their pockets (I must say I laughed at the post about the thread's IQ dropping 20% when Nehru made his first comment ).

 

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

Nehru, you also make the assertion that once a thug always a thug. Any allusion on my part that this is not your daddy's PNC draws the incorrect inference that I do not know slo-fiah, mo-fiah will emerge. I ask you to look at the reality of protests in Guyana in this day and age and see if that incentive still holds.

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

dude, when u want a proper response from me  . . . address me and my ideas directly

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies . . . it's cowardly

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:

chief, it's ok if u find it convenient to conflate me with caribny to further your lameass polemic

 

what i will NOT let u do unchallenged is to LIE thru your teeth to further your retrograde tribal agenda masquerading as support for inclusiveness and democracy

 

in my previous post, i asked 'why the lie'? . . . you've run away like a bloody coward

Chief never run I am reading from the top coming down.

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 . . . Granger cannot want to head of the PNC and say it was okay to use the army to murder people just to steal an election.

chief, u are a big man . . . there is no need for the cheap lie to make a lameass point

 

no damn different than baseman and his sick nonsense about PNC "enslaving" Indo-Guyanese

 

y'all something else . . .

Its' on record my friend.

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

Yo hold your horses, STOP THE PERSONAL ABUSE.

Why are you behaving in such disgusting manner?

 

Granger is on record saying that there is nothing to apologize for the GDF actions during the 1973 elections.

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

Yo hold your horses, STOP THE PERSONAL ABUSE.

Why are you behaving in such disgusting manner?

 

Granger is on record saying that there is nothing to apologize for the GDF actions during the 1973 elections.

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

Chief
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

Whatever comforts you.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

Whatever comforts you.

uh uh . . . yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwn

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Kari:
-----------------------

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

-----------------------

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

dude, when u want a proper response from me  . . . address me and my ideas directly

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies . . . it's cowardly

....address me and my ideas directly

 

??????????????

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies

 

?????????????????

 

 

Hey Stormy, you have competition in the most inane posts on GNI

Kari

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×