Skip to main content

Prologue

Mark Cuban talks about walking on the other side of the road when seeing a black youth with a hoodie in the darkness of night. You then hear the retort that a white guy in a suit can be more harmful as well as a white bald-headed dude with a tattoo. We are all too familiar with racial distrust because of unfamiliarity, and the Korean/Black stand-off in LA and New York in the 80s is a case in point. Then of course Indians with Turbans felt it just after 9/11.

 

The point is that when we are unfamiliar with something we tend to have an instinctual distrust until we become familiar with it. Likewise we overcome skepticism with change once we experience it.

 

The problem with the PNC brand

Indians say that the PNC will revert to Burnham days when they hear the acronym APNU, and this is the case with unfamiliarity. Not that Indians are unfamiliar with the PNC, but unfamiliar with CHANGE within the PNC. The brand is toxic – both to Indians as well as Blacks. Winning Blacks is not the problem. It is winning over Indians. Indians will continue to distrust the APNU as long as they are unfamiliar with the new PNC and they are skeptical about the change in the PNC.

 

The PNC’s leadership issue

You either believe that Robert Corbin sold out the PNC’s change to Jagdeo’s charm offensive or he buckled under the relentless pressure of the FF/Phantom reality. You must know that a force for change Winston Murray was cut short early. Enter Granger.

 

David Granger is a decent man. He was a low-level officer during the 1973 elections. I trained as a QC Cadet at Timehri in the summer of 1973 and my recollection may be bad, but I believe he was stationed there. I also know that the low-level officer level had a disconnect with the upper Brass in Burnham’s clutches. He is a QC Old Boy and has a strong intellectual tradition. He is not a thug, to use the parlance of some on this GNI Board.

 

The PPP Free Pass

I believe that with a strong Opposition the PPP will be a better party – visionary leadership, professionalism and a flourish for technology, all of which a re lacking. We accept mediocrity because of a distrust of an opposition brand that refuses to have a do-over.

Hoyte had a wonderful opportunity. His trust of Indian professionals and Indian economic ethic was already recognized. All he had to do was to apologize to the country as a whole – to Blacks for impoverishing them, and to Indians for the denial of certain freedoms and to the country as a whole for bankrupting the economy. Hee demurred. Corbin was bought over. Granger needs the cahones to compliment his nice character and professionalism.

Here’s the rub. The PNC is not monolithic. There are factional rivalries. Hoyte may have been thrown out of the PNC, even after banishing Hammy Green. Oh, how little did Hoyte capitalize on the economic liberalism, freedom from the Burnham shackles and the lethal assault on the kick-down-0the-door banditry.

Granger can call on liberals in the party – like Carl Greenidge, himself a respected Economist – to rebrand the PNC. Maybe internal PNC politics dooms APNU.

 

Meanwhile Jagdeo grasped the PPP by the scruff of the neck while Moses was on sabbatical – forced and unforced – and remade the PPP. He can make the PPP an autocratic, oligopolistic party and stifle economic advancement, and he gets a free pass. The PNC guarantees that.

 

Granger's visit to Richmond Hil

Yesterday I couldn’t make time to see Granger at Ritchie Rich or the private dinner later – had other pressing commitments. We have come a long way where any Guyanese can go to any political party function abroad and not be vilified. Of course there are those antiquarian folks on this Board who would demonize anyone  who would think of doing that – but they are a vanishing majority. From the feedback I’ve gotten so far, the point was made to Granger that his ROI (Return on Investment) for reaching out to the Indian polity will not pay dividends until the PNC apologizes to the nation – to Blacks, Indians, Indigenous and other races. The PPP needs this investment Granger. It will make them a better party. Heck, we may even have a governing party and Presidency other than the reckless meandering one we are forced to subscribe to.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Nehru

The PNC need to apologize for their past sins.

 

I stayed away from the event yesterday because I feel that Granger need to come clean and express remorse with his role and the role of the GDF in robbing Guyanese the right to an elective Government.

 

I heard Vishnu Mahadeo was in attendace hopefully he can fill us in with what Mr Granger had to say.

Chief

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

What you have said above is the trap almost every Guyanese is caught in HENCE THE STAGNATION OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM IN GUYANA.

 

We are speaking about the PNC here so leave the PPP out of this. Many of us including Kari are concerned about the well being of a major political party that can make a difference in the future of our beloved Guyana. I am saying that in order for the mass public to take the PNC seerriously they need to come clean and trust me that will give them an edge in any elections.

Chief
Last edited by Chief
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi, the PNC HASN'T changed in the eyes of Guyanese. What has changed is the reality on the ground that Indian businesses have private armies and they have more firepower than slo-fiah, mo-fiah can conjure up. That fight is over with. The PNC has no ability to relive the 60s, 70s and 80s. That's why their whole existence has changed organically. Given that they have to rebrand themselves to what they are today. They are not that monster living in your mind. That's the reality I speak of and the PPP will continue to not give its best as long as they can get away with the general mistrust of the PNC. Ii would like to see government up its game, whether its the PPP or the PNC or AFC or whomever. That is not happening because the PNC seems determined to make folks like you Pavi think they are the PNC of the the Burnham era.

Kari
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

Chief said it well. The adversarial position of yours Redux is not helpful to your cause, which is the same as ours (people like Chief and myself). You're fighting the PPP with inadequate tools. As long as the PNC remains the object like it is in the minds of Nehru, Cobra, etc. the PPP wins forever.

 

You have to get out of the PPP-demonizing role alone. That will not give you the ROI on your emotional and intellectual investment. It is not helping the AFC as well to know that the PNC is undermining their effort. The PPP has the upper hand as long as we're in this mindset and they're laughing all the way to the bank, lirterally.

Kari
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

What you have said above is the trap almost every Guyanese is caught in.

 

We are speaking about the PNC here so leave the PPP out of this. Many of us including Kari are concerned about the well being of a major political party that can make a difference in the future of our beloved Guyana.   

more nonsense

 

it is y'all who have designed and, as we see today, carefully prune & cultivate the "trap"

 

let me be clear . . . what y'all are really calling for is an apology by Afro-Guyanese to Indo-Guyanese and, given our history, THAT is truly offensive!

 

and, as to "leave the PPP out of this" . . . u have clean lost your freakin mind!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Kari:

Chief said it well. The adversarial position of yours Redux is not helpful to your cause, which is the same as ours (people like Chief and myself). You're fighting the PPP with inadequate tools. As long as the PNC remains the object like it is in the minds of Nehru, Cobra, etc. the PPP wins forever.

 

You have to get out of the PPP-demonizing role alone. That will not give you the ROI on your emotional and intellectual investment. It is not helping the AFC as well to know that the PNC is undermining their effort. The PPP has the upper hand as long as we're in this mindset and they're laughing all the way to the bank, lirterally.

Nice one Kari!!!

Chief
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi  I am no Miss cleo BUT you seem to think you have all the answers and know it all.

How helpful is this?

Karhee, I asked you I believe two simple questions and you are telling me what you think I believe. Very helpful indeed.  You need to Gotay before you hit the rice.:::::::

Nehru
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Chief
Originally Posted by Kari:

 We have come a long way where any Guyanese can go to any political party function abroad and not be vilified.

Only because we don't live anymore in that PNC tight gripped environment of old.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

What you have said above is the trap almost every Guyanese is caught in.

 

We are speaking about the PNC here so leave the PPP out of this. Many of us including Kari are concerned about the well being of a major political party that can make a difference in the future of our beloved Guyana.   

more nonsense

 

it is y'all who have designed and 'created' the "trap"

 

let me be clear . . . what y'all are really calling for is an apology by Afro-Guyanese to Indo-Guyanese and, given our history, THAT is truly offensive!

 

and, as to "leave the PPP out of this" . . . u have clean lost your freakin mind!

So be it!!!

 

You are subscribing to  the cruel cycle of " It's awwee time now"

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

What you have said above is the trap almost every Guyanese is caught in.

 

We are speaking about the PNC here so leave the PPP out of this. Many of us including Kari are concerned about the well being of a major political party that can make a difference in the future of our beloved Guyana.   

more nonsense

 

it is y'all who have designed and, as we see today, carefully prune & cultivate the "trap"

 

let me be clear . . . what y'all are really calling for is an apology by Afro-Guyanese to Indo-Guyanese and, given our history, THAT is truly offensive!

 

and, as to "leave the PPP out of this" . . . u have clean lost your freakin mind!

So be it!!!

 

You are subscribing to  the cruel cycle of " It's awwee time now"

please explain how i'm "subscribing" to that!

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

crude sophistry . . . look it up

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi, the PNC HASN'T changed in the eyes of Guyanese. What has changed is the reality on the ground that Indian businesses have private armies and they have more firepower than slo-fiah, mo-fiah can conjure up. That fight is over with. The PNC has no ability to relive the 60s, 70s and 80s. That's why their whole existence has changed organically. Given that they have to rebrand themselves to what they are today. They are not that monster living in your mind. That's the reality I speak of and the PPP will continue to not give its best as long as they can get away with the general mistrust of the PNC. Ii would like to see government up its game, whether its the PPP or the PNC or AFC or whomever. That is not happening because the PNC seems determined to make folks like you Pavi think they are the PNC of the the Burnham era.

Only because they don't have the upper hand now. The last time they had it, they took over even the British people businesses. Who is to say they wouldn't resort to nationalizing these private businesses again. Unfortunately, the PNC don't have a good track record.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

i suppose because he is blackman . . . nah su bai?

 

undiluted tribal cant, without even the 'normal' pretensions to reason, belief in a social contract, democracy, etc

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi, the PNC HASN'T changed in the eyes of Guyanese. What has changed is the reality on the ground that Indian businesses have private armies and they have more firepower than slo-fiah, mo-fiah can conjure up. That fight is over with. The PNC has no ability to relive the 60s, 70s and 80s. That's why their whole existence has changed organically. Given that they have to rebrand themselves to what they are today. They are not that monster living in your mind. That's the reality I speak of and the PPP will continue to not give its best as long as they can get away with the general mistrust of the PNC. Ii would like to see government up its game, whether its the PPP or the PNC or AFC or whomever. That is not happening because the PNC seems determined to make folks like you Pavi think they are the PNC of the the Burnham era.

Only because they don't have the upper hand now. The last time they had it, they took over even the British people businesses. Who is to say they wouldn't resort to nationalizing these private businesses again. Unfortunately, the PNC don't have a good track record.

beyond cant . . . wandering into illogic, hysteria, low-minded race baiting and ignorance now

 

Kari and Chief, please come in

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

crude sophistry . . . look it up

No need to make anything up about the record of the PNC. You may wish for a PNC redux but you would be a fool to deny their history. However, you are free to do so.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

Kzaaaz, I'm reminded of the disclaimer on commercials for stock brokers "past behavior is not a good predictor of future performance".

 

Your point about it being easier for trust to be given to the PNC than it resorting to bad behavior is true and I agree. But the alternative is to accept that the PPP is going great guns - something that a whole lotta Guyanese living in impoverishment won't agree with. So it's a risk, just like in business you have to take risks before you get returns. You have to ask what mitigating circumstances are there with a PNC in government reverting to bad behavior. This is the 21st century with instant communications and a flatter world, and with civilians possessing arms. The 60s, 70s and 80s ain't gon happen again. Putin for instance may give hope to those who want to destroy this argument, but he will not even venture beyond Crimea. So I don't see the PNC government banning flour and peas, destroying the private sector, and putting all those trade restrictions and destroying freedom of the press (heck the PPP is doing a good job with the economic means of owning media nad press in "Guyna all by themselves).

Kari
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

crude sophistry . . . look it up

No need to make anything up about the record of the PNC. You may wish for a PNC redux but you would be a fool to deny their history. However, you are free to do so.

fool, look up the word . . . arite?

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

i suppose because he is blackman . . . nah su bai?

 

undiluted tribal cant, without even the 'normal' pretensions to reason, belief in a social contract, democracy, etc

The black man of the PNC era could have presented himself differently but chose the one that is distrustful to many. You can chose to put that burden on me but that would be your own delusion.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi, the PNC HASN'T changed in the eyes of Guyanese. What has changed is the reality on the ground that Indian businesses have private armies and they have more firepower than slo-fiah, mo-fiah can conjure up. That fight is over with. The PNC has no ability to relive the 60s, 70s and 80s. That's why their whole existence has changed organically. Given that they have to rebrand themselves to what they are today. They are not that monster living in your mind. That's the reality I speak of and the PPP will continue to not give its best as long as they can get away with the general mistrust of the PNC. Ii would like to see government up its game, whether its the PPP or the PNC or AFC or whomever. That is not happening because the PNC seems determined to make folks like you Pavi think they are the PNC of the the Burnham era.

Only because they don't have the upper hand now. The last time they had it, they took over even the British people businesses. Who is to say they wouldn't resort to nationalizing these private businesses again. Unfortunately, the PNC don't have a good track record.

beyond cant . . . wandering into illogic, hysteria, low-minded race baiting and ignorance now

 

Kari and Chief, please come in

As usual, it doesn't take long for you to get emotionally out of control. You may be able to extend your lifespan if you avoid discussions that are out of your league. You sound old and crotchety again.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 We have come a long way where any Guyanese can go to any political party function abroad and not be vilified.

Only because we don't live anymore in that PNC tight gripped environment of old.

No Kzaaaz we live in the 21st century. Let's go back to the future. It's 1973 and the PNC tries to rig to elections. First of all the GDF soldiers deployed in Indian neighborhoods will have to fear their camp will be overrun. They know that their actions will be on the Internet. The International community will have observers in the country. Ban flour? You will see that in all Guyanese homes. There are too many Guyanese living abroad and too many routes established.

 

why are we building this fear of a PNC monster? Or a Blackman monster? Get out of your collective intellectual stupor and see reality. Say we want no Blackman a President and a Black party ruling. You'll get more traction that way and we'll all hold a hawan and quranic reading for the exalted PPP./

Kari
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

such nonsense

 

where is the reciprocal call for a PPP "apology"?

 

one remembers Raphael Trotman apologizing . . . where is the dividend?

 

for y'all . . . this man of mixed race remains eternal blackman, eternal PNC, eternally cursed, unfit!

 

spare me the apology foolishness which only seems to interest those PPP 'clever' bais of a certain age making sure that the PNC-as-bogeyman flame burns brightly for a generation of Indians who knew not Burnham . . . and otherwise couldn't care less

What you have said above is the trap almost every Guyanese is caught in.

 

We are speaking about the PNC here so leave the PPP out of this. Many of us including Kari are concerned about the well being of a major political party that can make a difference in the future of our beloved Guyana.   

more nonsense

 

it is y'all who have designed and 'created' the "trap"

 

let me be clear . . . what y'all are really calling for is an apology by Afro-Guyanese to Indo-Guyanese and, given our history, THAT is truly offensive!

 

and, as to "leave the PPP out of this" . . . u have clean lost your freakin mind!

So be it!!!

 

You are subscribing to  the cruel cycle of " It's awwee time now"

Very succinct....well put.

Kari
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

crude sophistry . . . look it up

No need to make anything up about the record of the PNC. You may wish for a PNC redux but you would be a fool to deny their history. However, you are free to do so.

fool, look up the word . . . arite?

For now, you should go take your meds. Make sure there is a truth serum included. And also one for your black this coolie that obsession.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

I hope Redux read this response.

The Guyanese people need reassurance .

 

Ksa the younger generation of Guyanese who are witnessing the wholesale thieving by the PPP WILL EVENTUALLY have the same fears.

Even I am not pleased with the actions of the PPP Chief but one thing has been constant since 1992. They have not denied any party the free right to replace them in government. The PNC record is the opposite.

crude sophistry . . . look it up

Good one Redux....the irony is not misplaced. I've gotten anecdotes of PPP malfeasance come elections.

Kari
Last edited by Kari
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Kari, Have you seen the behavior, attitudes and actions of the PNC on the Streets and in Parliament over the last few years??  What exactly makes the PNC a NEW, moral, caring and compassionate Group?? Is there something you are aware of that the rest of us are missing?  I asked these questions because many, many of us ARE aware of the PNC conduct and behavior both on the Streets and in Parliament.

Far from what you think I believe in Pavi, the PNC HASN'T changed in the eyes of Guyanese. What has changed is the reality on the ground that Indian businesses have private armies and they have more firepower than slo-fiah, mo-fiah can conjure up. That fight is over with. The PNC has no ability to relive the 60s, 70s and 80s. That's why their whole existence has changed organically. Given that they have to rebrand themselves to what they are today. They are not that monster living in your mind. That's the reality I speak of and the PPP will continue to not give its best as long as they can get away with the general mistrust of the PNC. Ii would like to see government up its game, whether its the PPP or the PNC or AFC or whomever. That is not happening because the PNC seems determined to make folks like you Pavi think they are the PNC of the the Burnham era.

Only because they don't have the upper hand now. The last time they had it, they took over even the British people businesses. Who is to say they wouldn't resort to nationalizing these private businesses again. Unfortunately, the PNC don't have a good track record.

Kzaaaz get out of the last century. Russia will invade Poland right?

Kari
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

David Granger is a decent man.

So was Burnham before the power made him take advantage of others. One cannot assume that Granger wouldn't become another Burnham.

You asked in the title "When will the PNC gain the trust of Guyanese" I say that it is easier for Guyanese to give the PNC their trust than it is for the PNC to not resort to their old antics once given that power.

i suppose because he is blackman . . . nah su bai?

 

undiluted tribal cant, without even the 'normal' pretensions to reason, belief in a social contract, democracy, etc

The black man of the PNC era could have presented himself differently but chose the one that is distrustful to many. You can chose to put that burden on me but that would be your own delusion.

You're making my point Kzaaz. The Black responded to the PNC tribally the same way Indians would to the PPP - because of the fear and mistrust. That's the cycle we intelligent people in the 21st century are trying to break out of. Obama won in 2008 by good Americans breaking out of a certain mentality. Maybe we will - emigration of Indians, demographic change, continued squalor amidst pockets of garrulous riches.

Kari
I was present in an official capacity - President of Richmond Hill Economic Development Council.
 
We welcomed APNU to Richmond Hill, the epicenter of the Guyanese worldwide
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

The PNC need to apologize for their past sins.

 

I stayed away from the event yesterday because I feel that Granger need to come clean and express remorse with his role and the role of the GDF in robbing Guyanese the right to an elective Government.

 

I heard Vishnu Mahadeo was in attendace hopefully he can fill us in with what Mr Granger had to say.

 

Vish M
Originally Posted by Kari:
 

Kzaaaz, I'm reminded of the disclaimer on commercials for stock brokers "past behavior is not a good predictor of future performance".

 

Your point about it being easier for trust to be given to the PNC than it resorting to bad behavior is true and I agree. But the alternative is to accept that the PPP is going great guns - something that a whole lotta Guyanese living in impoverishment won't agree with. So it's a risk, just like in business you have to take risks before you get returns. You have to ask what mitigating circumstances are there with a PNC in government reverting to bad behavior. This is the 21st century with instant communications and a flatter world, and with civilians possessing arms. The 60s, 70s and 80s ain't gon happen again. Putin for instance may give hope to those who want to destroy this argument, but he will not even venture beyond Crimea. So I don't see the PNC government banning flour and peas, destroying the private sector, and putting all those trade restrictions and destroying freedom of the press (heck the PPP is doing a good job with the economic means of owning media nad press in "Guyna all by themselves).

And this is why I am on record as wanting a representative government in Guyana. Check my posts around the 2011 elections. There was hope for a balanced government with the infusion of the AFC. Unfortunately, the AFC by proxy joined with APNU to stifle the PPP. They would have been more useful had they become bargaining partners for all by 'you give us this, we give you that'. So the experiment did not work. And I am not yet ready for a return of a ruling PNC government. And that is all due to their past actions.

FM
Originally Posted by Vish M:
I was present in an official capacity - President of Richmond Hill Economic Development Council.
 
We welcomed APNU to Richmond Hill, the epicenter of the Guyanese worldwide
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

The PNC need to apologize for their past sins.

 

I stayed away from the event yesterday because I feel that Granger need to come clean and express remorse with his role and the role of the GDF in robbing Guyanese the right to an elective Government.

 

I heard Vishnu Mahadeo was in attendace hopefully he can fill us in with what Mr Granger had to say.

 

Richmond Hill, the epicenter of the Guyanese worldwide

 

Vish, you've been to Flatbush and Church. Why make an assertion like that?

 

Anyhow I'll have to call you as I've been provided by credible sources of an attempt yesterday championed by you that is below par. I'll explain.

Vish

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
 

Kzaaaz get out of the last century.

I have. Unfortunately I don't think the PNC have. That is their burden. I have no obligation to trust anyone I feel don't deserve that trust.

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Kari:

Chief said it well. The adversarial position of yours Redux is not helpful to your cause, which is the same as ours (people like Chief and myself). You're fighting the PPP with inadequate tools. As long as the PNC remains the object like it is in the minds of Nehru, Cobra, etc. the PPP wins forever.

 

You have to get out of the PPP-demonizing role alone. That will not give you the ROI on your emotional and intellectual investment. It is not helping the AFC as well to know that the PNC is undermining their effort. The PPP has the upper hand as long as we're in this mindset and they're laughing all the way to the bank, lirterally.

Nice one Kari!!!

alyuh two disappoint me [i really didn't think it was possible]

 

soo . . . cobra/nerhu and other GNI posters devoid of politics and infected with the incurable beast of racism need to be 'catered to' for democratic change to become a reality in Guyana . . . seriously?

 

reversing evolution and bringing ignorant knuckle-draggers along is a bridge too far for me

 

that's not why i post here

 

smh

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
 

Kzaaaz, I'm reminded of the disclaimer on commercials for stock brokers "past behavior is not a good predictor of future performance".

 

Your point about it being easier for trust to be given to the PNC than it resorting to bad behavior is true and I agree. But the alternative is to accept that the PPP is going great guns - something that a whole lotta Guyanese living in impoverishment won't agree with. So it's a risk, just like in business you have to take risks before you get returns. You have to ask what mitigating circumstances are there with a PNC in government reverting to bad behavior. This is the 21st century with instant communications and a flatter world, and with civilians possessing arms. The 60s, 70s and 80s ain't gon happen again. Putin for instance may give hope to those who want to destroy this argument, but he will not even venture beyond Crimea. So I don't see the PNC government banning flour and peas, destroying the private sector, and putting all those trade restrictions and destroying freedom of the press (heck the PPP is doing a good job with the economic means of owning media nad press in "Guyna all by themselves).

And this is why I am on record as wanting a representative government in Guyana. Check my posts around the 2011 elections. There was hope for a balanced government with the infusion of the AFC. Unfortunately, the AFC by proxy joined with APNU to stifle the PPP. They would have been more useful had they become bargaining partners for all by 'you give us this, we give you that'. So the experiment did not work. And I am not yet ready for a return of a ruling PNC government. And that is all due to their past actions.

Let's not be naive Kzaaz. The PPP of Jagdeo wanted no part of a Ramjaaataaan (to borrow Nehru's intonation) AFC. You have to live in Guyana to understand these political dynamics. I don't live there but I know how to parse the tea leaves when people talk to me.

Kari

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×