Skip to main content

The main reason why Indian indentured immigrant numbers rose in the years after 1886 and the utter inhumanity behind it.

‘When an El Nino drought destituted the farmers of the Deccan plateau in 1876 there was a net surplus of rice and wheat in India. But the viceroy, Lord Lytton, insisted that nothing should prevent its export to England. In 1877 and 1878, at height of the famine, grain merchants... exported a record 6.4 million hundredweight of wheat.

As the peasants began to starve, government officials were ordered “to discourage relief works in every possible way”. The Anti-Charitable Contributions Act of 1877 prohibited “at the pain of imprisonment private relief donations that potentially interfered with the market fixing of grain prices.” The only relief permitted in most districts was hard labour, from which anyone in an advanced state of starvation was turned away. Within the labour camps, the workers were given less food than the inmates of Buchenwald. In 1877, monthly mortality in the camps equated to an annual death rate of 94%.

As millions died, the imperial government launched “a militarized campaign to collect the tax arrears accumulated during the drought.” The money, which ruined those who might otherwise have survived the famine, was used by Lytton to fund his war in Afghanistan. Even in places which had produced a crop surplus, the government’s export policies, like Stalin’s in the Ukraine, manufactured hunger. In the North-western provinces, Oud and the Punjab, which had brought in record harvests in the preceding three years, at least 1.25m died.

Quoted from:
http://mswithacause.blogspot.com/2012/06/sickened-by-muslim-council-of-britains.html#!/2012/06/sickened-by-muslim-council-of-britains.html
See More

 

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

That's the way life was meant to be. If the Indians were advanced in exploring and exploiting wealth in foreign lands, the white men would have been slaves under Indians rule. We have to accept life at face value and move on without claiming preparation for our enslavement.

FM

What make the Britons looks cruel is when Indians shows weakness. Indians were non-violence people that would turn the other cheek. They made them- selves prime candidate for slavery. Who wouldn't want to take advantage of people's weakness?

 

TI: Muslims should not be allowed to sneeze even when black pepper poured into their nostrils. That is unjustified in a civil world.

FM

Abidha most people are victim oriented they cannot accept what was and is when they are not and cannot be in control . But I agree with your posts. The Aghan Sikhs & Pathans fought every invader tooth and nail . Nepal was never invaded or ruled because of the Gurkas who defended with life and limb. The people of the Indian subcontinent were beaten before the english landed . Look at Guyana where they are in the numerical majority and got their asses kicked !

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×