Putting Nagamootoo as the APNU/AFC Presidential Candidate is sheer pragmatism
Dear Editor,
Putting Mr. Moses Nagamootoo as the Presidential Candidate for the coalition between APNU and AFC is sheer pragmatism and if this is not recognized by those who would like to see the back of the PPP/C Government, then we are doomed with the PPP/C back in office, with all that entails, and all the sensitivities intact, whether African or otherwise.
Mr. Nagamootoo is not the leader of the AFC and if the leader of the AFC, himself an East Indian, has stood himself down, and put Mr. Nagamootoo forward, that in itself indicates that there is some strategy at work here. Mr. Nagamootoo is not only a grassroots politician par excellence, he was among the most popular PPP men, consistently getting the highest number of votes in the PPP’s Congress elections. His name reverberates in the Corentyne among the ordinary people. With him at the head gives the coalition the best chance of bringing that critical percentage of disenchanted PPP supporters over to the coalition, otherwise they stay home and do not vote.
Think of the AFC’s position also; if the coalition were to go with an African leader and fails to get the needed majority, it would sound the death knell of the AFC. It would lose its identity, since it would not be able to extricate itself and become a party of any consequence again.
Editor, all that is wrong in Guyana today is a result of a bad constitution left after 28 years by two black leaders (think of E.I sensitivities then) and for 23 years worked by three East Indians leaders. None of these leaders, past and present, has seen it fit to make significant changes to the electoral system or even to practise issue-based rather than race-based politics. Hence we are where we are.
The present Guyana Constitution aids and abets this situation by imposing a Presidential system of Government on an already established Parliamentary system that ensures that the party with the highest number of votes gets the presidency (and the cabinet) even if that Party does not attain over 50% of the votes. Hence, the minority government of the day. This is wrong. All over the world Parties are able to coalesce after an election to form a government. The PNC itself did this in 1964 where it joined with the UF after the election and became the pre independence government.
Had this prescription not been removed from the constitution, APNU and the AFC could/should have been the government of the day with their combined one seat majority. Instead here they are battling it out before an election to face the electorate as one party.
Editor, my advice to the Negotiating Committee is: be pragmatic and do what is best to get over the hurdle of this election and a new government in office with a promise to the people of a new Constitution within one year of coming into office. All the nitty-gritty of who gets what Ministry could be sorted out after the election. Let the AFC lead the Coalition.
(Name withheld)