The folks listed as defectors are inconsequential as they didn't bring any votes or supporters to the party. TK,the most prominent of the lot, is a failed economist relegated to teaching at a second rate university. They neither brought supporter nor are they taking any supporters to the PNC. ahahahh
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
What did Burnham offer you? You were a PNC supporter, Soup Drinker.
Mitt, I was never a Burnham supporter and will never be. Burnham say you got to be born a PNC, you just cannot become a PNC. God bless me with a brain and I use it wisely.
The AFC has been broken into a thousand pieces, shattered by corruption and conflict of interest, the AFC short stay in the limelight are over...
Khemraj Ramjattan:
AFC Leader, Khemraj Ramjattan expressed disappointment at the move, saying that while he was unaware of discontent in his party, bla, bla, bla.
He was also unaware of Nigel & Cathy Hughes conflict of interest, but he chose to defend them with his last breath of lies. If you don't know what is going in your party, then why be a leader? Well, Mr. Ramjattan there is more to come, and you will still be unaware. Your new name should beunderwear.
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
Cheddi didn't tell you?
I personally know/knew Balram Singh Rai.
I wonder why he didn't tell you then.
Because he was a PNC stooge at that time, slurping soup from the Kabaka's trough.
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
Cheddi didn't tell you?
I personally know/knew Balram Singh Rai.
I wonder why he didn't tell you then.
Because he was a PNC stooge at that time, slurping soup from the Kabaka's trough.
You need to change your name from God to Devil. Rai will never stoop to your or the PNC level. He was a principled man unlike you. So shut you stink mouth and go likk Granger BT lil bit. I know that you like Butta.
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
Cheddi didn't tell you?
I personally know/knew Balram Singh Rai.
I wonder why he didn't tell you then.
Because he was a PNC stooge at that time, slurping soup from the Kabaka's trough.
You need to change your name from God to Devil. Rai will never stoop to your or the PNC level. He was a principled man unlike you. So shut you stink mouth and go likk Granger BT lil bit. I know that you like Butta.
I'm not talking about Rai. D_G was the PNC stooge. You need to be up to date with what happens around here if you're going to participate. Like you lick Granger BT before since you know what's in there.
THERE IS NOT A BIGGER BUNCH OF SCUMBAGS THAN THOSE IN THE kfc. SHOULD I NAME THEM?????????????
The King of the stupids had his piece.
I wonder why they cchose APNU over the PPP/C?
Did it ever cross your mind that PPP don't need traitors and rejects from the AFC? They chose APNU because only APNU will accept AFC outdated economists. Don't jump on the PPP. This is not their problem. This is AFC problem. When it all said and done, only Moses and Ramjattan will be left for you to glorify.
Even canecuttters who traditionally voted for the PPP is giving them the Larwah! They are turning to the AFC. Why?
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
Cheddi didn't tell you?
I personally know/knew Balram Singh Rai.
I wonder why he didn't tell you then.
Because he was a PNC stooge at that time, slurping soup from the Kabaka's trough.
You need to change your name from God to Devil. Rai will never stoop to your or the PNC level. He was a principled man unlike you. So shut you stink mouth and go likk Granger BT lil bit. I know that you like Butta.
LOL! Dada, he is talking about D-G. You missed it.
Please tell me what Rai said to Forbes Burnham when he Kabaka offered him any cabinet position he wanted?
Forbes Burnham never offered a cabinet position to Balram Singh Rai.
Cheddi didn't tell you?
I personally know/knew Balram Singh Rai.
I wonder why he didn't tell you then.
Because he was a PNC stooge at that time, slurping soup from the Kabaka's trough.
You need to change your name from God to Devil. Rai will never stoop to your or the PNC level. He was a principled man unlike you. So shut you stink mouth and go likk Granger BT lil bit. I know that you like Butta.
LOL! Dada, he is talking about D-G. You missed it.
OK Mitts - Point taken. Thanks.
Khemraj Ramjattan had issues with the PPP and he bolted. Somehow Granger must have convinced thse idiots that APNU would win the next election, just as Ramjattan had convinced them that the AFC was going to win in 2011.
This must be a strategic move to get AFC on board with APNU to secure a win in the next election. If AFC intends to stay independent, it may be the same as today gridlock if the PPP loses the parliament again.
This must be a strategic move to get AFC on board with APNU to secure a win in the next election. If AFC intends to stay independent, it may be the same as today gridlock if the PPP loses the parliament again.
Interesting!
Moses was the only AFC executive totally opposed to a coalition with APNU----all the others were amenable to a coalition.
Well, some of the AFC boys have begun deserting.
The Rev still sees Ramotar winning the next election----incumbents don't lose easily.
Rev
This must be a strategic move to get AFC on board with APNU to secure a win in the next election. If AFC intends to stay independent, it may be the same as today gridlock if the PPP loses the parliament again.
Interesting!
Moses was the only AFC executive totally opposed to a coalition with APNU----all the others were amenable to a coalition.
Well, some of the AFC boys have begun deserting.
The Rev still sees Ramotar winning the next election----incumbents don't lose easily.
Rev
He did not win the past election. He lost to the joint opposition by one seat. Next time around, it's possible that he may lead the opposition.
He did not win the past election. He lost to the joint opposition by one seat. Next time around, it's possible that he may lead the opposition.
Ramotar did not win the election ?
Really ?
Then who is President and which party controls the executive branch, where all the milk and honey flows ?
BOTTOM LINE:
Despite the PPP complacency and despite all the charges of corruption that was thrown against Jagdeo and his cabal, the PPP still managed to get 48.6% of the votes in the 2011 election.
And in the next election---the probability favors the incumbent Ramotar winning the presidency again.
Rev
He did not win the past election. He lost to the joint opposition by one seat. Next time around, it's possible that he may lead the opposition.
Ramotar did not win the election ?
Really ?
Then who is President and which party controls the executive branch, where all the milk and honey flows ?
BOTTOM LINE:
Despite the PPP complacency and despite all the charges of corruption that was thrown against Jagdeo and his cabal, the PPP still managed to get 48.6% of the votes in the 2011 election.
And in the next election---the probability favors the incumbent Ramotar winning the presidency again.
Rev
That's right. He did not win the election. He won the Presidency. In a true democracy, this would not have happened.
That's right. He did not win the election. He won the Presidency. In a true democracy, this would not have happened.
This was the result of the 1992 presidential election in America:
43.01%---Clinton(Democrat)
37.45%---Bush(Republican)
18.91%---Perot(Independent)
CLINTON WON THE PRESIDENCY----43.01% of the votes won him the electoral college.
QUESTION:
Will you say America is not a true democracy---Clinton won the Presidency in 1992 with 43% of the votes ?
Rev
That's right. He did not win the election. He won the Presidency. In a true democracy, this would not have happened.
This was the result of the 1992 presidential election in America:
43.01%---Clinton(Democrat)
37.45%---Bush(Republican)
18.91%---Perot(Independent)
CLINTON WON THE PRESIDENCY----43.01% of the votes won him the electoral college.
QUESTION:
Will you say America is not a true democracy---Clinton won the Presidency in 1992 with 43% of the votes ?
Rev
America have many checks and balances to tame the powers of the President. Guyana has none except corrupt chosen politicians.