Originally Posted by Chameli:
saw those movies
i used to be a big fan of Shabana Azmi (i think she was in FIRE)
Another thing we have in common.
I love her as well and just like you looking good also.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
* Lordy! Lordy! It looks like the Rev has landed in hot waters with the ladies on GNI for calling SRK short and ugly.
* Arrite! Arrite! Lemme make some amends---I read Anjali's comments about SRK being a man of charisma and talent---I guess women are attracted to and and put a big value on men like Sharukh Khan who make them smile, make them laugh, and make the feel good about themselves---Guess once a man projects enthusiasm and sex appeal---he's got it made with the smarter sex.
* Thank god for the way women think--even a frog can magically become a prince if he has talent, intelligence, charisma, and a sense of humor.hahaha
Rev
I'm glad you come to your senses
It's not always about looks. I agreed he is not your classic handsome man, SRK is considered as ruggedly handsome in my books. He's charismatic, dynamic and have just the right appeal to make him a dashing man 
Another example - I wouldn't consider Daniel Craig as a handsome man but he is super attractive and makes me swoon
Former Member
Originally Posted by Riya:
I'm glad you come to your senses
ha ha ha ha ha
riya:
* I told you I have a good teacher at home---yuh know how much time that woman slap some sense into my hard head---but I catch sense quick---I always learn.haha
* You mentioned some other stuff---I'll comment later---tad busy.
Rev
Former Member
Originally Posted by Riya:
It's not always about looks. I agreed he is not your classic handsome man, SRK is considered as ruggedly handsome in my books. He's charismatic, dynamic and have just the right appeal to make him a dashing man
Another example - I wouldn't consider Daniel Craig as a handsome man but he is super attractive and makes me swoon
Nurse Riya:
* You mentioned "your books", where can I buy copies I'd love to read them---you strike the Rev as a very knowledgeable and interesting woman.
* Anyway, Thanks for sharing with the forum the kinds of men who get your juices/hormones/dopamine flowing.
* By the way riya, did you know studies have shown that "there is a shift in male preference by women during their menstrual cycle---and most women are attracted to men with masculine bodies during ovulation but do not desire them as long term partners---I guess when the ovulation ceases that's when "super attractive" men like the man who makes you "swoon",Daniel Craig, stimulate the female hormones---but during ovulation---the masculine breed gets the "juices" flowing.
* Good lord women are complex.
* Anyway, Is there any truth in that study nurse riya ?
Rev
Former Member
My books are Mills and Boon and Harlequin Romance
I can prove that study wrong. I'm attracted to Daniel Craig, Jason Statham and SRK 365 days!
Former Member
Originally Posted by Riya:
My books are Mills and Boon and Harlequin Romance
riya's fantasy Jason Statham
I can prove that study wrong. I'm attracted to Daniel Craig, Jason Statham and SRK 365 days!
* Well riya, you were surely right when you said you liked your men "ruggedly handsome."hahaha
* Those romance Mills and Boon fiction served you well.
Rev
Former Member
Amral and Raymond, please ban Rev for sullying GNI!
Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Riya:
My books are Mills and Boon and Harlequin Romance
riya's fantasy Jason Statham
I can prove that study wrong. I'm attracted to Daniel Craig, Jason Statham and SRK 365 days!
* Well riya, you were surely right when you said you liked your men "ruggedly handsome."hahaha
* Those romance Mills and Boon fiction served you well.
Rev
Hai Ram! I just fainted
darn, darn, darn! God took his sweet time and made this man. Sigh.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Observer:
Amral and Raymond, please ban Rev for sullying GNI!
What are you, 6?
Just enjoy the eye candy
Former Member
Originally Posted by Riya:
Hai Ram! I just fainted
darn, darn, darn! God took his sweet time and made this man. Sigh.
ha ha ha ha
* Not only are you a woman of exquisite and immaculate taste when it comes to your men, but you are also funny. Thanks for the laugh.
Rev
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.
Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.
Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.
Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!
Former Member
HE ACHIEVED LEGENDARY SUCCESS AS AN ACTOR BUT HE IS QUITE MODEST ABOUT HIS ACHIEVEMENTS AND VERY GENEROUS IN HIS PRAISE FOR HIS DIRECTORS AND SCRIPT WRITERS.
Former Member
HE WANTED TO BE LIKE AMITABH--EXCELLENT TRIBUTE
Former Member
how can you guys rate these indian stars,indian movies is the worse directed movies in the world today
Former Member
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.
Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.
Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.
Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!
Bai, we talking Bollywood. If you want to combine them no one in the world come close to Amitabh for acting and no one in the world come close to Rafi and Lata for singing. But since we are talking Bollywood and SRK, to say that he is a star but not talented is incorrect. For that I draw your attention to Mohabbatein during some of his scenes with Amitabh.
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.
Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.
Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.
Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!
Bai, we talking Bollywood. If you want to combine them no one in the world come close to Amitabh for acting and no one in the world come close to Rafi and Lata for singing. But since we are talking Bollywood and SRK, to say that he is a star but not talented is incorrect. For that I draw your attention to Mohabbatein during some of his scenes with Amitabh.
Kzaazzzz, I say he is one-dimensional. He lacks range. His buffoonery as a grown man walking around like a high school boy with back-back and pretend basketball was ludicrous - and he even brought that image to one of his tours to New York.
You have to look at the body of work of Aamir Khan (who only gets involved in movies with good scripts) and Irfaan Khan, and see the deficiencies in Shah Rukh Khan's acting.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
Mira:
Could you give us a synopsis ? Tell us why you think it's worth the effort to effort to spend nearly 2 hours viewing. Thanks.
Rev
Rev, I see that you already have your synopsis
Former Member
Originally Posted by Villagebelle:
Wow....that's the whole movie you posted there Mira.
thank you!
Haven't seen this one, but i will have to make some time and watch it.
Saw Water....and it was very eye-opening to say the least.
VB, hope you get a chance to look at Fire.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Riya:
I saw Fire and Water years ago. I remember them being very deep.
Deepa Mehta is one of India's top film maker. Not your typical bollywood fluff and songs.
Riya, I also saw the movies years ago on my VCR I borrowed the videos from the public library.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:
Deepa Mehta is a socially conscious filmmaker.
Unlike Bollywood types, her films examine serious Indian societal issues. Of course, one cannot expect the orthodox and narrow-minded folks to like her films.
I agree!
Former Member
Originally Posted by Chameli:
is FIRE the one about the lesbians?
WATER is about the widows
EARTH?
Cham, I didn't see Earth. I have to look into it.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
134 online (2 members
/
132 guests)