Isn't that amazing? These mofos need a life. Or better yet, they need to be dead. It seems like every day there is a new group seeking to outdo the one before in their evil madness.

I agree.

Let's send in we bro Shaits along with a few other good aloo peelin mercenaries

Just an FYI,

The aloo peelers tend to have very little regard for the Geneva Convention

Let's send in we bro Shaits along with a few other good aloo peelin mercenaries

Shaits would love that.

Originally Posted by GT Stingaa:

Let's send in we bro Shaits along with a few other good aloo peelin mercenaries

Shaits would love that.

We're ready for the mission Sir:

What's your strategy sir? dis Mullah Al Kabob seems like he can be swayed with promises of coronas and poke cuttahs

Exactly Sir.

I recommend sticking to the traditional "Peeling Strategy" of peeling off principal enemy supporters with promises of coronas, poke cuttahs, and free visits to Aunty Ashna's

Then a second stage strategem of the "Slicing Doctrine" where we cut up their forces into easy bite-sized pieces

Unfortunately those militants don't read or they would have learned this also. Instead they are hell bent on their sick shit.

"But the very idea that Muhammad would have found any thing to be optimistic about in the carnage committed in his name on September 11th is an obscenity, because, as I try to show in these pages, Muhammad spent most of his life trying to stop that kind of indiscriminate slaughter. The very word islam, which denotes the existential “surrender” of the whole being to God, which Muslims are required to make, is related to salam, “peace.” And most importantly, Muhammad eventually abjured violence and pursued a daring, inspired policy on non-violence that was the culmination of his prophetic career. In imagining that the holy war was the culmination of his career, the fundamentalists (extremists) have distorted the whole meaning of his life.

Far from being the father of Jihad, Muhammad was a peacemaker, who risked his life and nearly lost his closest companions, because he was so determined to effect a reconciliation with Mecca. Instead of fighting an intransigent war to the death, Muhammad was prepared to negotiate and to compromise. And this apparent humiliation and capitulation proved, in the words of the Qur’an, to be a great victory (fat-‘h)....If we could view Muhammad as we do any other important historical figure we would surely consider him to be one of the greatest geniuses the world has known." - Karen Armstrong, Muhammad, a Biography of the Prophet

LMAO LMAO

Oh Allah. You Muslims doan even try to tinge your lies with a hint of truthiness

Muhammad the Peacemaker

Think Armstrong is getting any buyers bai. Even de ISIS folks are claiming that the man was violent. Who the heck does she think she is fooling.

The fact is that the Ibn Ishaq and al Tabari, the most pro-Muhammad biographers one can possibly quote, paint a picture of a violent desert warlord who was basically a successful caravan raider

Dem bais are crazy. I am actually beginning to toss out my ahadith books because there is so much there that appears to be made up to support the people at the time needs. One can read about 5 straight pages about something and have all these different scenarios. Try trying to understand what the Prophet did between Asr and Maghrib and you will end up with serious eye turn. And this is all the most reliable Sahih Bukhari books. The ahadiths to me is just a reference but I don't care for what is written there. In the Qur'an, Allah had to convince Muhammad that it was right for him to defend himself when he was struggling with the idea of picking up arms. The verse stated '.... sometimes you hate that which is good for you......" These ISIS bais got it wrong. They are more following Umar than Muhammad.

ummmm....Umar was one of the "four rightly guided Caliphs." Umar was a Companion of Muhammad and no one ever thought he acted contrary to Muhammad's teachings.

You're one of them wishy washy Western Muslims. Ready to cherry pick and choose stuff. Dem ISIS bais are the real deal.

I think Umar was responsible for people saying he was rightly guided.

You mean kind of like how Muhammad was responsible for people saying he was the Messenger of God?

That also puzzles me. Why does God always need messengers? Can't an all powerful being tell us his message himself instead of using third parties (almost always some goat herder/violent desert tribesman)?