Skip to main content

@Django posted:

That's  a fact ,Granger could have sworn in as President .The second declaration of Region 4 wasn't thrown out by the Court when it was sought to make it void. All the latter court matters was to get the declaration on validity of the recount tabulated votes.

Granger couldn’t swear himself in. That is done by the Chancellor of the Judiciary at the bequest of the GECOM Chairperson after the Chairperson makes the declaration. Fortunately for Guyana Granger’s handpicked Chairperson was unwilling to violate the constitution to appease him Granger. His original plan to misuse the Chairperson was against thwarted by the proper use of the constitution.

FM
@Django posted:

There is no push for any party agenda ,I state facts. The recount shows Massive FRAUD in the 2020 Elections. Further stated many times no affiliation to any political party in Guyana.

Only kowtows to ethnic identity will not see the evidence of  FRAUD .

Thankfully Guyana has an elections petition option so there are proper opportunities to present those evidences of fraud to the court. But the PNC needs to hurry up because they only have 28 days to file their petition. One quarter of that time would have elapsed today.

FM
@Django posted:

That's what the orbuculum says one party dictatorship headed by Indo Guyanese. 

Are you an Orbuculum? You seem to take jabs at the PPP at every opportunity you have. Politics is dirty and every party has a right to devise a plan to get into office by all fair means. Jagdeo was successful in bringing attention to the nation the type of party the PNC is by a successful NCM in which Granger and the PNC demonstrated that Guyana was a dictatorship under the PNC. The people noticed and threw him out. Your mantra about fraud is unfounded. Only in Guyana and only PNC supporters see fraud. The world 130 countries and the UN failed to buttress the PNC allegations. Do you believe in less than 300,000 people or the world? 

FM
@Former Member posted:

Are you an Orbuculum? You seem to take jabs at the PPP at every opportunity you have. Politics is dirty and every party has a right to devise a plan to get into office by all fair means. Jagdeo was successful in bringing attention to the nation the type of party the PNC is by a successful NCM in which Granger and the PNC demonstrated that Guyana was a dictatorship under the PNC. The people noticed and threw him out. Your mantra about fraud is unfounded. Only in Guyana and only PNC supporters see fraud. The world 130 countries and the UN failed to buttress the PNC allegations. Do you believe in less than 300,000 people or the world? 

You are correct ,device plans by hook or crook to grab power. Seem to keep repeating the propaganda from freedom house ,well what can one expect.

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

You are correct ,device plan by hook or crook to grab power. Seem to keep repeating the propaganda from freedom house.

This happens all over the world. It was not by hook or crook in Guyana. PNC bullied and stayed past their 5 years. So we see the crook as the PNC, hence their loss. If you are so hung up on fraud, let's wait and see what the election petition will do(id they are brave to file one). Keep in mind, the CCJ has ruled against any attempt to thwart the will of the people. Whatever happens in the election petition will end up before the CCJ again.

FM
@Former Member posted:

This happens all over the world. It was not by hook or crook in Guyana. PNC bullied and stayed past their 5 years. So we see the crook as the PNC, hence their loss. If you are so hung up on fraud, let's wait and see what the election petition will do(id they are brave to file one). Keep in mind, the CCJ has ruled against any attempt to thwart the will of the people. Whatever happens in the election petition will end up before the CCJ again.

Same record spinning over and over,all the blame on the Coalition . The two man tag team have a right to steal the elections. Not acceptable when Burnham and Hyote committed such acts .The government was not elected by the will of the people ,who you fooling.

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

Same record spinning over and over,all the blame on the Coalition . The two man tag team have a right to steal the elections. Not acceptable when Burnham and Hyote committed such acts .The government was not elected by the will of the people ,who you fooling.

Bhai, no one can convince you otherwise. The 130 countries and half of the Guyanese population are wrong and the minority is right.

FM
@Django posted:

Same record spinning over and over,all the blame on the Coalition . The two man tag team have a right to steal the elections. Not acceptable when Burnham and Hyote committed such acts .The government was not elected by the will of the people ,who you fooling.

So far no one except the Coalition is placing any blame on the PPP. However everyone in the world who has opined on this elections has blamed the Coalition. It is not the PPP against the Coalition. It is the world against fraud (the Coalition).

FM
@Former Member posted:

I am not sure if they will file the petition. This would require them to show their SOPs. Be careful what you wished for. If they refused during the just-completed legal process, what makes anyone think they will do it now and embarrass themselves?

Plus they must be broke now that they wasted so much time and money filing all those frivolous lawsuits. The PNC will force Moore, David and Jones to sell everything they have to pay those fees because the PNC wil only start paying what those three women don't pay.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Bhai, no one can convince you otherwise. The 130 countries and half of the Guyanese population are wrong and the minority is right.

The 130 Countries are propaganda ,if there are doubts show all the congratulatory messages form the head of states.

It's not true half of the Guyanese people elected the government ,don't try to fool people.

Django
@Django posted:

Do they have to ? what happened to the recount reports ?

Those recount REPORTS are just allegations. If they have proofs to verify the facts, produce them. Do you think they would have spent all that money in court costs if they had proofs that dead people voted? The dead people voted was an imaginary product of Amna Ally.

FM
@Former Member posted:

Those recount REPORTS are just allegations. If they have proofs to verify the facts, produce them. Do you think they would have spent all that money in court costs if they had proofs that dead people voted?

The dead people voted was an imaginary product of Amna Ally.

Missing statutory documents are allegations? do you know what the court matters was about  ? you are all over the place. Bhai give it a rest

Django
Last edited by Django
@kp posted:

There will be no election petition, Why waste time and money to fight a losing battle. Presently ,their record in the courts is very poor results.

Do you know this?  It would be difficult to lose an elections petition if the Chief Elections Officer is one of your witnesses. If the person who oversaw the process tells a judge that the people's will was not reflected in the declared results that would be powerful testimony.    

T
@Totaram posted:

Do you know this?  It would be difficult to lose an elections petition if the Chief Elections Officer is one of your witnesses. If the person who oversaw the process tells a judge that the people's will was not reflected in the declared results that would be powerful testimony.    

If Lowenfield is the PNC star witness they will certainly not file any petition. Lowenfield is frightened of the courts. The last time they had to stake out to ketch him on the last possible day before his court hearing. Secondly testimony is inadequate unless backed up with evidence especially since much of Lowenfield's testimony over the past five months have been proven false.   

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Former Member posted:

If Lowenfield is the PNC star witness they will certainly not file any petition. Lowenfield is frightened of the courts. The last time they had to stake out to ketch him on the last possible day before his court hearing. Secondly testimony is inadequate unless backed up with evidence especially since much of Lowenfield's testimony over the past five months have been proven false.   

There is evidence .  The argument all along was that the evidence will have to be dealt with in an elections petition.  

T

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×