Skip to main content


PPP is like “an ungrateful dog” to the people – Nagamootoo

November 12, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 
 

The prorogation of the Parliament by President Donald Ramotar has elicited strong responses from leaders of the

AFC Vice Chairman, Moses Nagamootoo

AFC Vice Chairman, Moses Nagamootoo

 

opposition parties, with Vice Chairman of the Alliance For Change (AFC), Moses Nagamootoo, asserting that the action by the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) administration is tantamount to being an “ungrateful dog” to the people.
The attorney-at-law commented that the government has certainly served the Parliament, and by extension the citizens, a “devastating blow”. He predicted, too, that the government would most likely use the “break” to start a campaign to garner lost votes.
Nagamootoo told Kaieteur News that he is worried about the financial improprieties that will take place, in light of the absence of scrutiny that will result from the suspension of the National Assembly.
The AFC Parliamentarian opined that government will now use the opportunity to go on a spending campaign in an effort to recover lost ground.
“They will be spending. They will probably commit themselves to activating certain programmes to show that they care. So what is going to happen is a campaign of social bribes. They will focus on Amerindian areas and other communities, for it is all about catching as many votes as it can now.
“They will also use state media to the maximum to sell the party, because at this point, the government is terribly wounded. The PPP is more concerned about recovering lost ground. The government is also going to use this six-month breathing period to deal with internal problems.”
The Vice Chairman said that there is an internal crisis in terms of deciding who will be the Party’s next Presidential candidate should there be a general election.
“And obviously Ramotar knows he is being challenged, and talks of the likes of Rohee and others – who would be standing and looking on to see where they would come in – are already in the air. I am not at all enamored by the idea that we are going to see the PPP focusing on the bigger developmental projects; they always miss the bigger picture,” Nagamootoo said.
Asked to what extent he believes the Parliament will be affected by the six-month suspension, the AFC Executive said that he believes that the decision will be a huge setback.
He made reference to the fact that members of the regional districts rely on their representing Members of Parliament to bring their troubles to the national table for discussion.  However, he said, those citizens will now have to suffer from a huge “disconnect”. He deemed this to be a most dangerous implication of the decision taken by the government.
“If you are not able to bring the feelings or the concerns of the people to the Parliament, then you are asking for trouble. In any democracy, a Parliament is considered a cooling-off pool where people can come and peacefully resolve issues, but in an extra-parliamentary situation, such as what we have today, it breeds confrontation. That for me is an ingredient in our politics that we shouldn’t have,” the politician asserted.
Nagamootoo was also asked if he believes that the move to prorogue parliament has, in a sense, made the people powerless for six months. He answered in the affirmative.
“President Donald Ramotar has undone the power of the people. While some sections of society voted for the government, they have now realized that they are not worth anything, considering that it (Gov’t) has withdrawn from the place to talk the people’s business. The people want the government to face the edge of the sword and it is hiding from its inevitable end.”
“The problem with the current administration is that it continues to beat its chest at the top of the highest tower and shout about its belief of empowering the people, and when it gets down from the tower, it goes on a hypocritical stage and acts out its true feelings—that being that it doesn’t care about the people.”
“It’s like training your own dog to be a pet and it has turned back to bite you. That’s what the PPP has done. It has turned its back on the people. It’s an ungrateful dog!” Nagamootoo stated emphatically.
The Parliamentarian said that the government’s decision to make the Parliament impotent sends a “terrifying message” for politics in Guyana.

FM
Originally Posted by Martha Lucci:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by asj:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by asj:

There is no way that the PPP/C will win if Elections were held today.

 

 


Thankfully, there aren't enough DIRTY PNC INDIANS to deny the PPP victory in the next election in Guyana.

 

Rev

Rev Roly Poly Aly, you seem to forget that your mother was a Dirty PNC INdian.

Bai we need not get to Rev Mama,

HIs mother and father supported Burnham.

 

Martha, you have hit the nail directly with the hammar, this Antiman, send me a Magic mirror and asked what I see and lo and behold, and the mirror shows the he his mama and papa were in a Burnham Orgy. One day I give a discriptive views of that magic mirror, and those orgies.

FM

Man gets suspended sentence for 67 kilos of cocaine

November 13, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 

A confessed drug dealer who admitted to trafficking in more than 67 kilograms of cocaine may not spend a day in prison.

Leonard Bacchus

Leonard Bacchus

Leonard Bacchus who was arrested three years ago after a police raid netted the $300M worth of narcotics, which was contained in kunds, was handed a five year suspended sentence by Magistrate Alex Moore when the matter came to a close on Tuesday.
Bacchus was also given a slap on the wrist suspended sentence of two years for being in unlawful possession of 125, 12-guade cartridges and 115, .32 rounds of ammunition, which also stemmed from the raid on his block 20 Enmore/Haslington Housing Scheme, East Coast Demerara home on August 16, 2001.
In addition to being spared a mandatory prison term, Bacchus was fined a measly $2.5M.
This means that he will only go to jail if he commits another offence within the five year period.
When the prosecution, which was started by Superintendent Karim Baksh and concluded by Inspector Stephen Telford, closed its case, the court found that a case was made out against Bacchus and Magistrate Moore ordered him to lead a defence.
But in a surprise move, Bacchus, who was represented by Attorney at Law James Bond, changed his plea to guilty on both charges.
Magistrate Moore accepted the plea and then informed Bacchus that in addition to possible jail time he was staring at a fine of more than $300M.
But, then to the amazement of most of the persons in the courtroom, the Magistrate handed down the suspended sentence for both of the charges.
He then considered the pleas of Bacchus’ lawyer that he could only afford to pay a fine of $2.5M, which he was given up to the end of June next year to do.
Meanwhile, Bacchus’ wife Indranie was set free by the Magistrate.
His 17- year old son was also acquitted by the Magistrate who said that no evidence was offered against him.
Legal sources have indicated that the law hardly provides for a suspended sentence when a person is found guilty of trafficking in narcotics and possession of ammunition.
The Director of Public Prosecutions has indicated that the Magistrate’s decision would be appealed.
The case of the cocaine in kunds attracted much public interest when it first came to light in 2011.
Back then, the now late attorney Vic Puran, who in representing the Bacchus family had said that Leonard Bacchus had given police a statement saying that he was merely doing a job of sanding and polishing the Kunds, “which were delivered to him by someone else.”
The lawyer had also accused investigators of trying to force Mr. Bacchus into a plea bargain deal and into implicating others in the drug find.
After the bust, the police had questioned a housing scheme developer after allegedly being informed that he was the person shipping the kunds overseas.
Police said that the Bacchus family had been under surveillance for three months prior to the discovery of the cocaine in their home.
The Bacchus family members were remanded to prison when they made their first court appearance on August 23, but were able to secure high court bail to the tune of $1M each on November 23rd.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

Shows clearly what kind of Justice System the Corrupt PPP/C operates

De President can Drop all De Bogus Charges against Glen Lall...... if he stop exposeing Corruption fuh one week.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

IF ELECTIONS WERE HELD TODAY, THE CORRUPT PPP/C WOULD BE HISTORY

Are you saying that APNU would win?

 

What people need to discuss isn't whether the PPP will lose or not, but what do they think are the chances that APNU will win.  I some how don't think that many think that APNU will win, at least not unless the AFC really savages the PPP in its base.

 

A likely scenario will be a PPP plurality with a smaller number of seats.  I hope that APNU and the AFC have a plan for that, but knowing how stupid the APNU is, and how full of self delusion the AFC is, I doubt it.

 

I will suggest that APNU has a 30% floor and a 40% cap, while the PPP has a 40% floor.  The race vote still exists and the PPP will always gain some non Indian votes by their ability to buy it.  This suggests that the AFC has a 30% cap.

FM

Enduring shame of the underpaid

November 3, 2014 | By | Filed Under Editorial 

One of this nation’s most enduring shames is the fact that a significant number of hardworking Guyanese do not earn a living wage and feel as though they are holding on to life by a thread. It seems as though many of our decision-makers regard this shame solely as an economic issue, inextricably linked to the state of the economy.
We had the Public Service Minister some time ago expressing that public servants should be happy with a five percent increase, citing that this is one of the few countries in the world that has been offering any salary increases to its public servants, and doing so on an annual basis. It was emphasised that in several Caribbean territories and further afield, workers are being laid off and some have had to take pay cuts in order to remain employed.
The Minister then attempted to provide a strong dose of reality by asserting that the cupboard is bare. “We can’t give what we don’t have,” was the blunt assertion. She concluded by urging workers to be more understanding of the prevailing economy not just in Guyana, but worldwide.
By now, those in the ruling administration with a modicum of understanding would have recognised that this is much more than an economic issue; it is a matter of ensuring basic human rights. Every working Guyanese has a basic right to a fair living wage.
Low wage earners account for a substantial part of the country’s workforce. Some minimum wage workers are young adults just out of school who are cushioned by family earnings, but many are women with children who are the sole source of income in their households. Unfortunately, the earnings of lowest paid workers in Guyana put them well below the international poverty line of US$1.25 (G$250) a day.
By most accounts, the average monthly earnings by low-income workers in Guyana are barely in this range, and many earn even less. Their ranks include some of the most important workers in Guyana, like teachers, nurses and members of the disciplined forces. These workers simply cannot meet their basic needs without subsidies of some kind, mainly from overseas-based relatives.
Meanwhile, the cost of the fundamental amenities of life has increased much faster than wages and salaries. Food, clothing, and particularly the cost of housing and rent are rising steadily.
Even with the government’s housing drive in full flow, it is still increasingly difficult for low-income families to afford even modest accommodation. Guyana continues to endure the disastrous social consequences of endemic poverty. Unfortunately, many of the lowest incomes are earned by public sector workers.
What government needs to do is to once and for all set a standard, giving precisely the minimum amount of money full-time workers need to meet all basic needs in Guyana’s economy without government subsidies. It should then set goals attached to realistic time-frames that would move the minimum wage upwards to meet that standard, which would be updated at appropriate intervals.
The administration might also find it useful to mandate that businesses under contract with the government, and businesses receiving grants, subsidies, tax breaks or any other concessions from government must pay their employees a living wage. Leaving it up to the laws of supply and demand has not worked in the interest of Guyanese workers. Workers have had to accept whatever wages they could get or simply remain unemployed, and the most desperate workers accept absurdly low wages and salaries.
Setting a standard living wage and seeking to move the legal minimum wage towards it in a specific time-frame is the way to go. Workers want to see purposeful, distinctly positive steps towards giving low wage earners a fair living wage. Otherwise, workers will feel they are clinging to life by a thread and the labour market in Guyana as well as labour relations would be plagued with turmoil.
The ongoing protests might just be the tip of the iceberg.

 
FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by asj:

IF ELECTIONS WERE HELD TODAY, THE CORRUPT PPP/C WOULD BE HISTORY

Are you saying that APNU would win?

 

What people need to discuss isn't whether the PPP will lose or not, but what do they think are the chances that APNU will win.  I some how don't think that many think that APNU will win, at least not unless the AFC really savages the PPP in its base.

 

A likely scenario will be a PPP plurality with a smaller number of seats.  I hope that APNU and the AFC have a plan for that, but knowing how stupid the APNU is, and how full of self delusion the AFC is, I doubt it.

 

I will suggest that APNU has a 30% floor and a 40% cap, while the PPP has a 40% floor.  The race vote still exists and the PPP will always gain some non Indian votes by their ability to buy it.  This suggests that the AFC has a 30% cap.

If we can see a marriage between AFC/APNU then the Corrupt PPP/C would be history. But would the AFC willing to take this gamble?

With mutual discussion on this subject, I think that understanding between both parties are workable:

 

Meaning that Parties AFC/APNU retain what they have now, and going as a coalition, divvy up the gains between themselves equally, and that will be going into any elections as a coalition. If they win, then they form the Government based on amount of seats they have after elections, AFC with their Gains, and APNU with their gains. 

 

Going it alone, might very well bring the PPP/C back to power again, now is the time, I do hope that in order to kick the PPP/C out, this is the decision they need to arrive at.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:
There is no way that the PPP/C will win if Elections were held today

Whether today, tomorrow, next month, next year, etc., the PPP/C will win the elections and form the government.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:
If we can see a marriage between AFC/APNU then the Corrupt PPP/C would be history. But would the AFC willing to take this gamble?

The marriage was formally established immediately after the elections in 2011.

FM

De Hydro Seed Engineer...

tell us about how Burnham sign yuh Card

and giv yuh Wuk when Rodney could not get wuk.

IF ELECTIONS WERE HELD TODAY,

THE CORRUPT PPP/C WOULD BE HISTORY

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by asj:
If we can see a marriage between AFC/APNU then the Corrupt PPP/C would be history. But would the AFC willing to take this gamble?

The marriage was formally established immediately after the elections in 2011.

Dont be silly. They are in opposition, do you expect them to be in agreement with the shenanigans of the blasted corrupted govt, NO.

If they do decide to join in an effort to throw out those sleazy bastards then I would stand behind them,ANYTHING TO THROW OUT THOSE SLIMY BASTARDS AND TOSS THEIR ASSES INTO THE CLINK.

cain

The unity of the opposition has been imposed on them by the PPP and ironically that is essentially going to be the most powerful undoing of this racist, thiefin PPP government.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:
 

Are you saying that APNU would win?

 

What people need to discuss isn't whether the PPP will lose or not, but what do they think are the chances that APNU will win.  I some how don't think that many think that APNU will win, at least not unless the AFC really savages the PPP in its base.

 

A likely scenario will be a PPP plurality with a smaller number of seats.  I hope that APNU and the AFC have a plan for that, but knowing how stupid the APNU is, and how full of self delusion the AFC is, I doubt it.

 

I will suggest that APNU has a 30% floor and a 40% cap, while the PPP has a 40% floor.  The race vote still exists and the PPP will always gain some non Indian votes by their ability to buy it.  This suggests that the AFC has a 30% cap.

If we can see a marriage between AFC/APNU then the Corrupt PPP/C would be history. But would the AFC willing to take this gamble?

With mutual discussion on this subject, I think that understanding between both parties are workable:

 

Meaning that Parties AFC/APNU retain what they have now, and going as a coalition, divvy up the gains between themselves equally, and that will be going into any elections as a coalition. If they win, then they form the Government based on amount of seats they have after elections, AFC with their Gains, and APNU with their gains. 

 

Going it alone, might very well bring the PPP/C back to power again, now is the time, I do hope that in order to kick the PPP/C out, this is the decision they need to arrive at.

  The AFC isn't open to a pre election coalition and I don't see that they should be.  The fact is that many who support them do so out of the hope that at some point, even if not in the immediate future, they will emerge as a major party, lifting Guyana out of the morass that it has been in for more than 50 years.  They will not if they become as absorbed by APNU as the WPA has become.

 

People need to face the fact that the most likely scenario will be a PPP plurality again, most likely with an even smaller vote than before. The PPP also knows this as Luncheon admitted that a minority gov't might be a "permanent" feature.

 

So I suggest that APNU and the AFC should begin addressing the possibility of this rather than foolishly hoping that APNU will win.  The AFC needs to learn how to anticipate their support because on the last two occasions they guessed wrong. 

 

They need to stop thinking that the mere fact that people aren't happy with the major players means that they will get the vote.  I was told that several people liked them last election but supported APNU as they saw a vote for the AFC as wasted as they didn't see them able to win. 

 

I doubt that much has changed, even though a further encroachment into the PPP strongholds is likely as that party implodes into extreme arrogance as noted by their AG.  Even Priya had to speak out against Anil's behavior so there is no point for the PPP chorus to deny or excuse this thuggery.

FM
Originally Posted by HM_Redux:

The unity of the opposition has been imposed on them by the PPP and ironically that is essentially going to be the most powerful undoing of this racist, thiefin PPP government.

I assume that you mean unity in coordinating strategies because I doubt the AFC wants to be part of that APNU mess, which Granger seems unable/unwilling to handle.

FM

quote "So I suggest that APNU and the AFC should begin addressing the possibility of this rather than foolishly hoping that APNU will win.  The AFC needs to learn how to anticipate their support because on the last two occasions they guessed wrong."unquote

 

Just like I am suggesting, this would not be a merger per se, but an agreement for both opposition parties to keep their now strength plus whatever collectively

gains in the next elections, so it is not a permanent thing like the WPA.

This way if they merged then I think that the Corrupt and thiefing PPP/C will be history..............as I say they need to have discussion, nothing to lose, but more to gain. If they do pull it off, (and I think it is the only way to defeat the PPP/C ) then they form the Government on their new strength, but retain their own indentity with an increase amount of seats.

 

Anything to shove those scumbags of the PPP/C to the wayside forever.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

As a member of the PPP/C, I condemn this move that borders on dictatorship

NOVEMBER 14, 2014 | BY  | FILED UNDER LETTERS 

Dear Editor, Mr. Ramotar’s decision to “prorogue” Parliament is a decision that I, a member of the PPP/Civic list in the 2011 general election, cannot accept, but only condemn as anti-democratic and boarding on dictatorship. As a member of the PPP/Civic list, I was never consulted, invited to any PPP/Civic meeting nor even canvassed over the telephone for an opinion. I remember at Freedom House on the night of the 2011 General Elections, telling Mr. Ramotar that he has to be a President of compromise, reconciliation and dialogue in the five years of his term, faced with a Parliamentary minority.  I further told Mr. Ramotar in emails, personal conversation and at the one meeting, I was invited to in the last three years- to bring Mr. Granger and some of his APNU operatives into a Government of united efforts for our dear Nation.  I furthermore always urged local elections which were promised personally to me by President Ramotar, and which have never materialized- a grave mistake on the PPP’s part and which will come to haunt this regime. The no-confidence motion by the AFC is the excuse used to close down Parliament; I felt that that motion was not a tool to be used by the opposition at the present time.  However, the presumptiveness of this government in not holding local elections in combination with financial irregularities and “strange happenings” with foreign investments convinces me that the decision to close down Parliament is definitely not in the interest of our Nation, especially the dread effects it will have on the business climate in Guyana. President Cheddi would never have suspended the constitution as this PPP government has done.  Even after the riots and bloodshed of the 1960s, Jagan offered a solution of coalition government, with compromise and national reconciliation. Therefore, Editor, I would like the Guyanese public to know that I completely disassociate myself from the PPP’s decision to shut down our Parliament and more than that, to head down the road to perdition by breaking the backbone of democracy in our country.  Parliament, in your heritage as an English speaking country, is  the backbone of any democracy (along with the Press) and to close down Parliament, where Jagan was molded and nurtured as a politician, is a slap in the face of his legacy, and to his service to this nation.  Shame on those who made this decision and shame on those who agree to it- a disgrace and calamity for our nation. Cheddi (Joey) Jagan (Jr)

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

 

Just like I am suggesting, this would not be a merger per se, .


The constitution prevents post election alliances, and awards the executive arm of governance to who ever wins the plurality. So if the AFC wins 21%, APNU keeps its 40% and the PPP is reduced to 39% then APNU wins.

 

Were this to happen I can already anticipate the yelling and screaming at Freedom House where they will demand that there is a run off between the PPP and APNU, even though the constitution doesnt require that.

FM

Emails, recorded telephone conversation expose…Jagdeo/Nandlall/Sattaur plot to kill staff and shutdown K/News

October 4, 2014 | By | Filed Under Heist of Guyana, News 
 

September 21, 2014

Jagdeo/Sattaur plot to destroy Kaieteur News unearthed

Publisher of the Kaieteur News, Glenn Lall, is in possession of incontrovertible evidence of a plot by former President, Bharrat Jagdeo, and Commissioner-General of the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA), Khurshid Sattaur, to bring down Kaieteur News. Confidential documentation, leaked to this publication, reveals that the Commissioner-General provided the former President with detailed tax information of a number of independent media houses in Guyana.tax - a a The disclosure of the information by GRA’s Commissioner-General to Jagdeo, represents a grave breach of the ‘Oath of Secrecy’ sworn to by Sattaur as an officer of the Guyana Revenue Authority, said one lawyer. In taking the Oath, Sattaur solemnly declared that he would “truly, faithfully, impartially and honestly execute the powers vested in him.” He also swore that he would “judge and determine upon all matters and things before him without fear, affection, or malice”. And he swore, too, not to disclose any tax information concerning any taxpayer, but this has not been the case. Both Jagdeo and Sattaur are fully aware of the impropriety of their action and as such Sattaur even acknowledged, in the documents, that Jagdeo is expected to treat the information with confidence, said the lawyer. The documents would lift the lid off a few Government officials who have been insisting that all is right in Guyana and democracy is very much alive, he added. Both Kaieteur News and Stabroek News have been on the receiving end of Government’s anger over critical issues like corruption, value for money on projects, and local government elections. This publication is of the firm view that former President Jagdeo is not entitled to receive financial or tax information of any taxpayer, let alone a private citizen, as it would be highly improper, and clearly a breach of regulations. The information received revealed that Jagdeo advised Sattaur on “an impending major audit of the Kaieteur News” as a public ploy to defend the GRA and Sattaur against criticisms by the Kaieteur News. There is strong indication, according to the documents seen by Kaieteur News, that the plot between Sattaur and Jagdeo was hatched after a news report a few weeks ago raised questions over the employment of three children of the Commissioner-General at GRA. The report had questioned whether it was proper. Sattaur had also been highly defensive and upset with Kaieteur News and the private media, after questions were asked of GRA’s role in granting Bai Shan Lin, a Chinese logging company that is being investigated by Parliament, tens of millions of dollars in duty free concessions. When asked about details of the duty free concessions granted to Bai Shan Lin, Sattaur made it clear that the laws that are in place barred him from ever disclosing the information. He said that the matter was closed. As such, the public was kept in the dark over those duty free concessions for high-end SUVs, like a Lexus, an Infiniti series, and even a number of luxury vans. The granting of duty free concessions for vehicles pertaining to investments has to be relevant to the type of investment being made. GRA remained silent on this and also how it granted the duty free concessions even before Bai Shan Lin was given permission to freely operate its concessions. According to Kaieteur News’s publisher, Glenn Lall, he is now even more convinced that certain members within the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic and Government are determined to silence the voice of the independent media. “The use of the Guyana Revenue Authority, a body to which members of the public entrust their most private information, as a weapon against the media is a dangerous development indeed, and a violation of press freedom… “Kaieteur News is forced to ask what other tax information has not been compromised by Sattaur and Jagdeo?” Lall opined that it is time for Sattaur to step down as Commissioner-General of GRA with an independent, criminal investigation launched to enquire the role played by Jagdeo, and to ensure that the tax agency is operating within its mandate. “We also call on President Donald Ramotar to take steps to prevent Mr. Jagdeo from interfering further in his administration of the country,” Lall said.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×