Your post lack substance and speaks volumes of your effeminate traits.

Mitwah, Your ignorance is bliss... 

You are drunk.

It does not change the fact they you are ignorant and stupid..

Rama:

The remarkable Amerindian people are very loyal to President Ramotar and the PPP.

Rev

Yes! Indeed..  Death to the AFC!

Rama:

The AFC is no longer the Alliance For Change---it has now morphed into the ALL FOR CATHY(AFC) party!

Members are leaving in droves!

When all is said and done, only Moses and Khemraj will remain with the ALL FOR CATHY(AFC) party.

BERBICIANS ARE STUNNED!

Their hero Moses Nagamootoo has been reduced to washing Cathy Hughes panties in the ALL FOR CATHY(AFC) party.

QUESTION:

11,634 Berbicians in Region 6 voted for the Alliance For Change(AFC) in the 2011 election. How many of those Berbicians will vote for the ALL FOR CATHY(AFC) party in the next election ?

Rev

More effeminate posts from Miss Rev.

Rev, don't you find Cathy's shirt attractive. I know you luv that color.

THE AFC HAS INDEED CHANGED.  MITWAH IS THEIR ONLY SPOKESPERSON.

Why are you screaming?

The more members leave the AFC, the more lil bais for the leader of the pedophile gang, mjuanita. ahahah

Wally:

Why do you want the thread locked ?

Do you find the word "panties" vulgar and offensive ?

There are posters here on gni who have verbally abused the mothers of other posters----I didn't hear any complaint from you.

But now the Rev has accused  Moses and Khemraj of washing Cathy's Pa**** you are bawling for the thread to be locked ?

The Rev had you down as an adult and a sensible man Wally---was I wrong ?

Rev

Rev you hitting them boys too bad there

Wally bhai:

The new Rev decided no more race baiting on GNI---so I have to use another strategy to attack the dirty PNC Indians----some here bawled and screamed when posted that Moses and Khemraj were reduced to washing Cathy's pa***** in the ALL FOR CATHY(AFC) party.

THE TRUTH HURTS!

Rev

PS. Note the Rev did not spell out the P word above---it's deemed offensive by some of the men here.

Indos are migrating too, maybe at even higher rates.

Rev finds that licking the butta from Kwame's BT decadent.

decadent? oh boy.........

The AFC has its problems, but then Ramotar is definitely way less charismatic than Jagdeo.  So who is to say that PPP supporters mightnt stay home.

As of now no political party in Guyana can be so confident to think that they have a guaranteed group of hard core supporters sufficient to deliver more than 50%.

The Amerindians are not necessarily impressed with the PPP either.  Just look at the gains made by APNU and the AFC in some interior locations.  The notion of the PNC winning a not shabby number of voters in the Rupununi should worry the PPP, given that they have still not forgotten how Burnham crushed their rebellion in the 60s.

The more the PPP continues to deprive Amerindians of their rights in the regions and beat their women with the thug police Rohee controls there is no way PPP winning anything in the Amerindian communities. 

Region 8 was the first domino to fall, the rest will tumble in the next election. No matter what goadie Ramotar take and sell there.

Important to note APNU and AFC has the most Amerindian MP's in parliament and more than likely those amerindians will move away from the corruption in the AFC and join APNU to remove the blight of the PPP from their backs.

 Rev thinks he is an effete self-professed intellectual.

e mussy buy e qualifications or rig up dem ting through a diploma mill like e PPP champian dem Nephew in law and company.

* Well, it is true that the uncharismatic Donald Ramotar pulled only 48.6% in the 2011 elections.

* But check this, the uncharismatic Donald Ramotar came within 4723 votes of winning a majority 50.1% of the votes.

* And by the way, the charismatic David Granger only received 40.83% of the votes

* And the charismatic Moses Nagamootoo and Khemraj Ramjattan only received 10.3% of the votes.

BOTTOM LINE:

With the disintegration of the Alliance For Change, and with the uncharismatic Donald Ramotar having served 5 years as President by 2016, there is a 99% chance the uncharismatic Donald Ramotar will be re-elected President with a higher percentage than he received in 2011.

REMEMBER THE UNCHARISMATIC RAMOTAR MISSED OUT ON 50.1% BY ONLY 4723 votes in 2011.

Rev

The people who voted for Moses Nagamootoo and the AFC in 2011 said that they cannot trust them anymore.  If elections are held today, the PPP will get over 51% of the votes.

Rama:

You can almost bet the house on that--the PPP will win a majority in the next election.

Listen! The most votes, percentage wise, the PNC has ever won in a free and fair election was 42.3% back in 1992----so that 42.3% represents the ceiling for the PNC.

With the AFC disintegrating, that means the PPP and PNC will together pull over 95% of the votes in the next election.

DO THE MATH!

With the PNC's ceiling at 42.3%----you can easily see that the PPP is guaranteed 50+ %

By the way, there are not enough dirty PNC Indians in Guyana to help the PNC defeat the PPP.

Rev

Dude, you cannot do the math. You are ignorant of numbers and only quote them simplistically. You depend on crude vestigial concepts of casteism and its historical wounds on our ancestral Sudra status as unclean to hide your innumeracy. You play on that fear of people thinking for themselves to gain credibility. Our society and politics is bifurcated on race and on that history you prey.

You are missing the fact that 90 percent of the electorate does not reside in your world. They do not know you caste dependencies and care little for your racial boundary taboos. One in 4 of our people are now of a blended hue so your number schemes and its dependency on race will not factor. And there are other variables you fail to look at.

The Primary one is the negative returns of naked corruption. The young people in the society know they cannot reach the full capacity of their creative capabilities in a system driven by nepotism. Crony capitalism of the kind the PPP practices will drive many of these forward thinking people away from traditional patterns of voting. 

Then there is migration patterns. While the PPP can depend on the new immigrants especially the Chinese on whose backs many of the PPP insiders made a bundle through t he selling visas and opportunity to live in GY, many indians are also leaving in numbers that they cannot be replenished by the inflows. Then there is the natural process of things never being the same way in perpetuity. The PPP are on their way out and no one can stop that. They are falling below 40 percent this time.

Dunce D2

Cannot back up his argument by any stats. Instead he uses a bunch of words that translates to nonsense. Numbers do not lie. 

Let us not forget that D2 has an intense hate for Indo Guyanese. He is a qualified staunch PNC defender. 

There is not stats there worthy of reckoning. He is a innumerate dunce. And yes I know statistics very well. Numbers do not lie but in the hands of a dunce they are a clumsy tool for illustrating facts. The PPP are a minority government because they could not defend  3 points. It takes only 8 more to put them out to pasture. They can still hold the government but the opposition will dismantle them piece by piece and the way they will do it will be to t he benefit of the guyanese people.

Statistics tells us that with a super majority the Executive Presidency, closed lists and crony capitalism is gone. It tells us that 10 percent of the people did not vote and they are mainly in the African community. It told us that another 10% did not register and that is another unknown. It tells us that there will be another 10% new voters are coming on line and these are mainly in the African areas. If his statistics is to mean anything then he will have to worry about that also. Add to that another 3 to 5 percent Indian loss to migration. As it is that is an 30 to 35% uncertainty in the wings and only an 8% pick up necessary.

Danny Boy!

READ THIS:

Now pay attention Danny boy:

* David Granger received 40.83% of the votes in 2011----he was roundly rejected by the Guyanese voters----the man is a proven failure and loser.

* The highest voters, percentage wise, the PNC has ever received in a free and fair election was 42.3% in 1992.

THOSE ARE FACTS AND REAL NUMBERS.

Now Danyael---go take your male menopause medication and calm down.

Rev

The usual pretentious bilge...We have a record of you being wrong despite your grotesque protestations to great understanding....sell that to the people who buy bridges

Danny Boy!

The Rev is wrong a lot of times, but I am 100% right about these numbers:

* Granger received 40.83% of the votes in the 2011 election---the man is a proven failure and loser.

* The most votes, percentage wise, the PNC has ever gotten in a free and fair election was 42.3% in 1992.

THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE DANYAEL.

Rev

Numbers may not lie, but you are  an incorrigible liar. No one is buying your snake oil.

The Rev has banned the following GNI posters--Mitwah, Jalil, and JB---and will not respond to them directly again.

Of course, they are free to post on any thread the Rev starts---every opinion is welcome----but the Rev will not respond to them directly or post on any threads they start.

Rev

Rev, you is a rale anti man 100%.

You are quite the ass to believe that because you do not respond to them they cannot wipe your face in the dust daily. The ignore button is an idiot button.

You not being on their threads gives it a chance to produce fruitful conversation. This useless swiping of pictures as dialog is for the birds. In the olden days when he cared about his web quotas, Amral would ban your behind. These days he does not mind if you steal bandwidth from some poor sucker whose pictures you steal. He forgot what used to plague him; the lack of bandwidth.

Yes, what you do is in most quarters a travesty and a pillage of some poor sucker piddly finite bandwidth in their attempt to display their work. The gross useless theft of their work for vicarious consumption is exactly that; theft.

So whats your point?

1.  Is the PPP most likely to win?  Yes.  Tribal voting and the power of incumbency and the ineptness of APNU (dispelling any notions of wide spread cross ethnic support of that party) suggests that they will.

2.  Is the PPP guaranteed to win back the support that it lost.  Jagdeo was very involved in the campaigning last time.  Now it will be up to Ramotar.  He is very boring and fails to inspire confidence, so many who voted last time might not this time.

I suggest that you put aside any notion of a guaranteed PPP winning of 50%+.  Last time you all screamed 60% with rampant support from blacks.  The mere fact that your goals are more humble this time should suggest to you how soft support for the PPP is getting and how more and more Guyanese are no longer bothering to vote.

Carib!

The Rev was dead wrong about the US election in 2012---everyone knows that.

But regarding the Guyana election in 2011---the Rev started posting on GNI in January 2012, so no way I could have been talking about a 60% win for the Ramotar and the PPP.

Having said that---I did expect the PPP to pull over 50%----but Moses, Charan Das and others played a huge role in pulling votes away from the PPP, particularly Region 6.

THE PPP MISSED OUT ON 50% BY 4723 votes in 2011----but with the crisis in the AFC---there is a good chance the region 6 votes will put the PPP over 50% in the next election.

Rev

A miss is as good as a mile. They lost. Gore missed by 500 or so votes. He lost. That is the realty. Incumbency and casual appropriation of the states assets project their message and paint the entire nation in communist red not to mention dressing  every Amerindian in the PPP monkey suit did not help them win comfortably. The will lose comfortably next.

Danny Boy!

Fair enough---like you say--a miss is as good as a mile---but did PPP didn't lose the executive branch---they just lost the majority.

But with the disintegration of the AFC and with the PNC stuck at 40%, you can bet the house that Donald Rabindranauth Ramotar will win the 2016 election by a majority.

Rev

Did you forecast that the PPP would be a minority govt because the AFC pulled Berbice votes from the PPP and the PNC did an excellent job in pulling out votes, even in West Dem?

Despite a lower voter turnout APNU INCREASED its votes in 2011.  Just understand that those voters are virulently anti PPP, not pro PNC, and voted for the party which they thought woulkd be most likely able to confine the PPP to being a minority party, even if it didnt lose.

You will note that APNU did NO campaigning until a few weeks before the election, and yet surprised all of us in how well they did.