Keith posted:

I asked a simple question and what I got a display of your incompetence to answer. Where did I discredited/critized your beliefs?

I did asked a question about the Quran, hm I don't see that as a criticism but since you raised that issue then again I ask,

How man days did it take God to create the heaven and earth according to the Quran, the book you ksazma believe in? 

I awate your answer, not surprising you will come up with excuse about being careful for what you ask for. Just answer the question. Don't you want to see if my response would be critical or not? 

Keep fooling yourself that it is incompetence. You really think that I am afraid to speak about the Qur'an? I am not interested in comparing the contents of Bible to that of the Qur'an because then I would by nature have to elevate the Qur'an which I refuse to do because it will go against my objection of you elevating your Christian belief above other beliefs. I am no rookie dude.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

I asked a simple question and what I got a display of your incompetence to answer. Where did I discredited/critized your beliefs?

I did asked a question about the Quran, hm I don't see that as a criticism but since you raised that issue then again I ask,

How man days did it take God to create the heaven and earth according to the Quran, the book you ksazma believe in? 

I awate your answer, not surprising you will come up with excuse about being careful for what you ask for. Just answer the question. Don't you want to see if my response would be critical or not? 

Keep fooling yourself that it is incompetence. You really think that I am afraid to speak about the Qur'an? I am not interested in comparing the contents of Bible to that of the Qur'an because then I would by nature have to elevate the Qur'an which I refuse to do because it will go against my objection of you elevating your Christian belief above other beliefs. I am no rookie dude.

Ksaz, bettah teech dis brudda Keith how fuh spell "AWAIT". Same thing I said about "dem bible skool pickney".

skeldon_man posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

I asked a simple question and what I got a display of your incompetence to answer. Where did I discredited/critized your beliefs?

I did asked a question about the Quran, hm I don't see that as a criticism but since you raised that issue then again I ask,

How man days did it take God to create the heaven and earth according to the Quran, the book you ksazma believe in? 

I awate your answer, not surprising you will come up with excuse about being careful for what you ask for. Just answer the question. Don't you want to see if my response would be critical or not? 

Keep fooling yourself that it is incompetence. You really think that I am afraid to speak about the Qur'an? I am not interested in comparing the contents of Bible to that of the Qur'an because then I would by nature have to elevate the Qur'an which I refuse to do because it will go against my objection of you elevating your Christian belief above other beliefs. I am no rookie dude.

Ksaz, bettah teech dis brudda Keith how fuh spell "AWAIT". Same thing I said about "dem bible skool pickney".

Thanks for the correction much appreciated

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

I asked a simple question and what I got a display of your incompetence to answer. Where did I discredited/critized your beliefs?

I did asked a question about the Quran, hm I don't see that as a criticism but since you raised that issue then again I ask,

How man days did it take God to create the heaven and earth according to the Quran, the book you ksazma believe in? 

I awate your answer, not surprising you will come up with excuse about being careful for what you ask for. Just answer the question. Don't you want to see if my response would be critical or not? 

Keep fooling yourself that it is incompetence. You really think that I am afraid to speak about the Qur'an? I am not interested in comparing the contents of Bible to that of the Qur'an because then I would by nature have to elevate the Qur'an which I refuse to do because it will go against my objection of you elevating your Christian belief above other beliefs. I am no rookie dude.

Another excuse, like I said not a bit surprise. Elevate all you want and keep running from the question.

Still waiting to see where I criticize your beliefs.

Keith posted:

 

Another excuse, like I said not a bit surprise. Elevate all you want and keep running from the question.

Still waiting to see where I criticize your beliefs.

I said other peoples' beliefs, not mine. Now go back and look for them.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

 

Another excuse, like I said not a bit surprise. Elevate all you want and keep running from the question.

Still waiting to see where I criticize your beliefs.

I said other peoples' beliefs, not mine. Now go back and look for them.

In that case where did I criticize other people beliefs on this forum? 

Keith posted:

In that case where did I criticize other people beliefs on this forum? 

It is embed in your many posts. Granted you are cutting and pasting these from someone else so they are not yours per say but when you decide to post them, you take on that person's or organization's burden. Your posts speak of your Christian way being the only way which is insulting to other peoples' beliefs. My objective was to demonstrate that there is nothing special with your way which I did very competently.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

In that case where did I criticize other people beliefs on this forum? 

It is embed in your many posts. Granted you are cutting and pasting these from someone else so they are not yours per say but when you decide to post them, you take on that person's or organization's burden. Your posts speak of your Christian way being the only way which is insulting to other peoples' beliefs. My objective was to demonstrate that there is nothing special with your way which I did very competently.

I said show me, I didn't asked for your analysis. And yes those post that I do during the week comes from "In touch ministry" and there noting in there that criticize another person beliefs. 

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

In that case where did I criticize other people beliefs on this forum? 

It is embed in your many posts. Granted you are cutting and pasting these from someone else so they are not yours per say but when you decide to post them, you take on that person's or organization's burden. Your posts speak of your Christian way being the only way which is insulting to other peoples' beliefs. My objective was to demonstrate that there is nothing special with your way which I did very competently.

I said show me, I didn't asked for your analysis. And yes those post that I do during the week comes from "In touch ministry" and there noting in there that criticize another person beliefs. 

You don't have to ask fro someone's input when you post on a public domain. It is part of the deal of participating of a public domain. You are always free to have your own private domain where you can post anything you wish. I am not here to do your work for you. I participate whenever I care to and to the extent that I do. I am not going back to show you anything. You can do that is you wish. I have moved on to your next post whenever you post it and if I care to get involved in it.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

In that case where did I criticize other people beliefs on this forum? 

It is embed in your many posts. Granted you are cutting and pasting these from someone else so they are not yours per say but when you decide to post them, you take on that person's or organization's burden. Your posts speak of your Christian way being the only way which is insulting to other peoples' beliefs. My objective was to demonstrate that there is nothing special with your way which I did very competently.

I said show me, I didn't asked for your analysis. And yes those post that I do during the week comes from "In touch ministry" and there nothing in there that criticize another person beliefs. 

You don't have to ask fro someone's input when you post on a public domain. It is part of the deal of participating of a public domain. You are always free to have your own private domain where you can post anything you wish. I am not here to do your work for you. I participate whenever I care to and to the extent that I do. I am not going back to show you anything. You can do that is you wish. I have moved on to your next post whenever you post it and if I care to get involved in it.

You're failing to understand, it's you who accused me of criticizing others beliefs here, I'm certain I've not therefore the burden is on you to present proof that I did what you are accusing me of. Is that too hard to understand?

This is too childish and it's showing how immature you're to understand simple reasoning. I have better things to do dude than to waste my time with you here. 

Have a great weekend folks, much love. 

The Foundation of Wisdom

Proverbs 9:7-12

“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Prov. 9:10). Initially, the connection between these two concepts may be difficult to grasp. How can fearing God make us wise?

First, we need to understand what it means to fear the Lord. This term is used to describe an awesome reverence for God that moves us to acknowledge Him as the sovereign ruler of heaven and earth, submit to His will, and walk in obedience. The result of such a response will be the acquisition of wisdom.

If we commit ourselves to living for God’s purposes rather than our own, we will gain greater understanding of Him. The Holy Spirit will enable us to see circumstances and people from His divine perspective. This kind of wisdom reaches beyond human perception and gives us discernment to make decisions that fit into the Lord’s plans for our life. Knowing that He always works for our best interests, we are empowered to walk confidently through both good and bad times.

But if we reject God’s instructions, we dishonor Him with our refusal to acknowledge His right to rule our life. It’s foolish to rebel against His authority and think we can ever win. Those who won’t fear God will never know real wisdom.

What is your attitude toward the Lord? If you truly revere Him, you will listen for His directions and heed His warnings. A desire to honor and please Him will motivate you to turn from evil and seek to live in obedience. The result will be wisdom beyond human understanding.

-In Touch Ministries-

Funny that Keith says that I am incompetent when that description better suits him. Take for example, I stated that at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his only son. Keith disagreed with that statement. So how am I the incompetent one?

ksazma posted:

Funny that Keith says that I am incompetent when that description better suits him. Take for example, I stated that at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his only son. Keith disagreed with that statement. So how am I the incompetent one?

I really don't have to say it when you are displaying your incompetence everyday.

I'm still waiting for you to present me with the evidence of what you were accusing me of.

You decided to change the subject by bringing up matters that were dealt and laid to rest. You are trying hard to escape your incompetence and your ignorance to comprehend is appalling.

Question: How many sons were in Abraham presence when God speak to him saying, "take thy ONLY son"....I think when reality kicks in you will get it.

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Funny that Keith says that I am incompetent when that description better suits him. Take for example, I stated that at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his only son. Keith disagreed with that statement. So how am I the incompetent one?

I really don't have to say it when you are displaying your incompetence everyday.

I'm still waiting for you to present me with the evidence of what you were accusing me of.

You decided to change the subject by bringing up matters that were dealt and laid to rest. You are trying hard to escape your incompetence and your ignorance to comprehend is appalling.

Question: How many sons were in Abraham presence when God speak to him saying, "take thy ONLY son"....I think when reality kicks in you will get it.

Dude, all the arguments that I have made on this topic are much more logical than what the church teaches so I could have picked any.

But you do realize that your question highlighted above makes your God look ever sillier? Wonder if you ever tell any of your kids that whenever they are not in the same room as you, they are not your child?

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Funny that Keith says that I am incompetent when that description better suits him. Take for example, I stated that at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his only son. Keith disagreed with that statement. So how am I the incompetent one?

I really don't have to say it when you are displaying your incompetence everyday.

I'm still waiting for you to present me with the evidence of what you were accusing me of.

You decided to change the subject by bringing up matters that were dealt and laid to rest. You are trying hard to escape your incompetence and your ignorance to comprehend is appalling.

Question: How many sons were in Abraham presence when God speak to him saying, "take thy ONLY son"....I think when reality kicks in you will get it.

Dude, all the arguments that I have made on this topic are much more logical than what the church teaches so I could have picked any.

But you do realize that your question highlighted above makes your God look ever sillier? Wonder if you ever tell any of your kids that whenever they are not in the same room as you, they are not your child?

Are you going to answer the question or skip it like all others? Just another simple question, that's all. 

You know the story so tell us was Ishmael present when God told Abraham, "take thy only son"? You did notice I break it down to a kid level of understanding for you because I didn't want to insult your intelligence, oh, I did, didn't I. Forgive me it was not intentional

So the new question I am asking of ksazma to tell us is:

Was Ishmael there in Abraham presence when God instructed him to, "take thy only son"? 

Folks as you can see it's a simple yes/no answer I need from my friend ksazma. 

Walking Wisely

Keith posted:

So the new question I am asking of ksazma to tell us is:

Was Ishmael there in Abraham presence when God instructed him to, "take thy only son"? 

Folks as you can see it's a simple yes/no answer I need from my friend ksazma. 

That's a stupid question dude. I am surprised you are taking so much pride in asking it. People don't stop being someone's child just because they live in a different place. Ishmael was still alive when Isaac was born and even when Isaac was around the age when Abraham tried to sacrifice his ONLY son. The only time Abraham had an ONLY son was before Isaac was born.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

So the new question I am asking of ksazma to tell us is:

Was Ishmael there in Abraham presence when God instructed him to, "take thy only son"? 

Folks as you can see it's a simple yes/no answer I need from my friend ksazma. 

That's a stupid question dude. I am surprised you are taking so much pride in asking it. People don't stop being someone's child just because they live in a different place. Ishmael was still alive when Isaac was born and even when Isaac was around the age when Abraham tried to sacrifice his ONLY son. The only time Abraham had an ONLY son was before Isaac was born.

Are you really listening to yourself when you are typing/speaking? As /I said your ignorance is appalling. I didn't say Ishmael was not Abraham child nor have I ever denied it.

What I'm asking you is simple. So far we have establish that Abraham had two sons, Ishmael the older son, Hagar being his mother and Isaac the younger son, Sarai being his mother, do you understand so far? Then we read Sarai had Abraham sent away her handmaid Hagar and son, do you recall that, did they leave or stayed? So if we were to take a census after Hagar and Ishmael departure we would find only Abraham, Sarai and their son Isaac.

Now I'm asking the question again, when God spoke to Abraham, "take thy only son", Where was Ishmael and Hagar? Were they currently present in Abraham household when God spoke to Abraham.

This very simple reasoning is displaying vacuous on your part. Keep it up and you will end up in a straight jacket, those white ones. 

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

So the new question I am asking of ksazma to tell us is:

Was Ishmael there in Abraham presence when God instructed him to, "take thy only son"? 

Folks as you can see it's a simple yes/no answer I need from my friend ksazma. 

That's a stupid question dude. I am surprised you are taking so much pride in asking it. People don't stop being someone's child just because they live in a different place. Ishmael was still alive when Isaac was born and even when Isaac was around the age when Abraham tried to sacrifice his ONLY son. The only time Abraham had an ONLY son was before Isaac was born.

Are you really listening to yourself when you are typing/speaking? As /I said your ignorance is appalling. I didn't say Ishmael was not Abraham child nor have I ever denied it.

What I'm asking you is simple. So far we have establish that Abraham had two sons, Ishmael the older son, Hagar being his mother and Isaac the younger son, Sarai being his mother, do you understand so far? Then we read Sarai had Abraham sent away her handmaid Hagar and son, do you recall that, did they leave or stayed? So if we were to take a census after Hagar and Ishmael departure we would find only Abraham, Sarai and their son Isaac.

Now I'm asking the question again, when God spoke to Abraham, "take thy only son", Where was Ishmael and Hagar? Were they currently present in Abraham household when God spoke to Abraham.

This very simple reasoning is displaying vacuous on your part. Keep it up and might end up in a straight jacket, those white ones. 

Nothing has changed from my last post. Your question is still stupid. At no time was Isaac Abraham's ONLY son. Only Ishmael was Abraham's ONLY son before Isaac was born. I don't play stupid games answering stupid questions. Keep that stupidness for when you are in your church.

Keep up all your snide remarks also. But then again your hero Jesus was just like that with all his rotten attitude and stupidness.

ksazma posted:

Keep up all your snide remarks also. But then again your hero Jesus was just like that with all his rotten attitude and stupidness.

I am only pointing out the obvious

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

So the new question I am asking of ksazma to tell us is:

Was Ishmael there in Abraham presence when God instructed him to, "take thy only son"? 

Folks as you can see it's a simple yes/no answer I need from my friend ksazma. 

That's a stupid question dude. I am surprised you are taking so much pride in asking it. People don't stop being someone's child just because they live in a different place. Ishmael was still alive when Isaac was born and even when Isaac was around the age when Abraham tried to sacrifice his ONLY son. The only time Abraham had an ONLY son was before Isaac was born.

Are you really listening to yourself when you are typing/speaking? As /I said your ignorance is appalling. I didn't say Ishmael was not Abraham child nor have I ever denied it.

What I'm asking you is simple. So far we have establish that Abraham had two sons, Ishmael the older son, Hagar being his mother and Isaac the younger son, Sarai being his mother, do you understand so far? Then we read Sarai had Abraham sent away her handmaid Hagar and son, do you recall that, did they leave or stayed? So if we were to take a census after Hagar and Ishmael departure we would find only Abraham, Sarai and their son Isaac.

Now I'm asking the question again, when God spoke to Abraham, "take thy only son", Where was Ishmael and Hagar? Were they currently present in Abraham household when God spoke to Abraham.

This very simple reasoning is displaying vacuous on your part. Keep it up and might end up in a straight jacket, those white ones. 

Nothing has changed from my last post. Your question is still stupid. At no time was Isaac Abraham's ONLY son. Only Ishmael was Abraham's ONLY son before Isaac was born. I don't play stupid games answering stupid questions. Keep that stupidness for when you are in your church.

Am I disputing the Abraham is Isaac only son? NO! Ishmael never cease from being his son. What I am asking you is to tell us the viewers, was Ishmael with Abraham when God spoke to him saying, "...taking thy only son.." Man, some folks need you to beat reasoning into their head.

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keep up all your snide remarks also. But then again your hero Jesus was just like that with all his rotten attitude and stupidness.

I am only pointing out the obvious

It is never necessary to point out the obvious.

Keith posted:

Am I disputing the Abraham is Isaac only son? NO! Ishmael never cease from being his son. 

Good. You finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

Am I disputing the Abraham is Isaac only son? NO! Ishmael never cease from being his son. 

Good. You finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'.

I think if you are to really pay attention to that book that you believe in and read you will see how many suspense it leaves you in. Case in point, did that book ever reveal to you the name of the person who was being sacrifice by Abraham or it left you to assume?

Anyway, back to your assumptions, what the heck are you talking about by stating, "finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'". You are one misguided individual and lack a whole lot of understanding.

Are you accusing me now of stating that Abraham only had one son?  If so I challenge you again to show where I said that. All I am asking, was Ishmael there when God spoke to Abraham about the sacrifice? We can getting into the  sacrifice issue once you answer my simple yes/no question.

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

Am I disputing the Abraham is Isaac only son? NO! Ishmael never cease from being his son. 

Good. You finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'.

I think if you are to really pay attention to that book that you believe in and read you will see how many suspense it leaves you in. Case in point, did that book ever reveal to you the name of the person who was being sacrifice by Abraham or it left you to assume?

Anyway, back to your assumptions, what the heck are you talking about by stating, "finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'". You are one misguided individual and lack a whole lot of understanding.

Are you accusing me now of stating that Abraham only had one son?  If so I challenge you again to show where I said that. All I am asking, was Ishmael there when God spoke to Abraham about the sacrifice? We can getting into the  sacrifice issue once you answer my simple yes/no question.

God never told Abraham to sacrifice anyone. Your book is misguided to think that God would ask one of his creature to kill his child. However, at the time that Abraham was going to sacrifice ISHMAEL, Isaac was not even conceived and therefore not in existence. Therefore when Abraham had only ONE child that child was Ishmael.

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

ksazma posted:

Keith posted:

Am I disputing the Abraham is Isaac only son? NO! Ishmael never cease from being his son. 

Good. You finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'.

I think if you are to really pay attention to that book that you believe in and read you will see how many suspense it leaves you in. Case in point, did that book ever reveal to you the name of the person who was being sacrifice by Abraham or it left you to assume?

Anyway, back to your assumptions, what the heck are you talking about by stating, "finally catch sense that your book or your God is confused to state that Isaac was Abraham's ONLY son at the time of the 'sacrifice'". You are one misguided individual and lack a whole lot of understanding.

Are you accusing me now of stating that Abraham only had one son?  If so I challenge you again to show where I said that. All I am asking, was Ishmael there when God spoke to Abraham about the sacrifice? We can getting into the  sacrifice issue once you answer my simple yes/no question.

God never told Abraham to sacrifice anyone. Your book is misguided to think that God would ask one of his creature to kill his child. However, at the time that Abraham was going to sacrifice ISHMAEL, Isaac was not even conceived and therefore not in existence. Therefore when Abraham had only ONE child that child was Ishmael.

I will address your misunderstanding later for now go read and be ready

You are in no position to do so as you stand on shaky ground. What kind of God asks a 99 years old man to slit the throat of his 13 years old son who he didn't have until he was in his 86th year? That would be nothing less than a very confused God.

God’s Word to Us

If all of scripture was inspired by the Holy Spirit, why then do non-Catholics reject seven of those Holy Spirit inspired books of the Catholic Bible? The Catholic Bible has 73 books while the non-Catholic ones have only 66 books. 

ksazma posted:

You are in no position to do so as you stand on shaky ground. What kind of God asks a 99 years old man to slit the throat of his 13 years old son who he didn't have until he was in his 86th year? That would be nothing less than a very confused God.

Looks like voodooism in Haiti.

Skelly, in the old days people used to believe lots of things and to give those beliefs credence they will claim that God ordained them. Our responsibility is to recognize those things as not from God because it makes God look like a sadist.

ksazma, perhaps you failed to understand the Bible and Quran, Abraham had obeyed God many times in his walk with Him, but no test could have been more severe than the one in Genesis 22. God commanded, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering" (Genesis 22:2). I understand that the Quran didn't say who was being sacrifice, we will get to that later to clear up your misunderstand.

Since this idea steam from ksazma misunderstanding of the phrase "only son", it becomes necessary to explain what this phrase exactly means in relation to Isaac. A careful reading of the Bible shows that the phrase is used to affirm Isaac's unique status, a status based on the following,

1 - Isaac was the promised child of Abraham, a fact which the Quran agrees with Genesis 17:15-21; Surah 11:69-73, 37:112-113, 51:24-30), pay attention to Surah 11:71 .

2 -  Isaac was conceived miraculously to a barren mother and a very aged father, the Quran likewise agreeing with Genesis 17:15-17, 18:9-15, 21:1-7; Galatians 4:28-29; Surah 11:69-73, 51:24-30

3 - In Genesis 13:14-18, 15:18-21, 28:13-14 God promised that it would be Isaac's descendants who would inherit the land given to Abraham. Ishmael had no part in the inheritance and promise given to Isaac through Abraham.

It is for these reasons that Isaac is called Abraham's only son since God himself reckoned him as the child of promise and blessings, an honor never bestowed upon Ishmael.

Even more startling is the fact that the Quran never mentions the name of the sacrificial child; amazing indeed considering how ksazma overzealous stated, as I quote him, "...at the time that Abraham was going to sacrifice ISHMAEL, Isaac was not even conceived..."

Lets read Surah 37:99-106: "And [then] he said, "Indeed, I will go to [where I am ordered by] my Lord; He will guide me. My Lord, grant me [a child] from among the righteous." So We gave him good tidings of a forbearing boy.

"And when he reached with him [the age of] exertion, he said, "O my son, indeed I have seen in a dream that I [must] sacrifice you, so see what you think." He said, "O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast."’

"And when they had both submitted and he put him down upon his forehead, we called out to him, ‘O Abraham! You have fulfilled the vision." Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good Indeed, this was the clear trial" (Surah 37:99-106).

Hmm, ksazma quote, "God never told Abraham to sacrifice anyone", you should read Surah 11:71 again.

I recall an Islamic historian by the of Al-Tabari, do you know him ksazma? he said, and I quote, "The earliest sages of our Prophet's nation disagree about which of Abraham's two sons it was that he was commanded to sacrifice. Some say it was Isaac, while others say it was Ishmael. Both views are supported by statements related on the authority of the Messenger of God. If both groups of statements were equally sound, then - since they both came from the Prophet only the Quran could serve as proof that the account naming Isaac is clearly the more truthful of the two."

Once again ksazma prove how incompetent he's, even the book he believe in he don't understand, ksazma didn't even know where God was requiring a sacrifice of Abraham. ksazma said, "God never told Abraham to sacrifice anyone".  I understand your unfortunate situation, it's a book that skips around and failed to stay on point and leave you with a whole lot of guess work.

The ground under your feet might be sinking, I hope you verify your resident was not built on a sink hole .....look like you are sinking and drowning in your incompetence faster that I expected.

Nobody is discussing any other book. This is about the book you presented, the Bible. When you see me state on this topic that I follow the Qur'an, then you can expand the scope to include it. The only book you are pontificating is the Bible and I respond strictly to what you post on the Bible. And I repeat, at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his ONLY son. Also only a sadistic God would ask a 99 years old man to kill his 13 years old child when he did not have that child until he was 86.

ksazma posted:

Nobody is discussing any other book. This is about the book you presented, the Bible. When you see me state on this topic that I follow the Qur'an, then you can expand the scope to include it. The only book you are pontificating is the Bible and I respond strictly to what you post on the Bible. And I repeat, at no time in Abraham's life was Isaac his ONLY son. Also only a sadistic God would ask a 99 years old man to kill his 13 years old child when he did not have that child until he was 86.

And I repeat again, at NO time did I say Abraham only son was Isaac. All books are fair play, I quote the Bible and the Quran to present my factual statements.

I need you to tell us whether Ishmael was present when God spoke to Abraham saying, "...take thy only son.." I await. YES/NO!.....lets see how ksazma avoid this question again

Maybe you didn't say that Isaac was Abraham's only son. What I initially stated was that when your Bible stated that Isaac was Abraham's only son, either the writer was confused or God was.  All books can't be fair play when all books weren't introduced. You began with the Bible and so far only you are desperately seeking to add other books. Deal with the one you started with. I have no interest in going beyond that.

ksazma posted:

Maybe you didn't say that Isaac was Abraham's only son. What I initially stated was that when your Bible stated that Isaac was Abraham's only son, either the writer was confused or God was.  All books can't be fair play when all books weren't introduced. You began with the Bible and so far only you is desparately seeking to add other books. Deal with the one you started with. I have no interest in going beyond that.

Here answer your own questions, was Ishmael present when God spoke to Abraham saying, "...take thy only son..". YES/NO!?

Why you running from answering the question? But what can we expect from you never a straight answer or start another subject. 

Any book that can back up my factual statement I will used, grow up dude.