Now trying to digress from your lack of comprehension by bringing other statements.

I think I spent enough time trying to teach you English and comprehension. Obviously, I will not make a good teacher! Good night.

I think Zed is D_G. The writing style is very similar. As Zed he is careful not to use a certain word.

The last bit of info you asked about. I got from a leading  member of tge PNC, someone who backedGreenidge for the leadership, someone  who now has a high government position. Obviously, I cannot reveal who that is in order to protect that person.

Mitwah posted:

I think Zed is D_G. The writing style is very similar. As Zed he is careful not to use a certain word.

I can, with no hesitation, and with no ambiguity,  say that you are wrong to think that Zed and DG are the same person.

goodnight

Zed posted:

Now trying to digress from your lack of comprehension by bringing other statements.

I think I spent enough time trying to teach you English and comprehension. Obviously, I will not make a good teacher! Good night.

 

 "Granger might have been a life long member of the PNC, but it was Corbin who brought him into the leadership race, promoted him and stood by him Against Greenidge and others. Make no mistake, Corbin was respected within the PNC, except  maybe for Greene who always hoped to be leader of the PNC and president." 

You made these statements and now you're trying to dodge them. You're trying to pick and choose what you should provide proof for. Hahaha. Looks like you're throwing in the towel because you realize that you cannot provide proof for your own opinions. You demand proof from others but you cannot live up to your own demands. You'll never make a good teacher because you don't practice what you preach and you're attempting to teach someone who's much more accomplished than you are at English Language and Comprehension. What a bloody hypocrite! 

Zed posted:

The last bit of info you asked about. I got from a leading  member of tge PNC, someone who backedGreenidge for the leadership, someone  who now has a high government position. Obviously, I cannot reveal who that is in order to protect that person.

Who do you think you're speaking to, your boys at the rum shop? Hearsay and baseless opinions are not proof Knucklehead. Nice try.

Mars posted:

Zed posted:

Now trying to digress from your lack of comprehension by bringing other statements.

I think I spent enough time trying to teach you English and comprehension. Obviously, I will not make a good teacher! Good night.

 

 "Granger might have been a life long member of the PNC, but it was Corbin who brought him into the leadership race, promoted him and stood by him Against Greenidge and others. Make no mistake, Corbin was respected within the PNC, except  maybe for Greene who always hoped to be leader of the PNC and president." 

You made these statements and now you're trying to dodge them. You're trying to pick and choose what you should provide proof for. Hahaha. Looks like you're throwing in the towel because you realize that you cannot provide proof for your own opinions. You demand proof from others but you cannot live up to your own demands. You'll never make a good teacher because you don't practice what you preach and you're attempting to teach someone who's much more accomplished than you are at English Language and Comprehension. What a bloody hypocrite! 

The point I want to get across to you is that you, and so many like you come on this site and make wild statements without marshaling any facts or arguments to support them. People visiting this site will leave, thinking these opinions are supported by some facts and before long, it is passed around as fact. 

To this point, you seem to think that only a contract or something to that effect will prove it. Well, you do not need to show a contract. If it brays. Has four legs, eats grass, it is a donkey. Pose the actions or attributes that lend to the statement!  

If something is posted as a narrative or an opinion without any supporting arguments, then you are asking readers to post accept what you post on faith, as gospel instead of reason.

saying that you are much more accomplished than me is infantile as an argument because you have not established a basis in fact that this is so. But I need to leave you with your illusions!

regarding my source and reference to rum shop. First, the individual is now a diplomat. And second, sometimes some of the losters on this site act as if this is a rum shop. (If they still are what they were about thirty years ago)

Zed posted:

Mars posted:

Zed posted:

Now trying to digress from your lack of comprehension by bringing other statements.

I think I spent enough time trying to teach you English and comprehension. Obviously, I will not make a good teacher! Good night.

 

 "Granger might have been a life long member of the PNC, but it was Corbin who brought him into the leadership race, promoted him and stood by him Against Greenidge and others. Make no mistake, Corbin was respected within the PNC, except  maybe for Greene who always hoped to be leader of the PNC and president." 

You made these statements and now you're trying to dodge them. You're trying to pick and choose what you should provide proof for. Hahaha. Looks like you're throwing in the towel because you realize that you cannot provide proof for your own opinions. You demand proof from others but you cannot live up to your own demands. You'll never make a good teacher because you don't practice what you preach and you're attempting to teach someone who's much more accomplished than you are at English Language and Comprehension. What a bloody hypocrite! 

The point I want to get across to you is that you, and so many like you come on this site and make wild statements without marshaling any facts or arguments to support them. People visiting this site will leave, thinking these opinions are supported by some facts and before long, it is passed around as fact. 

Well, practice what you preach, Hypocrite. That's the point I want to get across to you but your impervious cranium is making it a bit difficult. You made wild statements about Granger and now you can't show any proof, the same standard you are demanding from me. 

To this point, you seem to think that only a contract or something to that effect will prove it. Well, you do not need to show a contract. If it brays. Has four legs, eats grass, it is a donkey. Pose the actions or attributes that lend to the statement!  

You asked for proof, Fool, not actions or attributes or rum shop talk. Do you understand the meaning of the word "proof"? Didn't you claim that you are accomplished in English Comprehension? Looks like once again, you have no proof to support what you say.

If something is posted as a narrative or an opinion without any supporting arguments, then you are asking readers to post accept what you post on faith, as gospel instead of reason.

I never asked anyone to believe anything I say. I have arguments to support what I write but I'm not under obligation to anyone to post supporting material for each and every sentence. What do you think, we're in law school here? Get real!

saying that you are much more accomplished than me is infantile as an argument because you have not established a basis in fact that this is so. But I need to leave you with your illusions!

I'm just returning the favor to you based on the several digs that you threw my way so why are you whining like a little girl now? Here you are talking about infantile behavior and in the next sentence, you repeat the same thing again. You definitely have a problem with living up to the standards that you demand of others. 

regarding my source and reference to rum shop. First, the individual is now a diplomat. And second, sometimes some of the losters on this site act as if this is a rum shop. (If they still are what they were about thirty years ago)

I don't give two hoots who your source is. You can claim that God told you directly and it wouldn't impress me. You asked for proof so I expect that you'd deliver the same when asked for it. Now you're coming with some bullshit story about someone high up in the government told you this and it has to be true. Let me remind you once more because it takes a while for your neurons to start firing. Hearsay and baseless opinions are not proof, Knucklehead. I can easily tell you that many people in the PPP executive told me so but we're talking about proof not some "the dog ate my homework" story.

See my answers above in bold letters.

We're still waiting for your proof. Tick tock.

The bickering on GNI over petty issues makes a lie that Prashad's Indesh will work. Once their battle with blacks finishes Indesh will battle amongst itself.

caribny posted:

The bickering on GNI over petty issues makes a lie that Prashad's Indesh will work. Once their battle with blacks finishes Indesh will battle amongst itself.

à la  Hindus & Muslims in Gujarat.

Gilbakka posted:

caribny posted:

The bickering on GNI over petty issues makes a lie that Prashad's Indesh will work. Once their battle with blacks finishes Indesh will battle amongst itself.

à la  Hindus & Muslims in Gujarat.

Right. The violence in India among Indians is way worse than that in Guyana between Indians and blacks.